Home U.S. Coin Forum

Thoughts on this strike thru.

ironmanl63ironmanl63 Posts: 1,973 ✭✭✭✭✭

Should this straight grade? If it did would it stop you from purchasing the coin? The coin is otherwise very attractive.


Comments

  • ironmanl63ironmanl63 Posts: 1,973 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 3, 2020 5:07PM

    Any thoughts on what caused the depression?

  • Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Something hard. Straight grade with notation: "Strike Thru" and a nice one!

  • Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭

    PS It is interesting that the area is not toned indicating something stayed on the coin for awhile. Otherwise it is punch damaged but I don't believe that because the revers is not affected.

  • JBKJBK Posts: 15,813 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Insider2 said:
    PS It is interesting that the area is not toned indicating something stayed on the coin for awhile. Otherwise it is punch damaged but I don't believe that because the revers is not affected.

    Agree. Also. No sign of displaced metal around the depression.

  • TwoKopeikiTwoKopeiki Posts: 9,736 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Looks PMD to me, but seeing the surfaces of the depression under high magnification would be all that's needed for a conclusive diagnostic.

  • KliaoKliao Posts: 5,608 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Looks like a struck through. Nice coin!

    Collector
    75 Positive BST transactions buying and selling with 45 members and counting!
    instagram.com/klnumismatics

  • ironmanl63ironmanl63 Posts: 1,973 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I actually bought the coin based on the true view. I did not know it had a strike thru. Shows you how much lighting makes a difference photoing coins. The strike thru is not noted on the label and the coin is straight graded. MS64. I like the coin and was wondering if folks would see it as a negative or positive.

  • nk1nknk1nk Posts: 477 ✭✭✭✭

    Is there a piece of metal in the holder? It looks like it was intact when the true views were taken.

    Nick

  • ironmanl63ironmanl63 Posts: 1,973 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @nk1nk said:
    Is there a piece of metal in the holder? It looks like it was intact when the true views were taken.

    Nick

    No there is not. It is strictly a lighting issue. As you twirl the coin in the light it almost disappears and reappears.

  • KliaoKliao Posts: 5,608 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ironmanl63 said:

    @nk1nk said:
    Is there a piece of metal in the holder? It looks like it was intact when the true views were taken.

    Nick

    No there is not. It is strictly a lighting issue. As you twirl the coin in the light it almost disappears and reappears.

    Well that’s kinda neat!

    Collector
    75 Positive BST transactions buying and selling with 45 members and counting!
    instagram.com/klnumismatics

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I can actually see the strike through in the TruView... the outline is definitely there... but not bright as in the OP...Very interesting... Thanks for showing us... Cheers, RickO

  • fivecentsfivecents Posts: 11,207 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 4, 2020 7:13AM

    If it's a real strike thru it will be body bagged as planchet flaw unless you submit under mint error tier.

    Why did the strike thru not tone like the rest of the coin?

  • FredWeinbergFredWeinberg Posts: 5,866 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It looks like a lamination to me.

    The shiny area is from the 'flake' of metal
    falling off the coin after it was struck, imo.

    Retired Collector & Dealer in Major Mint Error Coins & Currency since the 1960's.Co-Author of Whitman's "100 Greatest U.S. Mint Error Coins", and the Error Coin Encyclopedia, Vols., III & IV. Retired Authenticator for Major Mint Errors for PCGS. A 50+ Year PNG Member.A full-time numismatist since 1972, retired in 2022.
  • ironmanl63ironmanl63 Posts: 1,973 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @fivecents said:
    If it's a real strike thru it will be body bagged as planchet flaw unless you submit under mint error tier.

    Why did the strike thru not tone like the rest of the coin?

    It is toned like the rest of the coin. In my photo the light hits the coin in such away that the flaw is shiny. In the true view it is not shiny and shows the toning.

  • ironmanl63ironmanl63 Posts: 1,973 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @FredWeinberg said:
    It looks like a lamination to me.

    The shiny area is from the 'flake' of metal
    falling off the coin after it was struck, imo.

    This might be true as I have no idea how it was created. Any reason PCGS would have straight graded the coin with out noting the condition.

    Would this be collectible as an error?

  • ironmanl63ironmanl63 Posts: 1,973 ✭✭✭✭✭

    This is a link to the actual auction. Looking at it now I can see the depression in the slab shot. At the time I was more into the color in the tru view and overlooked the slab shot.

    https://auctions.stacksbowers.com/lots/view/3-BN1YD/1937-d-buffalo-nickel-ms-64-pcgs

  • fivecentsfivecents Posts: 11,207 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 4, 2020 7:36AM

    Ironman answered my question..thanks!

  • ironmanl63ironmanl63 Posts: 1,973 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @fivecents said:

    That's why the area wasn't toned like the rest of the coin. The toned lamination fell off maybe?

    The color of the depression is really close to the color of the rest of the coin when held at the right angle to the light. Overall it is "shinier" than the rest of the coin.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file