Morgan Dollar - - - Good, Bad, or Ugly
ajaan
Posts: 17,421 ✭✭✭✭✭
PCGS slab
DPOTD-3
'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'
CU #3245 B.N.A. #428
Don
0
ajaan
Posts: 17,421 ✭✭✭✭✭
DPOTD-3
'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'
CU #3245 B.N.A. #428
Don
Comments
I think it depends on the light.
Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc
Good--the strike (it's an O mint)
Some tough obverse marks.
The image of the toned obverse is not flattering.
RMR: 'Wer, wenn ich schriee, hörte mich denn aus der Engel Ordnungen?'
CJ: 'No one!' [Ain't no angels in the coin biz]
Reverse looks nice. Obverse looks cleaned in the field to the left of liberty. Toning looks like vomit. Photo doesn’t allow for much else to be said.
hmm. good obv but splotchy.
Can it be all 3?
.
Good condition
Bad color
Kinda ugly
More bad than good due to the nasty, nothing a quick dip couldn't fix. Congrats!
The whole worlds off its rocker, buy Gold™.
BOOMIN!™
Ugly
I'll go with GOOD. With the right lighting I'd bet it's an attractive coin. Bad lighting and photography can make a good coin look horrible.
Not for me.
Looking for Top Pop Mercury Dime Varieties & High Grade Mercury Dime Toners.
Not bad!
Not crazy about it from the pictures. Really need a better look at the toning on the obverse.
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
Seller's photos. That's all I have.
DPOTD-3
'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'
CU #3245 B.N.A. #428
Don
Really nice strike, but if it looks like the photos it wouldn't be for me.
My Collection of Old Holders
Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
If that’s all you have, if you have interest in it, why?
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
Good!
"Jesus died for you and for me, Thank you,Jesus"!!!
--- If it should happen I die and leave this world and you want to remember me. Please only remember my opening Sig Line.Pass. Don't reward sellers that post bad pictures.
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
the obverse is too "neutral" from the photos. It has a chance to be good, but an even higher chance of being ugly
It’s fugly. But based on the O, it might be an O/S. And if it is, it’s a sweet cherry pick
For those interested, here is the PCGS slab:
DPOTD-3
'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'
CU #3245 B.N.A. #428
Don
For my collecting interests, it is ugly.... I just do not care for the tarnish and smudged prints on the obverse....the grade appears OK, though I would have said 64 based on the pictures...Cheers, RickO
Sorry, ugly+....
For me, it is ugly. I would pass on it. It wouldn’t surprise me, either, if it was MS66 but was knocked down a grade for the negative eye appeal.
TurtleCat Gold Dollars
Not for me.
My YouTube Channel
If you look up the cert number there are much better pics on the Heritage site. Much different there and the obverse had some nice toning. It depends on the price but I kinda like it based on the Heritage pics.
I don't care for it. I consider it unattractive.
Without the toning hiding some marks on the obverse, I think it would be in a 64 holder.