Home World & Ancient Coins Forum

Question on this 1807 4 Reales...

Does this coin look okay to you ? The area I believe is the mint mark is more of a blob, so wanted to get some more eyes on it. What do you guys think of it? Thanks for any input!


Comments

  • BoosibriBoosibri Posts: 12,255 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I would be very skeptical. Since it’s raw I would suggest doing a specific gravity test to see if it is even silver.

  • AbueloAbuelo Posts: 1,843 ✭✭✭✭✭

    This is, I think, a Potosi mark. But I woul agree with @Boosibri

  • ajaanajaan Posts: 17,464 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Boosibri said:
    I would be very skeptical. Since it’s raw I would suggest doing a specific gravity test to see if it is even silver.

    How many people here can calculate SP?


    DPOTD-3
    'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'

    CU #3245 B.N.A. #428


    Don
  • BoosibriBoosibri Posts: 12,255 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Ok> @ajaan said:

    @Boosibri said:
    I would be very skeptical. Since it’s raw I would suggest doing a specific gravity test to see if it is even silver.

    How many people here can calculate SP?

    If you have a scale, some string, a container and YouTube I’m sure anyone here can figure it out.

  • pcgs69pcgs69 Posts: 4,336 ✭✭✭✭

    I gave specific gravity a test. I'm sure it's not 100% flawless but this is what I got:
    Weight 13.16 grams
    gravity of 1.3
    SG of 10.12

  • BoosibriBoosibri Posts: 12,255 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That’s about right for 0.900 silver

  • jayPemjayPem Posts: 4,081 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Potosi mint marks came out blobular sometimes...😜

  • realeswatcherrealeswatcher Posts: 415 ✭✭✭

    SG is actually a bit low for ~ .900 silver, but the piece presents as genuine (look at other 1807 Potosi examples and you'll see that blobbish mintmark isn't out of the ordinary). SG could be some process error, plus I dont really trust Potosi alloying to be perfect around this time.

    Perhaps relatedly, though this is really just my casual observation, some of the Potosi 4R around this time seem to... well, not have stood up to circulation well. That is, some seem to just be rather scuzzy... like the metal wasn't super-resistant to environmental exposure. Again, that's anecdotal.


    PS - There actually IS a pretty convincing circulated-looking Chinese fake of the scarce date 1809 Charles IIII Potosi 4R to be aware of.

  • jgennjgenn Posts: 744 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I hate to sound like a broken record but is the edge design correct and does it look like it was impressed on a parallel edging mill?

  • This content has been removed.
  • pcgs69pcgs69 Posts: 4,336 ✭✭✭✭

    @jgenn said:
    I hate to sound like a broken record but is the edge design correct and does it look like it was impressed on a parallel edging mill?

    Is this image ok? I can try to get more if you’d like.

  • jgennjgenn Posts: 744 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited April 30, 2020 5:41PM

    So we are looking for evidence that the edge was made by a parallel edging mill. Here's a link to a post from Bob Gurney about how such a device leaves telltale overlaps of the edge design.

Sign In or Register to comment.