Home U.S. Coin Forum

Guess the grade

These coins are currently in encapsulation phase with PCGS so I will post the grade/photos when they are finished.

Comments

  • braddickbraddick Posts: 24,124 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I like it at AU55.

    peacockcoins

  • mannie graymannie gray Posts: 7,259 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Tough call from the images......sorry

  • bsshog40bsshog40 Posts: 3,907 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Yea pics are a little blurry. I'm in the AU 50-55 range.

  • SmudgeSmudge Posts: 9,545 ✭✭✭✭✭

    AU something.

  • JimnightJimnight Posts: 10,846 ✭✭✭✭✭

    AU.

  • blitzdudeblitzdude Posts: 5,975 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Pictures are too blurry, could be anywhere from a XF45 to a AU53. Maybe even a details-92. Congrats

    The whole worlds off its rocker, buy Gold™.
    BOOMIN!™

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Pictures too blurry.....Looks AU...but could be better.... Let us know when the grade comes in... Cheers, RickO

  • CalifornianKingCalifornianKing Posts: 1,259 ✭✭✭✭
    edited July 21, 2020 8:58AM

    @mannie gray said:
    Tough call from the images......sorry

    @ricko said:
    Pictures too blurry.....Looks AU...but could be better.... Let us know when the grade comes in... Cheers, RickO

    @blitzdude said:
    Pictures are too blurry, could be anywhere from a XF45 to a AU53. Maybe even a details-92. Congrats

    Is this better? It's a open 3 right?

  • SmudgeSmudge Posts: 9,545 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Looks open 3. 55-58 from the photos which are still fuzzy. Try GTG again with the Trueview.

  • mannie graymannie gray Posts: 7,259 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @CalifornianKing said:

    @mannie gray said:
    Tough call from the images......sorry

    @ricko said:
    Pictures too blurry.....Looks AU...but could be better.... Let us know when the grade comes in... Cheers, RickO

    @blitzdude said:
    Pictures are too blurry, could be anywhere from a XF45 to a AU53. Maybe even a details-92. Congrats

    Is this better? It's a open 3 right?

    Yes, open 3, but no, not really any better pictures.
    Try laying the coin flat on a white surface with good lighting.

  • CalifornianKingCalifornianKing Posts: 1,259 ✭✭✭✭

    @mannie gray said:

    @CalifornianKing said:

    @mannie gray said:
    Tough call from the images......sorry

    @ricko said:
    Pictures too blurry.....Looks AU...but could be better.... Let us know when the grade comes in... Cheers, RickO

    @blitzdude said:
    Pictures are too blurry, could be anywhere from a XF45 to a AU53. Maybe even a details-92. Congrats

    Is this better? It's a open 3 right?

    Yes, open 3, but no, not really any better pictures.
    Try laying the coin flat on a white surface with good lighting.

    I cannot do it since it's at PCGS. I am going off old pictures.

  • mannie graymannie gray Posts: 7,259 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @CalifornianKing said:

    @mannie gray said:

    @CalifornianKing said:

    @mannie gray said:
    Tough call from the images......sorry

    @ricko said:
    Pictures too blurry.....Looks AU...but could be better.... Let us know when the grade comes in... Cheers, RickO

    @blitzdude said:
    Pictures are too blurry, could be anywhere from a XF45 to a AU53. Maybe even a details-92. Congrats

    Is this better? It's a open 3 right?

    Yes, open 3, but no, not really any better pictures.
    Try laying the coin flat on a white surface with good lighting.

    I cannot do it since it's at PCGS. I am going off old pictures.

    Ok... we'll just have to wait and see what they say.
    The halos around the stars have me thinking it may have been cleaned at some point.
    For you, hoping that is not the case.

  • CalifornianKingCalifornianKing Posts: 1,259 ✭✭✭✭

    @mannie gray said:

    @CalifornianKing said:

    @mannie gray said:

    @CalifornianKing said:

    @mannie gray said:
    Tough call from the images......sorry

    @ricko said:
    Pictures too blurry.....Looks AU...but could be better.... Let us know when the grade comes in... Cheers, RickO

    @blitzdude said:
    Pictures are too blurry, could be anywhere from a XF45 to a AU53. Maybe even a details-92. Congrats

    Is this better? It's a open 3 right?

    Yes, open 3, but no, not really any better pictures.
    Try laying the coin flat on a white surface with good lighting.

    I cannot do it since it's at PCGS. I am going off old pictures.

    Ok... we'll just have to wait and see what they say.
    The halos around the stars have me thinking it may have been cleaned at some point.
    For you, hoping that is not the case.

    Hope not aswell. The dealer guaranteed that it will grade clean. So hope I don't have to msg him and say that it did not.

  • VPOLYMATHVPOLYMATH Posts: 6
    edited July 21, 2020 2:48PM

    Hope he didn’t actually say it “would grade cleaned”

  • skier07skier07 Posts: 4,008 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @CalifornianKing said:

    @mannie gray said:

    @CalifornianKing said:

    @mannie gray said:

    @CalifornianKing said:

    @mannie gray said:
    Tough call from the images......sorry

    @ricko said:
    Pictures too blurry.....Looks AU...but could be better.... Let us know when the grade comes in... Cheers, RickO

    @blitzdude said:
    Pictures are too blurry, could be anywhere from a XF45 to a AU53. Maybe even a details-92. Congrats

    Is this better? It's a open 3 right?

    Yes, open 3, but no, not really any better pictures.
    Try laying the coin flat on a white surface with good lighting.

    I cannot do it since it's at PCGS. I am going off old pictures.

    Ok... we'll just have to wait and see what they say.
    The halos around the stars have me thinking it may have been cleaned at some point.
    For you, hoping that is not the case.

    Hope not aswell. The dealer guaranteed that it will grade clean. So hope I don't have to msg him and say that it did not.

    Unless you’re an expert do yourself and your wallet a favor, don’t buy raw gold coins. For the same price or maybe a few dollars more you could have bought one in a TPG slab already.

  • HighReliefHighRelief Posts: 3,674 ✭✭✭✭✭

    AU55

  • ashelandasheland Posts: 23,236 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Sadly it appears cleaned. The luster breaks around the stars makes me think AU details.

  • CalifornianKingCalifornianKing Posts: 1,259 ✭✭✭✭

    @VPOLYMATH said:
    Hope he didn’t actually say it “would grade cleaned”

    He said it would be a non details grade

  • HydrantHydrant Posts: 7,773 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 22, 2020 9:40AM

    AU. It looks cleaned.

  • CalifornianKingCalifornianKing Posts: 1,259 ✭✭✭✭

    @braddick said:
    I like it at AU55.

    You hit it on the dot.
    https://www.pcgs.com/cert/39510533

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file