Home Precious Metals

Metal Porn Friday...with something kinda special :)

WeissWeiss Posts: 9,941 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited November 15, 2019 7:32AM in Precious Metals

Here's something you don't see every day, and may never see again:

Monumental coopered sterling silver tankard
London, 1775, John Carter II*
8.25" tall, 5" wide at base
Capacity/Volume 1.6 quarts (.4 gallon)
43.2 troy ounces (approximately 3 pounds)

We are like children who look at print and see a serpent in the last letter but one, and a sword in the last.
--Severian the Lame

Comments

  • Downtown1974Downtown1974 Posts: 6,796 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 15, 2019 7:27AM

    Holy cow, Weiss!!! Now you can enjoy a nice IPA and tone your biceps all at the same time.
    Beautiful piece!

  • ashelandasheland Posts: 23,189 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Weiss, that’s SWEET!

  • WeissWeiss Posts: 9,941 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Thank you, gentlemen.
    This piece is gargantuan. The seller didn't go out of their way to laud its size and showed nothing for comparison. So I knew it was big, but had no idea just how massive it was until it showed up yesterday.

    It holds nearly a half-gallon of beer :o

    We are like children who look at print and see a serpent in the last letter but one, and a sword in the last.
    --Severian the Lame
  • MsMorrisineMsMorrisine Posts: 33,077 ✭✭✭✭✭

    if there is a way to win Oktoberfest, then this is it

    Current maintainer of Stone's Master List of Favorite Websites // My BST transactions
  • MeltdownMeltdown Posts: 8,792 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Barndog said:

    @Weiss said:
    Thank you, gentlemen.
    This piece is gargantuan. The seller didn't go out of their way to laud its size and showed nothing for comparison. So I knew it was big, but had no idea just how massive it was until it showed up yesterday.

    It holds nearly a half-gallon of beer :o

    LEO: Have you been drinking?

    WEISS: I've had just one beer, officer.

    WEISS: Also, Do you have any Grey Poupon?

  • MeltdownMeltdown Posts: 8,792 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Downtown1974 said:
    @Meltdown great pic! Is that a drawer from an old library card catalog?

    It's one of four pull out drawers in my safe...

  • 1630Boston1630Boston Posts: 13,781 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Meltdown said:
    Crazy how heavy that tankard is... Very cool.
    Here's a quick shot I took a few days ago after picking up another roll.

    You don't see a $20 roll of halves often do you ?

    Successful transactions with : MICHAELDIXON, Manorcourtman, Bochiman, bolivarshagnasty, AUandAG, onlyroosies, chumley, Weiss, jdimmick, BAJJERFAN, gene1978, TJM965, Smittys, GRANDAM, JTHawaii, mainejoe, softparade, derryb

    Bad transactions with : nobody to date

  • MeltdownMeltdown Posts: 8,792 ✭✭✭✭✭

    No. They're pretty scarce I think.

  • BaleyBaley Posts: 22,660 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Meltdown said:
    No. They're pretty scarce I think.

    40 coin roll of 1964 Kennedy halves?

    Used to have 2 of them.
    Opened 1, still have the other..

    Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry

  • 1630Boston1630Boston Posts: 13,781 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Meltdown said:
    No. They're pretty scarce I think.

    I agree, nice stash

    Successful transactions with : MICHAELDIXON, Manorcourtman, Bochiman, bolivarshagnasty, AUandAG, onlyroosies, chumley, Weiss, jdimmick, BAJJERFAN, gene1978, TJM965, Smittys, GRANDAM, JTHawaii, mainejoe, softparade, derryb

    Bad transactions with : nobody to date

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Weiss....That is a tankard to be proud of.....Indeed, you should sell me that other tankard I like so much, since now you have the Big Kahuna of all silver tankards... ;) Cheers, RickO

  • johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 28,330 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Ive never seen a roll of $20 halfs before either. what time era were they used?

  • MeltdownMeltdown Posts: 8,792 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Well, that's a 1964 Kennedy roll so certainly around then. I'm not sure other than that.
    photo IMG_0028-1.jpg
    photo IMG_0027-1.jpg

  • renman95renman95 Posts: 7,037 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That tankard's a real champ.

  • carew4mecarew4me Posts: 3,471 ✭✭✭✭

    TANK!ard


    Loves me some shiny!
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Weiss ....Nothing but crickets.... :D Cheers, RickO

  • LukeMarshallLukeMarshall Posts: 1,982 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I got a ten sided French Jeton (Decagon) to go with my two eight sided octogons

    @ricko said:
    @Weiss ....Nothing but crickets.... :D Cheers, RickO

    That's probably due to the amount of research I've been doing on silver tankards... These things are cool!! I'm with you Ricko, one day

    Nice beast tankard Weiss!!
    You have to get a barrel style to round out your collection ( no pun intended :D )

    Example - not mine

    It's all about what the people want...

  • metalmeistermetalmeister Posts: 4,586 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I need one of those tankards to take to our local beer fests.
    Awesome!

    email: ccacollectibles@yahoo.com

    100% Positive BST transactions
  • WeissWeiss Posts: 9,941 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @LukeMarshall said:

    Nice beast tankard Weiss!!
    You have to get a barrel style to round out your collection ( no pun intended :D )

    Yep. It's a nice piece. The new "coopered" style is a more subtle version of that barrel mug.
    That one's been on the market for at least a couple of years now. Unfortunately as it was made in 1794, it's way outside of my scope of collecting pieces that were created before 1776.

    We are like children who look at print and see a serpent in the last letter but one, and a sword in the last.
    --Severian the Lame
  • mannie graymannie gray Posts: 7,259 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @johnny9434 said:
    Ive never seen a roll of $20 halfs before either. what time era were they used?

    I have seen them up to 1969-D.
    Not later.
    I have not seen a $20 roll of c/n coins.
    I used to see the $20 rolls quite a bit years ago, usually 1964/64-D.
    Started seeing less and less of them after the late 1990s.
    I'm confident they may still be hard to find but likely quite a few are lurking in collections/accumulations.

  • LukeMarshallLukeMarshall Posts: 1,982 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 18, 2019 1:28PM

    @Weiss said:
    Yep. It's a nice piece. The new "coopered" style is a more subtle version of that barrel mug.
    That one's been on the market for at least a couple of years now. Unfortunately as it was made in 1794, it's way outside of my scope of collecting pieces that were created before 1776.

    Okay, I get it... Keeping it colonial.

    Interesting, during my research it mentions some of these tankard designs originating in the early 1600's, fascinating the evolution of designs able to be dated through hallmarks.

    I didn't get a silver christening cup as a child so I'm thinking a full size tankard from the year of my birth may be a on the bucket list for me.

    Congrats again, they are all spectacular

    It's all about what the people want...

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Weiss....It would be great to see a full picture of your tankard collection.....You do have some great pieces. Cheers, RickO

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Weiss.....Thank you very much... Beautiful tankards.... While I especially like the Francis Spillsbury, I would be happy with the James Phipps....(since the date is "...outside of my scope of collecting pieces that were created before 1776."... ;) Cheers, RickO

  • WeissWeiss Posts: 9,941 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ricko said:
    @Weiss.....Thank you very much... Beautiful tankards.... While I especially like the Francis Spillsbury, I would be happy with the James Phipps....(since the date is "...outside of my scope of collecting pieces that were created before 1776."... ;) Cheers, RickO

    Indeed. I referenced the Phipps anomaly in the US Coin forum. The longer version is that after i * just * missed an early coopered piece in 2015 or 2016 by William Holmes (1774), a pretty exhaustive search turned up no other early examples of this style. Everything else that was on the market and came to the market thereafter was late 1780s to as late as 1800 or even later (there were a few exceptions, but they were just not attractive or absurdly overpriced). So I made an exception for Phipps, almost as a placeholder, because its design--even among the coopered style--was so radical and so far ahead of the curve that it looks like something from our time rather than from 200 years ago.

    I stumbled upon the most recent acquisition by accident, ironically from the same sellers who had the Holmes piece I missed (and whom I'd asked to contact me if they acquired another early coopered example). My first inclination was to sell the Phipps piece to subsidize the purchase of the Carter II tankard. But now I've grown fond the Phipps piece. Though it is not pre-1776, it is still "of the era". And I think it's a good point of contrast to show just how early the Carter II tankard is, predating Phipps by nearly 20 years.

    Here's the Phipps mug, 1793 vs. a similar sized mug by John Payne, 1774:

    We are like children who look at print and see a serpent in the last letter but one, and a sword in the last.
    --Severian the Lame
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Weiss....Thanks for your reply..... Nice comparison picture.... I thought maybe I would get you to sell the Phipps...Well, not really, but heck, worth a shot... :D Cheers, RickO

  • SmudgeSmudge Posts: 9,523 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @johnny9434 said:
    Ive never seen a roll of $20 halfs before either. what time era were they used.

    Are those called shotgun rolls?

  • ashelandasheland Posts: 23,189 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I never tire of seeing the Georgian silver! :love:

  • johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 28,330 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Smudge said:

    @johnny9434 said:
    Ive never seen a roll of $20 halfs before either. what time era were they used.

    Are those called shotgun rolls?

    ty

  • WeissWeiss Posts: 9,941 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @asheland said:
    I never tire of seeing the Georgian silver! :love:

    We are like children who look at print and see a serpent in the last letter but one, and a sword in the last.
    --Severian the Lame
Sign In or Register to comment.