Home U.S. Coin Forum

Is this an Error Coin?

MedalCollectorMedalCollector Posts: 1,975 ✭✭✭✭✭

Is this an error coin?

Comments

  • AUandAGAUandAG Posts: 24,762 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Struck through? I really don't know but it looks cool. I'd keep it if I found it.

    bob :)

    Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
  • astroratastrorat Posts: 9,221 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It looks to be a delamination.

    Numismatist Ordinaire
    See http://www.doubledimes.com for a free online reference for US twenty-cent pieces
  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 46,137 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @astrorat said:
    It looks to be a delamination.

    Agree. It looks like a lamination that came detached. I consider this to be a major error although I'm not sure if it's worth the cost of slabbing. Very cool error and well worth keeping. B)

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I think (operative word) it looks more like a struck through than delamination....Would like to see an input from @FredWeinberg on this one....Cheers, RickO

  • seanqseanq Posts: 8,655 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Possibly, but need to see the reverse. If it is normally struck then it is likely a struck through or lamination as others have suggested. Reverse surface deformation matching the obverse would indicate damage after the strike.

    I would lean toward struck-through, as the surface is too regular and straight to be a lamination.

    Sean Reynolds

    Incomplete planchets wanted, especially Lincoln Cents & type coins.

    "Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
  • ctf_error_coinsctf_error_coins Posts: 15,433 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Yes, show the other side.

  • ifthevamzarockinifthevamzarockin Posts: 8,865 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Lamination

  • BStrauss3BStrauss3 Posts: 3,416 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'm down for struck through (wood), but I'm usually wrong...

    -----Burton
    ANA 50 year/Life Member (now "Emeritus")
  • MedalCollectorMedalCollector Posts: 1,975 ✭✭✭✭✭

    :)

  • Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Based on the reverse and the weakness beside the mark, I vote mint error.

  • ctf_error_coinsctf_error_coins Posts: 15,433 ✭✭✭✭✭

    PMD, IMO based on the reverse photo.

  • MWallaceMWallace Posts: 4,097 ✭✭✭✭✭
  • amwldcoinamwldcoin Posts: 11,269 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Let the Battle begin! >:)

  • seanqseanq Posts: 8,655 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Thank you for the additional picture, I now believe your coin is post mint damage, IMHO someone arced electricity across the coin causing the copper to melt.

    Sean Reynolds

    Incomplete planchets wanted, especially Lincoln Cents & type coins.

    "Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
  • silverpopsilverpop Posts: 6,679 ✭✭✭✭✭

    major PMD not a error coin

  • MedalCollectorMedalCollector Posts: 1,975 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If it’s PMD, then I overpaid. My thoughts were that this was struck on a defective planchet.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file