The 100 Greatest U.S. Error Coins
Zoins
Posts: 34,117 ✭✭✭✭✭
Post photos of the 100 Greatest U.S. Error Coins here
1862 Indian Head Cent - #3 of 100 Greatest Errors - PCGS MS67 - Ex. Harrison Phillips, Bob Simpson
Here's Number 3. Just ran into this again and noticed it's sporting a new TrueView!
I saw the old cert number on Heritage for the Simpson sale and now it's sporting the new cert number on the same lot. I think Heritage had the coins resubmitted for the sale and the cert numbers got changed.
This sold for $40,800.00 back in September!
Tagged:
9
Comments
That split IHC die cap formally NGC MS67 came out of Million Dollar Error Collection that David Lawrence handled about 15 years ago.
Great book... For anyone interested in coins, or specifically in errors... It contains super pictures and information. Cheers, RickO
The title of that book is very misleading. It makes promises it doesn't deliver. The Greatest Error of All Time isn't even listed.
Luckily I have a photo of it.
2016P NICKEL OVERSTRUCK ON 2015P NICKEL - Greatest Error of All Time - MS66 - Ex. US Mint, Loomis
Sorry, but the book was published in 2010.....
......we just couldn't wait !
for PCGS. A 49+-Year PNG Member...A full numismatist since 1972, retired in 2022
Hey Fred....the new Sagagawea/Presidential dollar mule belongs in there.
What about the 2013(?) fractional gold eagle with the narrow reeding intended for the Buffalo coin of that size?
The new Sac./Pres. Mule would qualify, but I don't think
the Reeding Varieties would, imo.
And, we (Dave C. and I) haven't talked about another edition at this point.
for PCGS. A 49+-Year PNG Member...A full numismatist since 1972, retired in 2022
And who here thinks that wasn't brought out of the mint by a mint employee?
Better get cracking on your own book.
Not to play one-upsmanship, but if that Jefferson Nickel belongs in the book, so does this Liberty Head Nickel:
Member ANA, SPMC, SCNA, FUN, CONECA
In that day and age, it could have been legitimately sold out of the Mint
That is an awesome coin and very difficult to improve upon! The only way it could be better is if it was a 1913!
I have to say what is really striking about the Phillips-Simpson 1862 IHC Die Cap in the OP is that I've never seen any other error like it, even from shops that purposely put out intentional "errors". Are there any like this?
Many other errors like wrong planchets, off centers, double strikes, double denominations, die caps, clusters, etc. are somewhat common. Well, clusters aren't that common but there are a handful.
1943 Lincoln Cent--Overstruck on a 1943 Mercury Dime - #39 of 100 Greatest errors - MS62 (NGC)
Ex. Bill Fivaz, John Whitney Walter
Realized (Aug 15, 2018): $33,600
Here's Number 39. This is a pretty insane double denomination error. I especially like the cent reverse on the Mercury dime obverse!
https://auctions.stacksbowers.com/lots/view/3-BINUG/1943-lincoln-cent-overstruck-on-a-1943-mercury-dime-ms-62-ngc
1961-D Franklin Half Dollar Struck on a Cent Planchet - 87 of 100 Greatest U.S. Errors Variation - NGC MS67 RB
The book lists a 1963-D Half Dollar on a Cent Planchet as number 87. This one is the same error type but 2 years earlier!
https://auctions.stacksbowers.com/lots/view/3-J4SBL/1961-d-franklin-half-dollar-struck-on-a-cent-planchet-ms-67-rb-ngc
I like that better than any of the 1913's
Hey Fred- Didn't you guys forget one?
We owned that piece (very briefly) back in 2003 when it was in the NGC MS67 holder;
That particular Nail wasn't out in 2010, and yes, there
are numerous other great Error coins that have come
up that would replace some of the #'s in the book.
Also, we specifically had to limit our voting choices back
in 2009 to those coins we could take new photos of -
and had access to - so many pieces were not available
for voting. (think: 1915 Lincoln Cent on a $2.5 Gold planchet
that has not surfaced or been seen at all in around 100 years)
for PCGS. A 49+-Year PNG Member...A full numismatist since 1972, retired in 2022
Is that really an error?
Some extreme errors are questionable, but that one leaves no doubt.
I guess I was mostly being facetious with my statement and challenging/insinuating if in fact that is a real/legitimate mint error.