Home› Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

1991 Netpro Agassi rookie

Comments

  • TabeTabe Posts: 6,061 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Lot of chipping for a 10 but a great photo on a nice card. Was a huge Agassi fan back in the day.

  • thedutymon11thedutymon11 Posts: 668 ✭✭✭✭

    @Tabe said:
    Lot of chipping for a 10 but a great photo on a nice card. Was a huge Agassi fan back in the day.

    And if I subbed it its a MINT 9 50% of the time and NM-MT 8 the other half!

    YeaHaH!

    Neil

  • coolstanleycoolstanley Posts: 2,878 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I believe its also a mis-label by PSA. Its not a prototype.

    Terry Bradshaw was AMAZING!!

    Ignore list -Basebal21

  • eagles33eagles33 Posts: 2,682 ✭✭✭

    Not a rookie. He has a 1987 panini.

    Scans of most of my Misc rookies can be found <a target=new class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://forums.collectors.com/m...y&keyword1=Non%20major">here
  • coolstanleycoolstanley Posts: 2,878 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 5, 2021 2:53PM

    @eagles33 said:
    Not a rookie. He has a 1987 panini.

    The panini is pretty rare. Use to be able to get those pretty cheap. Good luck now. The 87 is an ugly card compared to the 91 netpro. This is his first netpro card, so that makes it a rookie.

    Terry Bradshaw was AMAZING!!

    Ignore list -Basebal21

  • Autos4AlexAutos4Alex Posts: 442 ✭✭✭

    @coolstanley said:
    I believe its also a mis-label by PSA. Its not a prototype.

    There's a prototype sampras, I'm not aware of a prototype agassi though not impossible. I agree with eagles not his rookie, several earlier cards notably the panini

  • Dpeck100Dpeck100 Posts: 10,912 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I bought a set of the 88 Panini Supersport for the Tyson Gritti back and Agassi is in the set and has three backs. Mine is the rare version like the Gritti back but is just a PSA 6. I bet copies of this have probably risen. Nice to see action in Tennis cards.

  • coolstanleycoolstanley Posts: 2,878 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I also love this Agassi rookie. Very popular among collectors. Great looking card. I believe this is his first American card.

    https://www.ebay.com/itm/1989-SPORTS-ILLUSTRATED-FOR-KIDS-SI-FOR-KIDS-47-ANDRE-AGASSI-GEM-MINT-PSA-10/265058316865?hash=item3db6b4f241:g:6egAAOSwSbhgLjmo

    Terry Bradshaw was AMAZING!!

    Ignore list -Basebal21

  • Kepper19Kepper19 Posts: 335 ✭✭✭

    @eagles33 said:
    Not a rookie. He has a 1987 panini.

    and an S.I. for Kids card as well...1989

  • ndleondleo Posts: 4,136 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I saw a couple of 1991 Netpro boxes at a LCS. It is the white box that has Agassi and Sampras in it. He has them at $200 each. Is it worth the gamble?

    I saw a 5 box lot sold for $1400 on ebay, but I don't follow the tennis market. It seems like the 2003 Netpro is everywhere.

    Mike
  • craig44craig44 Posts: 11,244 ✭✭✭✭✭

    is the 91 Agassi a "rookie" in the same way the 86 Fleer Jordan is a "Rookie"?

    George Brett, Roger Clemens and Tommy Brady.

  • DBesse27DBesse27 Posts: 3,078 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @craig44 said:
    is the 91 Agassi a "rookie" in the same way the 86 Fleer Jordan is a "Rookie"?

    Yup.

    Yaz Master Set
    #1 Gino Cappelletti master set
    #1 John Hannah master set

    Also collecting Andre Tippett, Patriots Greats' RCs, Dwight Evans, 1964 Venezuelan Topps, 1974 Topps Red Sox

  • ndleondleo Posts: 4,136 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Let me do the dangerous checklist/box math problem.

    98 cards in the set. 40 packs/9 cards each = 360 cards. 3.67 Agassi and Sampras per box? I think I'm going to pull the trigger.

    Mike
  • Cs223406Cs223406 Posts: 145 ✭✭✭✭

    these are loaded -- I opened a few of these before the surge (ndleo's math is correct).
    My final box yielded 5 Agassi and 2 Sampras per my notes.

    Good luck
    Cs

  • coolstanleycoolstanley Posts: 2,878 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I love the 91 boxes.

    Terry Bradshaw was AMAZING!!

    Ignore list -Basebal21

  • ndleondleo Posts: 4,136 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I wouldn't have even thought of Tennis until I saw this thread. This is why I love this board!

    Mike
Sign In or Register to comment.