Home› World & Ancient Coins Forum
Options

1936 Canadian Dollar

ajaanajaan Posts: 17,124 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited November 25, 2020 5:39PM in World & Ancient Coins Forum

EF? AU? Perhaps I didn't make myself clear. I wanted opinions on the grade. I know the coin has been cleaned/dipped. New image.,


Thanks Gene.


DPOTD-3
'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'

CU #3245 B.N.A. #428


Don

Comments

  • Options
    YorkshiremanYorkshireman Posts: 4,494 ✭✭✭✭✭

    1936’s are easy to find.
    You will find another.

    Yorkshireman,Obsessed collector of round, metallic pieces of history.Hunting for Latin American colonial portraits plus cool US & British coins.
  • Options
    ajaanajaan Posts: 17,124 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Yorkshireman said:
    1936’s are easy to find.
    You will find another.

    I already own it.


    DPOTD-3
    'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'

    CU #3245 B.N.A. #428


    Don
  • Options
    291fifth291fifth Posts: 23,945 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It looks cleaned.

    All glory is fleeting.
  • Options
    MasonGMasonG Posts: 6,268 ✭✭✭✭✭

    My vote is for AU, cleaned. The picture is a bit blurry.

  • Options
    BoosibriBoosibri Posts: 11,873 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Agree cleaned looking

    Latin American Collection

  • Options
    7Jaguars7Jaguars Posts: 7,268 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I can see dipped, not necessarily "cleaned".

    Love that Milled British (1830-1960)
    Well, just Love coins, period.
  • Options
    EagleScout2017EagleScout2017 Posts: 238 ✭✭✭

    It definitely looks like it was cleaned, in my opinion, as there appears to be some traces of luster remaining in the recesses of the lettering. Nonetheless, better photos would go a long way in making a better assessment of your coin.

    delenda est WitterU

  • Options
    MasonGMasonG Posts: 6,268 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @7Jaguars said:
    I can see dipped, not necessarily "cleaned".

    My reason for cleaned: The coin looks to have little enough wear to still have luster, but I'm not seeing any.

  • Options
    7Jaguars7Jaguars Posts: 7,268 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I see plenty around the lettering, and there definitely appears to be some lighting artifact. Better pictures always good, but this coin is looking AUish IMO.

    Love that Milled British (1830-1960)
    Well, just Love coins, period.
  • Options
    MasonGMasonG Posts: 6,268 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @7Jaguars said:
    I see plenty around the lettering, and there definitely appears to be some lighting artifact. Better pictures always good, but this coin is looking AUish IMO.

    I'm not questioning the grade. Around the lettering, I'd agree there's some luster but the fields look awfully washed out.

  • Options
    amwldcoinamwldcoin Posts: 11,269 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I think the picture looks blurry because it has been whizzed!

    @MasonG said:
    My vote is for AU, cleaned. The picture is a bit blurry.

  • Options
    YQQYQQ Posts: 3,277 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 26, 2020 8:24AM

    you get an AU on this one. min EF 45. But NGC could be unpredictable :o
    After playing with this coin and its exposure (photo), I will change my mind and say it could be a 55.

    Today is the first day of the rest of my life
  • Options
    ElmhurstElmhurst Posts: 777 ✭✭✭

    Cleaned, but no problem to replace at low cost

Sign In or Register to comment.