2 1851 DO JMR 8 reales

bidask

Beside the assigned grades and outstanding strike on the MS 65 do you notice any other differences ?

Think varieties .

?

TwoKopeiki

wow, both the OD and the 10/01

bidask

@TwoKopeiki said:
wow, both the OD and the 10/01

I see the 10/01 variety but i dont see the OD

TwoKopeiki

@bidask said:

@TwoKopeiki said:
wow, both the OD and the 10/01

I see the 10/01 variety but i dont see the OD

Checked Resplandores and you're right - it's not an overdate.

bidask

The below coin is attributed as a normal date .

However I think PCGS has miss attributed
this 1861 DO CP below . I believe it’s overdate 1861/0 .

If you have a RESPLANDORES please give me your opinion thank you .

Boosibri

1861/0 it is

Abuelo

I am more intrigued by what is under the 6...

bidask

@Boosibri said:
1861/0 it is

Thank you

@Abuelo said:
I am more intrigued by what is under the 6...

Dunnigan and Parker reference the
1860 do cp for general information on the overdate

Abuelo

Yes, not sure I agree.

bidask

Here is a better picture 10/01 Ds variety

This is a former Clyde Hubbard specimen 🤓

bidask

Came back properly attributed

So did this one:

And this one was properly given its right date.

Early_Milled_Latin_America

Great eye appeal on all 3 coins!!!

ncsuwolf74

Should have sent that 1851 DO in with the original invoice to have the provenance listing on the label. I didn't know this was ex Hubbard.