There must be a LOT of people who have a lot of partial sets or other to get me that high !!
I think it’s based on those stupid medals or trophies or whatever they call them, not on your actual card collection. Not sure though.
Yaz Master Set#1 Gino Cappelletti master set#1 John Hannah master set
Also collecting: 1964 Venezuelan Topps, Patriots team HOFers, Andre Tippett, 1968 Venz Red Sox, 1974 Topps Sox
Yeah, it is based on the defined criteria to earn the medals. Many different criteria based on Completion, Collection, Competition and community. You don’t have to buy cards and build sets to earn some of the points.
But yes, they points really don’t get you anything.
PSA Digital Albums - Ken Griffey, Jr. - Basic Set | Rookie Set | 1989 SetGuides Authored - Graded Card Scanning Guide PDF | History of the PSA Label PDF
I moved up 40 spots by starting a De'Aaron Fox rookie set. I have a Prizm Fox, 1, and zero plans to add any more Fox RCs period. Yet, 40 spot improvement. Spanner in the works of the ranking criteria.
"Nobody ever defended anything successfully, there is only attack and attack and attack some more. "
"I shall return"