Home Precious Metals

Gold has ZERO counterparty risk.

topstuftopstuf Posts: 14,803 ✭✭✭✭✭

Just posting to clear the issue.
Gold is an element. It requires nothing else to make it gold.
No one anywhere has to do (or not do) anything to make it be gold.

That's it. Have fun. :)

Comments

  • derrybderryb Posts: 36,821 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Gold transactions may involve counterparty risk unless they are the "hand me the cash, I hand you the gold" type.

    "Interest rates, the price of money, are the most important market. And, perversely, they’re the market that’s most manipulated by the Fed." - Doug Casey

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Gold is good,
    Gold is money,
    Gold will get you things for your honey...
    :D Cheers, RickO

  • cohodkcohodk Posts: 19,122 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @derryb said:
    Gold transactions may involve counterparty risk unless they are the "hand me the cash, I hand you the gold" type.

    And determining the "value or amount of cash (or good or service)" between the parties. There is risk the 2 parties will not agree to the value or terms.

    If i agree with derryb to trade my cow to him for an ounce of gold, but jmski says he will give me 2 ounces of gold for that same cow, then derryb has just been exposed to and realized counterparty risk.

    Otherwise....the OP could substitute the word "zinc" or "iron" for "gold" and his comments would read the same.

    Just posting to clear the issue.
    Zinc is an element. It requires nothing else to make it zinc.
    No one anywhere has to do (or not do) anything to make it be zinc

    Excuses are tools of the ignorant

    Knowledge is the enemy of fear

  • derrybderryb Posts: 36,821 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited April 9, 2020 7:11AM

    Your cow example is proof that counterparty risk exists ONLY after TWO parties have agreed on terms, but have not yet completed those terms. The counterparty risk lies in one of the two parties not fulfilling the agreed upon terms. While there is risk in just about any single thing, counterparty risk requires two parties.

    While gold in my safe faces some risk, the only time it faces counterparty risk is when I involve a second party. If I have a second party store my gold in their "secure" vault, then there is counterparty risk.

    "Interest rates, the price of money, are the most important market. And, perversely, they’re the market that’s most manipulated by the Fed." - Doug Casey

  • derrybderryb Posts: 36,821 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @bronco2078 said:
    im going to need more info on this cow before i trade an ounce for it. Does it talk or do card tricks or something?

    Like the guy above trading it, it produces hot air that can be converted to fuel.

    "Interest rates, the price of money, are the most important market. And, perversely, they’re the market that’s most manipulated by the Fed." - Doug Casey

  • topstuftopstuf Posts: 14,803 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Gold has no counterparty risk.

    Injecting a TRANSACTION into the analysis just makes it idiotic.

  • cohodkcohodk Posts: 19,122 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @topstuf said:
    Gold has no counterparty risk.

    Injecting a TRANSACTION into the analysis just makes it idiotic.

    Whew. Good. As long as we never trade our gold for anything there is no risk. Whoohoo.

    Excuses are tools of the ignorant

    Knowledge is the enemy of fear

  • derrybderryb Posts: 36,821 ✭✭✭✭✭

    transactions have counterparty risk, whether they involve gold, cows or hot air. When another party is involved with a promise to be fulfilled, there will always be counterparty risk until that promise is fulfilled.

    "Interest rates, the price of money, are the most important market. And, perversely, they’re the market that’s most manipulated by the Fed." - Doug Casey

  • topstuftopstuf Posts: 14,803 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'm done. I'm going to get some fresh air. Stupidity is tiring.
    I hope the air counterparty is in a good mood.

  • derrybderryb Posts: 36,821 ✭✭✭✭✭

    let's argue about what a "transaction" is.

    "Interest rates, the price of money, are the most important market. And, perversely, they’re the market that’s most manipulated by the Fed." - Doug Casey

  • cohodkcohodk Posts: 19,122 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited April 9, 2020 8:06AM

    @bronco2078 said:
    im going to need more info on this cow before i trade an ounce for it. Does it talk or do card tricks or something?

    The typical slaughtered beef yields about 500 pounds of finshed meat product. Its pretty hard to find any beef at the store for under $4/pound, thus rendering the value of said cow to be about $2000.

    Derryb should have offered more for the cow. Now he has an empty tummy and an element with no counterparty risk. Jmski has a nice fully belly. Cohodk is now just like derryb with an element (but twice as much), and hes also hungry.

    Excuses are tools of the ignorant

    Knowledge is the enemy of fear

  • cohodkcohodk Posts: 19,122 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @derryb said:

    While gold in my safe faces some risk, the only time it faces counterparty risk is when I involve a second party. If I have a second party store my gold in their "secure" vault, then there is counterparty risk.

    So it has no value unless a transaction is made. And in order to conduct a transaction you need another party--a counter party.

    Im glad topstuf has now joined you in realizing this.

    Excuses are tools of the ignorant

    Knowledge is the enemy of fear

  • cohodkcohodk Posts: 19,122 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @topstuf said:
    Gold has no counterparty risk.

    Injecting a TRANSACTION into the analysis just makes it idiotic.

    Every definition of counter party includes the word "transaction".

    Google it.

    Excuses are tools of the ignorant

    Knowledge is the enemy of fear

  • derrybderryb Posts: 36,821 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited April 9, 2020 8:14AM

    @cohodk said:

    Every definition of counter party includes the word "transaction".

    Except yours. Maybe you are wrong?

    @cohodk said:

    @derryb said:

    While gold in my safe faces some risk, the only time it faces counterparty risk is when I involve a second party. If I have a second party store my gold in their "secure" vault, then there is counterparty risk.

    So it has no value unless a transaction is made.

    Of course it has value, that's why it's in my safe. While I may need another party to determine sale price, I alone can assign value. Sale price will depend on where the two parties agree on value.

    "Interest rates, the price of money, are the most important market. And, perversely, they’re the market that’s most manipulated by the Fed." - Doug Casey

  • cohodkcohodk Posts: 19,122 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited April 9, 2020 8:36AM

    My definition specifically uses the word transaction, for without a transaction, the value of everything is simply utilitarian and probably useless.

    Suppose you list an AGE on ebay for $1 and no one buys it...essentially the value is zero.

    Now, of course that wouldnt happen in the world we know today, but in the world the preppers and doomsayers prepare for, this scenario is plausible.

    My case here was simply that gold does have counterparty risk. If you wish to ignore that then fine, but since you usually find risk in everything, i find your reluctance to accept this to be a bit baffling.

    Excuses are tools of the ignorant

    Knowledge is the enemy of fear

  • cohodkcohodk Posts: 19,122 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @derryb said:

    Of course it has value...While I may need another party to determine sale price, I alone can assign value.

    And "your assigned value" is worth less than a cup of coffee. You need another party to agree to value. Thats the risk. If you cannot agree to value and conduct a transaction, your gold goes back into the safe to collect dust.

    You can assign a value to anything you want, but without another party to confirm that value, the item is worthless.

    You take risk in assuming another party will give your item the same value and you take risk in simply finding another party.

    Excuses are tools of the ignorant

    Knowledge is the enemy of fear

  • tincuptincup Posts: 5,139 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I must be living in Bizarro World.... goes with the times I suppose.

    ----- kj
  • jmski52jmski52 Posts: 22,849 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If i agree with derryb to trade my cow to him for an ounce of gold, but jmski says he will give me 2 ounces of gold for that same cow, then derryb has just been exposed to and realized counterparty risk.

    It doesn't matter if jmski comes along after the deal is made and offers a better deal for the cow. The deal is over and there's no counterparty in sight. A deal's a deal and there's no bank intermediary holding title, collecting arbitrage or interest, and no agency involved in certifying the deal. The transaction took place and the cow & gold exchanged hands on the spot. No counterparty, just primary parties to the deal, which is over. Done. Fini. Completed. No counterparties were involved.

    Derryb should have offered more for the cow. Now he has an empty tummy and an element with no counterparty risk. Jmski has a nice fully belly. Cohodk is now just like derryb with an element (but twice as much), and hes also hungry.

    And cohodk reneged on a done deal. Hmmmmmm.

    So it has no value unless a transaction is made. And in order to conduct a transaction you need another party--a counter party.

    Gold has value to its owner, however he chooses to value it. It's not rocket science.

    Every definition of counter party includes the word "transaction".
    Google it.

    Your "transactions" always assume a third party. My gold or your gold doesn't depend on anyone else to be gold.

    Q: Are You Printing Money? Bernanke: Not Literally

    I knew it would happen.
  • derrybderryb Posts: 36,821 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited April 9, 2020 9:44AM

    @cohodk said:

    You can assign a value to anything you want, but without another party to confirm that value, the item is worthless.

    You should probably quit while your behind.

    "Interest rates, the price of money, are the most important market. And, perversely, they’re the market that’s most manipulated by the Fed." - Doug Casey

  • HJPHJP Posts: 423 ✭✭✭

    The fact of the matter is, the published spot price of gold is fiction.

    Those who are in "control" of this magic number are corrupt. One reason is the US and other governments allows this corruption to exist is because it serves the purpose of undermining the confidence in alternative forms of "money" (that bypasses the fiat money system - at least at the taxation level).

    How can individuals and groups dampen governments ability to act corruptly?

    Seems to me, in places like CA where the state governments debt obligations far outweigh the state’s ability to ever repay, it would not take about 3-4 months of severe reduction in state tax revenue to bring the entire state government to a halt.

    How long before the voice of those who care about honesty and fairness, goodwill and integrity will be heard?

    We are humans first, mothers and fathers to our children next, custodians of earth third and citizens of our respective nations, fourth. These must be our priorities - if we are to survive and thrive.

    Let’s not forget the order of these priorities.

    HJP

  • cladkingcladking Posts: 28,656 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @topstuf said:
    Just posting to clear the issue.
    Gold is an element. It requires nothing else to make it gold.
    No one anywhere has to do (or not do) anything to make it be gold.

    That's it. Have fun. :)

    Unfortunately this isn't true any longer.

    These markets are completely manipulated and the manipulators will blame gold owners when things go wrong. The government already doesn't like gold owners because they are using money that could be in bonds (a loan to the government), cash (a loan to the government), or stocks (a loan to the government). The bankers will have their stooges in Washington pass onerous windfall profit taxes and other restrictions on any potential profit. The bankers will keep their profits and bonuses for thinking up the new regulations.

    Tempus fugit.
  • topstuftopstuf Posts: 14,803 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @cladking said:

    @topstuf said:
    Just posting to clear the issue.
    Gold is an element. It requires nothing else to make it gold.
    No one anywhere has to do (or not do) anything to make it be gold.

    That's it. Have fun. :)

    Unfortunately this isn't true any longer.

    It IS true. And I'm reneging on my promise to stay out of this thread.
    PRICE has....nothing....to do with the composition of the gold.

    And....furthermore.... uh......oh phooey.
    No use.

    ^&%$^#^^^^*(^$^^

  • derrybderryb Posts: 36,821 ✭✭✭✭✭

    "Interest rates, the price of money, are the most important market. And, perversely, they’re the market that’s most manipulated by the Fed." - Doug Casey

Sign In or Register to comment.