Home U.S. Coin Forum

Lest see some shiny new 2020 Coins!

ambro51ambro51 Posts: 13,807 ✭✭✭✭✭

A sweet Roosevelt 2020 P from the Grocery store change! Does anyone get these things graded ;-) ?

Comments

  • coinbufcoinbuf Posts: 11,422 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ambro51 said:
    A sweet Roosevelt 2020 P from the Grocery store change! Does anyone get these things graded ;-)

    Only when they are errors found in the Walmart parking lot. :#

    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
  • ms70ms70 Posts: 13,954 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ambro51 said:
    A sweet Roosevelt 2020 P from the Grocery store change! Does anyone get these things graded ;-)

    Nothing but proofs right now on eBay.

    Great transactions with oih82w8, JasonGaming, Moose1913.

  • happycollectinghappycollecting Posts: 264 ✭✭✭✭

    Not worth grading, since the Mint made so many these days.

  • JimnightJimnight Posts: 10,846 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I haven't seen a 2020 yet of any coin.

  • OnastoneOnastone Posts: 3,993 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Same here, not a single new 2020 in circulation around here either.

  • coinbufcoinbuf Posts: 11,422 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @happycollecting said:
    Not worth grading, since the Mint made so many these days.

    100% false, right now there are those that deal in moderns searching rolls and bags looking for the highest grades to submit, registry collectors of modern series will pay the premium to get these early to keep their top spots in the registries.

    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
  • ThreeCentSilverFLThreeCentSilverFL Posts: 1,688 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Full bands? Sweet!

  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,269 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The Mint's Engraving Department has to consider the widths of the individual date digits when it dates the new Master Die for each year. 1's are narrow and everything else is full width. Quite often when they go from a date that does not have a 1, say 1940 as an example, to a date that does, such as 1941, they adjust the position of the third digit to compensate for this. Then when they would go from 1941 to 1942 they would have to adjust the position of the third digit back again. This is why the 1942/41-P&D dimes have the 4 strongly doubled, while the 1943/42-P nickel does not.

    We just went from 2019 to 2020, and it sure looks like they pushed that second 0 very close to the rim to make way for the second 2. Can anybody do an overlay of photos of a 2019 date with a 2020 to see if the overall length of the date increased?

    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • happycollectinghappycollecting Posts: 264 ✭✭✭✭
    edited February 15, 2020 2:45PM

    @coinbuf said:

    @happycollecting said:
    Not worth grading, since the Mint made so many these days.

    100% false, right now there are those that deal in moderns searching rolls and bags looking for the highest grades to submit, registry collectors of modern series will pay the premium to get these early to keep their top spots in the registries.

    I agree to what you said about CRH for MS67 or MS68, which would worth slabbing for good prices. However, the OP mentioned getting the coin from grocery store change. I wonder if we'll get high grade coins, like MS66 or above, from such channel without contact marks.

  • coinbufcoinbuf Posts: 11,422 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @happycollecting said:

    @coinbuf said:

    @happycollecting said:
    Not worth grading, since the Mint made so many these days.

    100% false, right now there are those that deal in moderns searching rolls and bags looking for the highest grades to submit, registry collectors of modern series will pay the premium to get these early to keep their top spots in the registries.

    I agree to what you said about CRH for MS67 or MS68, which would worth slabbing for good prices. However, the OP mentioned getting the coin from grocery store change. I wonder if we'll get high grade coins, like MS66 or above, from such channel without contact marks.

    I would say that while not super common it could be done with the right circumstances, fresh roll right from the fed yes I think its possible. I pulled all my statehood qtrs. from circulation and one or two have a shot at 66 or better.

    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
  • WaterSportWaterSport Posts: 6,821 ✭✭✭✭✭

    2020 ?? I am just grateful there will not be a handful of extra cents issued in 2020! I just got my last of the 2019's last week. Proof 70 if anyone cares.


    Proud recipient of the coveted PCGS Forum "You Suck" Award Thursday July 19, 2007 11:33 PM and December 30th, 2011 at 8:50 PM.
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Not found in change... but a 2020....Cheers, RickO

  • ashelandasheland Posts: 23,257 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nothing yet in change but this:

  • OverdateOverdate Posts: 7,034 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited February 17, 2020 8:14AM

    @CaptHenway said:
    The Mint's Engraving Department has to consider the widths of the individual date digits when it dates the new Master Die for each year. 1's are narrow and everything else is full width. Quite often when they go from a date that does not have a 1, say 1940 as an example, to a date that does, such as 1941, they adjust the position of the third digit to compensate for this. Then when they would go from 1941 to 1942 they would have to adjust the position of the third digit back again. This is why the 1942/41-P&D dimes have the 4 strongly doubled, while the 1943/42-P nickel does not.

    We just went from 2019 to 2020, and it sure looks like they pushed that second 0 very close to the rim to make way for the second 2. Can anybody do an overlay of photos of a 2019 date with a 2020 to see if the overall length of the date increased?

    From looking at pictures of 2010 and 2019 dimes, it appears that the last digit is further from the rim than on the 2020.

    The date on the 2001 cent would have benefited from leaving some space between each of the digits.

    Edit: The 2000 dime shows the last 0 further from the rim than the 2020. Possibly all the digits of the 2000 were packed closer together. The 2001 dime has much better positioning of the 1 than the 2001 cent.

    My Adolph A. Weinman signature :)

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file