Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

PSA 10 error?

handymanhandyman Posts: 5,347 ✭✭✭✭✭

Yes the card is centered but all 4 corners show wear and even worse the back has a giant stain.
Must be a labeling error right? Still selling for big money though. Maybe Im wrong and hard to see the image. But he says it is flawless in hand. Top right looks pretty bad to me. The cert before it was for a PSA 6 1973 Carl Yaz.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/1970-Topps-10-Carl-Yastrzemski-Red-Sox-HOF-PSA-10-GEM-MINT-Absolutely-Flawless/373086389010?hash=item56ddae8312:g:mQ8AAOSwNK5e6ifv

Comments

  • nam812nam812 Posts: 10,580 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I agree that there is far too much corner wear to be a PSA 10. As for it still selling for big money, that's easy......TRIAPD.

  • orioles93orioles93 Posts: 3,474 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If I sent that in I would expect to get a 5-7. That's pretty bad.

    What I Collect:

    PSA HOF Baseball Postwar Rookies Set Registry- (Currently 80.51% Complete)


    PSA Pro Football HOF Rookie Players Set Registry- (Currently 19.80% Complete)


    PSA Basketball HOF Players Rookies Set Registry- (Currently 6.02% Complete)
  • brad31brad31 Posts: 2,789 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Wow! I usually think people are overreacting when they post a 10 that shouldn’t be. Usually I feel like it is a very strong card that is not perfect and I would love to own but not at a 10 price. This one has four soft corners and I would guess it would be a 7.

  • handymanhandyman Posts: 5,347 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 25, 2020 4:27AM

    Do not forget the large black wax stain on the back. Super odd. Which is a main quality a 10 must never have.

  • dennis07dennis07 Posts: 1,842 ✭✭✭

    I like my $12 card better.

    Collecting 1970 Topps baseball
Sign In or Register to comment.