1884-CC MS PLQ GTG with die crack rev at United states
Kkathyl
Posts: 3,762 ✭✭✭✭✭
Any thoughts on this Morgan. Line on neck is holder not on coin
Best place to buy !
Bronze Associate member
4
Any thoughts on this Morgan. Line on neck is holder not on coin
Best place to buy !
Bronze Associate member
Comments
Well it's an 1884 cc not a 1874 but I'm thinking a 63
HAPPY COLLECTING
Nice CC!
Die cracks on Morgan's are common, it might help you to find the vam for it if you are so inclined.
Thanks correction on date. It’s in a very old holder has great reflection and strike obviously the marks around observe take it down. Was also trying to find Vam
Best place to buy !
Bronze Associate member
Link to vam list
http://ec2-13-58-222-16.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com/wiki/1884-CC_VAMs
Love the CC's.
I vote 63 as well.
It looks approximately 62+ and non-PL to me.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
63 maybe 64 hard to tell from the pics
not pl at all
Ike Specialist
Finest Toned Ike I've Ever Seen, been looking since 1986
One of my favorite CC dates!
I like it as a 63
yup...........63.
"“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)
"I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)
63, lot's of chatter on the obv... Very nice rev though
I don't understand "PLQ" and I think I understand lots of the common and accepted Hobby acronyms/abbreviations/shorthand.
Stab in the dark - Proof Like Quality?
A 63. Nice coin
It appears to be a 63 with the chatter on the obverse....the shadow on the obverse could be concealing, so maybe a 62....Cheers, RickO
I agree, NOT even close to PL. I hope it is not TPG'ed as one!
Mark, I'm going to use your post as a point of discussion. It took me a while to realize that a coin graded
MS-63 by a major TPGS may not be my personal MS-63. A 63 can have lots of detracting marks in the PFA.
The marks on this coin APPEAR light and scattered. The luster on original CC $ often accounts for a little more "grace" when assigning a grade. I'm going to guess it is in a 63 holder. Probably not much difference in price between 62+ and 63-C.
EDIT Looked again. This coin COULD even sneak into a 64 slab if it is a "blazer."
PCI holder? Someone else?
Very routine looking CC dollar to me. I don' t know about the VAM
If that is in a PCI holder from the 90's - grading was different. PCI would have put that into an MS-64 slab.
Happy Thanksgiving!
I was just guessing. It looks a little like the old PCI holders. It can't be NGC unless the OP is just trying to suggest it is very undergraded.
Did the OP ever say what grade was on the holder?
63
Ditto
It is a guess the grade.
Have you attributed the Vam yet Kk? @ifthevamzarockin and I are awaiting your findings!
Learning process for me on the Vam .... Nice Morgan though
I like 63.
I was thinking PCI holder as well, maybe 62PQ or 63?
Collector, occasional seller
Same here. 62+