Not a 14D, mintmark in wrong position- there's one spot only for it to be- and thats the location shown in picture above of a genuine coin- you don't even have to look at the last digit.
Although there were at least a half dozen 1914-D obverse dies used, each with individually punched mintmarks, all were remarkably alike in their location relative to the date.
So it is fair to say there's only one spot for it to be even though technically there are 6 or more locations.
Lance.
@Mr_Spud said:
Here’s a pic showing that one on top and a real 14 d below
I have a 1918-D cent that is not worn as badly as the coin in the first image that has the 'D' mintmark position in the same place as the badly worn coin.
Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.-Albert Einstein
Comments
looks like 1916 to me
Doesn’t look like a 4 to me
Mr_Spud
Here’s a pic showing that one on top and a real 14 d below
Mr_Spud
Not a 14D, mintmark in wrong position- there's one spot only for it to be- and thats the location shown in picture above of a genuine coin- you don't even have to look at the last digit.
Although there were at least a half dozen 1914-D obverse dies used, each with individually punched mintmarks, all were remarkably alike in their location relative to the date.
So it is fair to say there's only one spot for it to be even though technically there are 6 or more locations.
Lance.
Looks like a 1910-D to me.
The 1914-D has 6 different mintmark positions, and 7 reverse dies.
Pete
Looks like a '16 to me... As above, not a '14.....Cheers, RickO
Gone.
I have a 1918-D cent that is not worn as badly as the coin in the first image that has the 'D' mintmark position in the same place as the badly worn coin.
Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.-Albert Einstein