Home World & Ancient Coins Forum
Options

Question on this 1807 4 Reales...

Does this coin look okay to you ? The area I believe is the mint mark is more of a blob, so wanted to get some more eyes on it. What do you guys think of it? Thanks for any input!


Comments

  • Options
    BoosibriBoosibri Posts: 11,877 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I would be very skeptical. Since it’s raw I would suggest doing a specific gravity test to see if it is even silver.

  • Options
    AbueloAbuelo Posts: 1,761 ✭✭✭✭✭

    This is, I think, a Potosi mark. But I woul agree with @Boosibri

  • Options
    ajaanajaan Posts: 17,125 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Boosibri said:
    I would be very skeptical. Since it’s raw I would suggest doing a specific gravity test to see if it is even silver.

    How many people here can calculate SP?


    DPOTD-3
    'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'

    CU #3245 B.N.A. #428


    Don
  • Options
    BoosibriBoosibri Posts: 11,877 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Ok> @ajaan said:

    @Boosibri said:
    I would be very skeptical. Since it’s raw I would suggest doing a specific gravity test to see if it is even silver.

    How many people here can calculate SP?

    If you have a scale, some string, a container and YouTube I’m sure anyone here can figure it out.

  • Options
    pcgs69pcgs69 Posts: 4,266 ✭✭✭✭

    I gave specific gravity a test. I'm sure it's not 100% flawless but this is what I got:
    Weight 13.16 grams
    gravity of 1.3
    SG of 10.12

  • Options
    BoosibriBoosibri Posts: 11,877 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That’s about right for 0.900 silver

  • Options
    jayPemjayPem Posts: 4,050 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Potosi mint marks came out blobular sometimes...😜

  • Options
    realeswatcherrealeswatcher Posts: 364 ✭✭✭

    SG is actually a bit low for ~ .900 silver, but the piece presents as genuine (look at other 1807 Potosi examples and you'll see that blobbish mintmark isn't out of the ordinary). SG could be some process error, plus I dont really trust Potosi alloying to be perfect around this time.

    Perhaps relatedly, though this is really just my casual observation, some of the Potosi 4R around this time seem to... well, not have stood up to circulation well. That is, some seem to just be rather scuzzy... like the metal wasn't super-resistant to environmental exposure. Again, that's anecdotal.


    PS - There actually IS a pretty convincing circulated-looking Chinese fake of the scarce date 1809 Charles IIII Potosi 4R to be aware of.

  • Options
    jgennjgenn Posts: 738 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I hate to sound like a broken record but is the edge design correct and does it look like it was impressed on a parallel edging mill?

  • Options
    pcgs69pcgs69 Posts: 4,266 ✭✭✭✭

    @jgenn said:
    I hate to sound like a broken record but is the edge design correct and does it look like it was impressed on a parallel edging mill?

    Is this image ok? I can try to get more if you’d like.

  • Options
    jgennjgenn Posts: 738 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited April 30, 2020 5:41PM

    So we are looking for evidence that the edge was made by a parallel edging mill. Here's a link to a post from Bob Gurney about how such a device leaves telltale overlaps of the edge design.

Sign In or Register to comment.