Home U.S. Coin Forum

UGHHHH Should this coin receive a straight grade?

amwldcoinamwldcoin Posts: 11,269 ✭✭✭✭✭

I won't say anymore!

Comments

  • TomBTomB Posts: 21,487 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Eeesh! Do you think it looked like that when slabbed or do you think it may have turned somewhat in the holder?

    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image
  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 35,085 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @TomB said:
    Eeesh! Do you think it looked like that when slabbed or do you think it may have turned somewhat in the holder?

    The current color isn't the problem. The possible cleaning underneath the color is the issue.

  • amwldcoinamwldcoin Posts: 11,269 ✭✭✭✭✭

    As best as I can tell that is a very recent submission.

    @TomB said:
    Eeesh! Do you think it looked like that when slabbed or do you think it may have turned somewhat in the holder?

  • amwldcoinamwldcoin Posts: 11,269 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That is a classic example of a coin that was dipped and improperly rinsed....but it takes awhile to get to this point.

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @TomB said:
    Eeesh! Do you think it looked like that when slabbed or do you think it may have turned somewhat in the holder?

    The current color isn't the problem. The possible cleaning underneath the color is the issue.

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 35,085 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @amwldcoin said:
    That is a classic example of a coin that was dipped and improperly rinsed....but it takes awhile to get to this point.

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @TomB said:
    Eeesh! Do you think it looked like that when slabbed or do you think it may have turned somewhat in the holder?

    The current color isn't the problem. The possible cleaning underneath the color is the issue.

    Agreed.

  • goldengolden Posts: 9,791 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Sure is ugly!

  • scubafuelscubafuel Posts: 1,885 ✭✭✭✭✭

    They are allowed to slab ugly coins, but that is right on the edge of stained.

  • Cougar1978Cougar1978 Posts: 8,388 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Definitely a C coin.

    Coins & Currency
  • amwldcoinamwldcoin Posts: 11,269 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Anyone wanna guess the grade if they don't already know?

  • ashelandasheland Posts: 23,335 ✭✭✭✭✭
  • CoinJunkieCoinJunkie Posts: 8,772 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I've seen plenty of fugly coins in graded holders over the years. Looks XF40ish.

  • amwldcoinamwldcoin Posts: 11,269 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It's in an AU50 holder so IMHO it is over graded also!

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I see your UGHHHH ... and raise you two more UGHHHH's....Cheers, RickO

  • abcde12345abcde12345 Posts: 3,404 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Bet it looks better when all the lights are turned off.

  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 46,356 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Suggest sending it back for the conservation service.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • CryptoCrypto Posts: 3,736 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Attractive isnt the same thing as gradable. That why valuation is effected more by total coin grading than technical grading except in the cases of rarity where grading is more of a raking of survivors.

  • amwldcoinamwldcoin Posts: 11,269 ✭✭✭✭✭

    This is an example of why price guides are so messed up. I would pay at least double for a nice one in the same grade and holder! The 01-O is a major sleeper in better grades. That POS just turned my POP 1 AU50 to a POP 2. :s

    @Crypto said:
    Attractive isnt the same thing as gradable. That why valuation is effected more by total coin grading than technical grading except in the cases of rarity where grading is more of a raking of survivors.

  • DNADaveDNADave Posts: 7,279 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Is that a newly slabbed coin?

  • amwldcoinamwldcoin Posts: 11,269 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It has to be due to the number and I know I checked the POP reports at the most 2 months ago.

    @DNADave said:
    Is that a newly slabbed coin?

  • CryptoCrypto Posts: 3,736 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @amwldcoin said:
    This is an example of why price guides are so messed up. I would pay at least double for a nice one in the same grade and holder! The 01-O is a major sleeper in better grades. That POS just turned my POP 1 AU50 to a POP 2. :s

    @Crypto said:
    Attractive isnt the same thing as gradable. That why valuation is effected more by total coin grading than technical grading except in the cases of rarity where grading is more of a raking of survivors.

    while that sucks and i get it, the only alt would be to only put nice coins in holders and that option has a lot more losers

  • TreashuntTreashunt Posts: 6,747 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Cougar1978 said:
    Definitely a C coin.

    sorry to disagree.

    clearly a D coin

    Frank

    BHNC #203

  • truebloodtrueblood Posts: 609 ✭✭✭✭

    Ruh Roh

  • HydrantHydrant Posts: 7,773 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited February 2, 2021 10:58AM

    Start over......Crack it, dip it, rinse it.

  • fiftysevenerfiftysevener Posts: 916 ✭✭✭✭

    Looks AU 48 to me

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file