Home U.S. Coin Forum

Error experts please help describe this coin

ctf_error_coinsctf_error_coins Posts: 15,433 ✭✭✭✭✭

This is a complicated major error coin. I like to get a full exact description when possible.

I will go ahead a give my description upfront and see if you agree ...

Triple saddle struck on a split planchet after first strike with reverse mirror brockage and uniface strike.

Comments

  • ctf_error_coinsctf_error_coins Posts: 15,433 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Note: the photo doesn't really show the bend of the saddle strike.

  • SonorandesertratSonorandesertrat Posts: 5,695 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 21, 2020 12:41PM

    That is an I-want-it-in-my-collection error. ;)

    Member: EAC, NBS, C4, CWTS, ANA

    RMR: 'Wer, wenn ich schriee, hörte mich denn aus der Engel Ordnungen?'

    CJ: 'No one!' [Ain't no angels in the coin biz]
  • mannie graymannie gray Posts: 7,259 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @CaptHenway said:
    "1958-?"

    The ultra rare mule.

  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,270 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I can buy the split after first strike with the reverse half of the coin (would love to know the weight) remaining in the coining chamber split side up.

    I can see the lower second strike in both images being a full brockage from maybe a second or third impression.

    On the two upper right images from the second, saddle strike, that sure looks like the bottom edge of the Memorial above the kinda smooshed down "oF." How do you get that on a uniface strike?

    TD

    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • JBKJBK Posts: 15,720 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Had to stop thinking about it - I was getting a headache.

  • ctf_error_coinsctf_error_coins Posts: 15,433 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 21, 2020 1:36PM

    @CaptHenway said:
    I can buy the split after first strike with the reverse half of the coin (would love to know the weight) remaining in the coining chamber split side up.

    I can see the lower second strike in both images being a full brockage from maybe a second or third impression.

    On the two upper right images from the second, saddle strike, that sure looks like the bottom edge of the Memorial above the kinda smooshed down "oF." How do you get that on a uniface strike?

    TD

    I do not see the bottom of the Memorial building. To me, it looks like the rim of the split strike getting distorted. Follow it from outside the second saddle strike.

  • SullivanNumismaticsSullivanNumismatics Posts: 842 ✭✭✭✭
    edited January 21, 2020 2:08PM

    It is a saddle strike with a uniface reverse on a uniface obverse split planchet before strike. Neat coin.

    The split planchet is fully struck and has the "brockage-like" appearance because it had another planchet on top of it when it was struck, which allowed for the underlying split planchet to receive a "full strike" on its reverse.

    The top planchet was the ejected, as was the split planchet. The split planchet was then saddle struck with a planchet underneath both of the "saddle strikes." Again, no brockage, just the silhouette effect from having a "full strike" on a nearly paper thin planchet.

    www.sullivannumismatics.com Dealer in Mint Error Coins.
  • ctf_error_coinsctf_error_coins Posts: 15,433 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @SullivanNumismatics said:
    It is a saddle strike with a uniface reverse on a uniface obverse split planchet before strike. Neat coin.

    Jon, I see a mirror brockage on one of the saddle stikes, do you?

  • @ErrorsOnCoins said:

    @SullivanNumismatics said:
    It is a saddle strike with a uniface reverse on a uniface obverse split planchet before strike. Neat coin.

    Jon, I see a mirror brockage on one of the saddle stikes, do you?

    I don't, it's just the "silhouette" effect of having an extremely strong strike (split+normal planchet in the striking chamber), which caused the "brockage" like appearance.

    www.sullivannumismatics.com Dealer in Mint Error Coins.
  • ctf_error_coinsctf_error_coins Posts: 15,433 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 21, 2020 2:21PM

    @SullivanNumismatics said:

    @ErrorsOnCoins said:

    @SullivanNumismatics said:
    It is a saddle strike with a uniface reverse on a uniface obverse split planchet before strike. Neat coin.

    Jon, I see a mirror brockage on one of the saddle stikes, do you?

    I don't, it's just the "silhouette" effect of having an extremely strong strike (split+normal planchet in the striking chamber), which caused the "brockage" like appearance.

    The reverse of each of the saddle strike looks different too me.

    IMO, one saddle strike looks like a mirror brockage (which I have many examples of ) and the underlying detail from the first strike also shows because of the thinness of the split planchet. For the other saddle strike, the uniface on a blank planchet just shows the detail from the first strike and none from the opposite saddle strike.

  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,270 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @SullivanNumismatics said:
    It is a saddle strike with a uniface reverse on a uniface obverse split planchet before strike. Neat coin.

    The split planchet is fully struck and has the "brockage-like" appearance because it had another planchet on top of it when it was struck, which allowed for the underlying split planchet to receive a "full strike" on its reverse.

    The top planchet was the ejected, as was the split planchet. The split planchet was then saddle struck with a planchet underneath both of the "saddle strikes." Again, no brockage, just the silhouette effect from having a "full strike" on a nearly paper thin planchet.

    OK, I agree with you.

    The two off center saddle strikes are embossed strikes, not brockage strikes.
    As I said, I would like to know the weight to see just how thin this really is.

    It is odd that the rim above "oF" as well as the "oF" itself appear to be pushed INWARD on the original image, but that is because it is OUTWARDS on the second, saddle strike.

    Very neat error!

    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • ctf_error_coinsctf_error_coins Posts: 15,433 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Ok, I see it now and I agree to the "embossed" strike and not a brockage strike.

    One of the saddle strike reverses is weaker with the obverse image than the other, that is what thew me off.

    Thank You.

  • JimnightJimnight Posts: 10,846 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I see a very nice error.

  • BuffaloIronTailBuffaloIronTail Posts: 7,482 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @goldfixer21 said:
    How about "Friday Fun at the US Mint After the Boss Has Left "

    I get a headache when I look at that coin.

    Pete

    "I tell them there's no problems.....only solutions" - John Lennon
  • CRH4LIFECRH4LIFE Posts: 849 ✭✭✭✭

    Mint employee special

  • blitzdudeblitzdude Posts: 6,013 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Sorry, not an error expert but personally I'd call it a mess.

    Wouldn't believe it's an "error" at all. Looks like employee got bored during his/her break.

    The whole worlds off its rocker, buy Gold™.
    BOOMIN!™

  • ctf_error_coinsctf_error_coins Posts: 15,433 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @blitzdude said:
    Sorry, not an error expert but personally I'd call it a mess.

    Wouldn't believe it's an "error" at all. Looks like employee got bored during his/her break.

    Completely understandable if you think about the minting process.

    IMO, no way an employee created midnight piece, just unfounded speculation.

  • scubafuelscubafuel Posts: 1,873 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I’ll take a guess at the date: 1964

  • markelman1125markelman1125 Posts: 1,852 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Oy vey, what happened to that one 😱

  • BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @scubafuel said:
    I’ll take a guess at the date: 1964

    Looks like a 1963-64 mint employee manufactured error to me too.

    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Wow.... That would take some talent to manufacture, actually, I would think it unlikely that it was intentional....I do see how it may have occurred, after reading the final explanation....I could not have deduced that entire sequence myself....Sure did learn something here...Cheers, RickO

  • derrybderryb Posts: 36,988 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Machine Jam.

    The government is incapable of ever managing the economy. That is why communism collapsed. It is now socialism’s turn - Martin Armstrong

  • @CaptHenway said:

    @SullivanNumismatics said:
    It is a saddle strike with a uniface reverse on a uniface obverse split planchet before strike. Neat coin.

    The split planchet is fully struck and has the "brockage-like" appearance because it had another planchet on top of it when it was struck, which allowed for the underlying split planchet to receive a "full strike" on its reverse.

    The top planchet was the ejected, as was the split planchet. The split planchet was then saddle struck with a planchet underneath both of the "saddle strikes." Again, no brockage, just the silhouette effect from having a "full strike" on a nearly paper thin planchet.

    OK, I agree with you.

    The two off center saddle strikes are embossed strikes, not brockage strikes.
    As I said, I would like to know the weight to see just how thin this really is.

    It is odd that the rim above "oF" as well as the "oF" itself appear to be pushed INWARD on the original image, but that is because it is OUTWARDS on the second, saddle strike.

    Very neat error!

    I like the term "embossed strikes", describes it well!

    www.sullivannumismatics.com Dealer in Mint Error Coins.
  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,270 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The date range can actually be narrowed down further to 1959-1972 by the size of the designer's initials on the reverse, which were small 1959-1972, large 1973 only, and medium 1974-2008.

    I think the piece is legit.

    TD

    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • CRH4LIFECRH4LIFE Posts: 849 ✭✭✭✭

    198x :D. All seriousness though a cool piece. > @scubafuel said:

    I’ll take a guess at the date: 1964

  • TurboSnailTurboSnail Posts: 1,668 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 22, 2020 3:37PM

    Happy hour at west village NYC. (buy one get two free)

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file