Home U.S. Coin Forum

What has been your experience with pcgs giving the PL designation on gold?

Have you been successful?

Comments

  • superpsychmdsuperpsychmd Posts: 1,291 ✭✭✭

    Anyone?

  • superpsychmdsuperpsychmd Posts: 1,291 ✭✭✭

    Ttt

  • HemisphericalHemispherical Posts: 9,370 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 11, 2020 9:57AM

    Have not attempted to submit any Au for the PL designation.

    But wanted to add the PCGS announcement about more coins eligible for the PL designation on July 2, 2019, “ (Santa Ana, California) – Any and all qualifying mint state United States and world coins, as well as tokens and medals submitted to Professional Coin Grading Service (www.PCGS.com), are now eligible to receive the desirable designation, Prooflike (PL)....”

    https://www.pcgs.com/news/pcgs-announcement-about-prooflike

    And the definition as written in the above link, “According to PCGS standards, a coin’s surface is Prooflike when there is a clear reflection in the fields on both sides as viewed from two to four inches away. A cloudy effect or striations may impede the reflectivity.”

  • RINATIONALSRINATIONALS Posts: 171 ✭✭✭

    Saw a Type 3 $1 gold with the PL on the holder in the FUN auction yesterday, it passed at I think a little over double bid for non PL price.
    Haven't had anything to try yet, sold a $5 Lib that might have worked a couple years ago

    buying Rhode Island Nationals please email, PM or call 401-295-3000
  • logger7logger7 Posts: 8,588 ✭✭✭✭✭

    They are tighter in their criteria than the competition.

  • ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,352 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 11, 2020 2:18PM

    I haven’t decided to submit or wait to see if they will offer DPML more broadly.

  • GoldminersGoldminers Posts: 4,137 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I have found a very small percentage of what I thought were proof-like, have been graded that way of several that I have sent in lately. I say it has to be pretty exceptional to get that designation.

  • ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,352 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Goldminers said:
    I have found a very small percentage of what I thought were proof-like, have been graded that way of several that I have sent in lately. I say it has to be pretty exceptional to get that designation.

    Do you think PCGS PL more along the lines of ATS DPL?

  • GoldminersGoldminers Posts: 4,137 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Zoins said:

    @Goldminers said:
    I have found a very small percentage of what I thought were proof-like, have been graded that way of several that I have sent in lately. I say it has to be pretty exceptional to get that designation.

    Do you think PCGS PL more along the lines of ATS DPL?

    In general, yes. They have to be really good for a new PL especially.

    I still like some of mine that did not make it.

  • ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,352 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Goldminers said:

    @Zoins said:

    @Goldminers said:
    I have found a very small percentage of what I thought were proof-like, have been graded that way of several that I have sent in lately. I say it has to be pretty exceptional to get that designation.

    Do you think PCGS PL more along the lines of ATS DPL?

    In general, yes. They have to be really good for a new PL especially.

    I still like some of mine that did not make it.

    How does it compare to PCGS PL and DMPL for Morgans?

    Is PCGS PL for gold coins more like PCGS DMPL for Morgans?

  • GoldminersGoldminers Posts: 4,137 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Sorry, I do not know anything about Morgans to compare. Someone else is way more qualified for that answer.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file