Home› World & Ancient Coins Forum

1936 Canadian Dollar

ajaanajaan Posts: 17,463 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited November 25, 2020 5:39PM in World & Ancient Coins Forum

EF? AU? Perhaps I didn't make myself clear. I wanted opinions on the grade. I know the coin has been cleaned/dipped. New image.,


Thanks Gene.


DPOTD-3
'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'

CU #3245 B.N.A. #428


Don

Comments

  • YorkshiremanYorkshireman Posts: 4,583 ✭✭✭✭✭

    1936’s are easy to find.
    You will find another.

    Yorkshireman,Obsessed collector of round, metallic pieces of history.Hunting for Latin American colonial portraits plus cool US & British coins.
  • ajaanajaan Posts: 17,463 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Yorkshireman said:
    1936’s are easy to find.
    You will find another.

    I already own it.


    DPOTD-3
    'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'

    CU #3245 B.N.A. #428


    Don
  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,461 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It looks cleaned.

    All glory is fleeting.
  • MasonGMasonG Posts: 6,261 ✭✭✭✭✭

    My vote is for AU, cleaned. The picture is a bit blurry.

  • BoosibriBoosibri Posts: 12,255 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Agree cleaned looking

    Latin American Collection

  • 7Jaguars7Jaguars Posts: 7,584 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I can see dipped, not necessarily "cleaned".

    Love that Milled British (1830-1960)
    Well, just Love coins, period.
  • EagleScout2017EagleScout2017 Posts: 240 ✭✭✭

    It definitely looks like it was cleaned, in my opinion, as there appears to be some traces of luster remaining in the recesses of the lettering. Nonetheless, better photos would go a long way in making a better assessment of your coin.

  • MasonGMasonG Posts: 6,261 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @7Jaguars said:
    I can see dipped, not necessarily "cleaned".

    My reason for cleaned: The coin looks to have little enough wear to still have luster, but I'm not seeing any.

  • 7Jaguars7Jaguars Posts: 7,584 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I see plenty around the lettering, and there definitely appears to be some lighting artifact. Better pictures always good, but this coin is looking AUish IMO.

    Love that Milled British (1830-1960)
    Well, just Love coins, period.
  • MasonGMasonG Posts: 6,261 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @7Jaguars said:
    I see plenty around the lettering, and there definitely appears to be some lighting artifact. Better pictures always good, but this coin is looking AUish IMO.

    I'm not questioning the grade. Around the lettering, I'd agree there's some luster but the fields look awfully washed out.

  • amwldcoinamwldcoin Posts: 11,269 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I think the picture looks blurry because it has been whizzed!

    @MasonG said:
    My vote is for AU, cleaned. The picture is a bit blurry.

  • YQQYQQ Posts: 3,316 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 26, 2020 8:24AM

    you get an AU on this one. min EF 45. But NGC could be unpredictable :o
    After playing with this coin and its exposure (photo), I will change my mind and say it could be a 55.

    Today is the first day of the rest of my life
  • ElmhurstElmhurst Posts: 792 ✭✭✭

    Cleaned, but no problem to replace at low cost

Sign In or Register to comment.