Toned Franklin AT or NT?

coinsarefun

I've had this along with many other years its with the clear plastic lid.
Some coins have toned different holders. Ive had the quarter, nickel and cents grade 5-6 years ago
but always thought this might get the reject puff of air and blow it off the conveyor grading belt
.
Plus I dont think I have mastered my new lights as a member here said they are great for blast white coins but
difficult to show color and luster. I took a few shots along side another coin for reference.
.
.
.

PTVETTER

NT

airplanenut

I'd lean to NT, though it may depend in part on the exact shade of some of those colors. In the last photo, some of the blues in the hair look a bit on the unnatural side to me. That's not to say they are AT, and it could also be the photo, but that would be my concern. Could also be that difference between actually AT/NT versus what a grading company would be comfortable putting in a holder.

MFeld

IF the color in the images is accurate, I’d guess AT. However, if, in hand, the colors are more subtle, I might reach a different conclusion.

coinsarefun

Here are two more, using my old lights. Only cropped. The live you see across his face is a toning break line, not scratch.
Btw, I'm going to take the remaining coins out as that black color felt or paper.....whatever that is. Doesn't always
produce nice toning.
.
.
Worth grading??
.
.

keets

too much red/purple.

coinsarefun

From Coinfacts
red, blues and purples.
Granted mine is more splotchy...
.
.


.
.
I sold this one years back
.
.

DrewU

I think it is NT that would likely grade QT as a result of the splotchy patterning on the obverse.

Jimnight

Looks pretty natural to me.

Kliao

I would say NT too.

chesterb

Looks like the toning I see from coins I place near the litter box to purposely tone them.

abcde12345

@Jimnight said:
Looks pretty natural to me.

Walkerfan

MA

bsshog40

I'm in the NT camp!

fathom

Not worth grading.

Namvet69

I like it, whatever it is cause it's mellow. Peace Roy

panexpoguy

Looks NT to me.

cameonut2011

All look QT to me.

Mr_Spud

I think it’s NT but with a toning pattern that can be produced artificially so it might get a QT designation if submitted.

koynekwest

NT and attractive!

coinsarefun

Thanks everyone. I have quite a few other things to get graded so
I’ll give it a shot.

mannie gray

NT

ShaunBC5

I think it’s probably NT. I suppose they can “question” anything, but it looks fine to me.
Good luck! Looking forward to updates.

koynekwest

Be sure to let us know how it grades.

ricko

For some reason, mint set Franklins in 62/63 seemed to tarnish in that way....I have seen others like this. Not that it cannot be duplicated artificially, but I have seen it in sealed sets. Hard to say from pictures, Good luck Stef. Cheers, RickO

yspsales

I have been trying to learn the process of NT.

Yellow around the edges.
No on but into the recess of letters and date.
Progresses into blue then magenta.

My guess is NT.

Please correct me if I am wrong.