PSA 10 error?

Options
handyman
handyman Posts: 5,702 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited June 24, 2020 7:03PM in Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Yes the card is centered but all 4 corners show wear and even worse the back has a giant stain.
Must be a labeling error right? Still selling for big money though. Maybe Im wrong and hard to see the image. But he says it is flawless in hand. Top right looks pretty bad to me. The cert before it was for a PSA 6 1973 Carl Yaz.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/1970-Topps-10-Carl-Yastrzemski-Red-Sox-HOF-PSA-10-GEM-MINT-Absolutely-Flawless/373086389010?hash=item56ddae8312:g:mQ8AAOSwNK5e6ifv

Comments

  • nam812
    nam812 Posts: 10,608 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I agree that there is far too much corner wear to be a PSA 10. As for it still selling for big money, that's easy......TRIAPD.

  • orioles93
    orioles93 Posts: 3,550 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    If I sent that in I would expect to get a 5-7. That's pretty bad.

    What I Collect:

    PSA HOF Baseball Postwar Rookies Set Registry- (Currently 82.54% Complete)


    PSA Pro Football HOF Rookie Players Set Registry- (Currently 21.47% Complete)
  • brad31
    brad31 Posts: 3,051 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Wow! I usually think people are overreacting when they post a 10 that shouldn’t be. Usually I feel like it is a very strong card that is not perfect and I would love to own but not at a 10 price. This one has four soft corners and I would guess it would be a 7.

  • handyman
    handyman Posts: 5,702 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 25, 2020 5:27AM
    Options

    Do not forget the large black wax stain on the back. Super odd. Which is a main quality a 10 must never have.

  • dennis07
    dennis07 Posts: 1,842 ✭✭✭
    Options

    I like my $12 card better.

    Collecting 1970 Topps baseball

Categories