Morgan GTG! Grade Posted.

marcmoish

@JBN said:

@marcmoish said:

@JBN said:

@marcmoish said:

@CCGGG said:
Second photos make it look better than the first. Could be a 64, even without a bath...

as for you, you should get spanked for that comment lol, this baby ain't never gettin a bath.

How was everyone off this much? I've never had that happen.

I recognized the quality of the fields and other positive attributes. I just cannot award gem status with such marks on Liberty's face.

I'll attempt to post some cheek scans tomm to show how it looks in hand. Then you can comment if its gem status etc.

The disparity of grades between 64 and 66 is big. It would not have graded 66+ or get beaned altogether, based on your comment.

I don't think I should be able to bean my own GTGs, but I'll do so: MS64+ CAC. It is a very nice coin. I'm glad you are happy with it.
I (and for me only) attempted to respond to your how was everyone off this much question. Congratulations on your dollar and please don't take my GTG and explanation adversely.

Thanks for the response, perhaps these scans I just posted helps somewhat.

Coinscratch

Not only do the fields look great but also the surface of the devices - minus hits of course - looks pristine.

asheland

Nice coin!

ChrisH821

Not that it matters but the initial pictures had me at 66

marcmoish

Thanks for all the comments and PM's - this was fun!

Bottom line buy the coin not the holder.

And have the coin you want seen in hand, a picture often doesn't positively or negatively tell the whole story.

TurtleCat

63 eh? I would guess the picture was hiding some of the imperfections.