Guess the Grade on the holder, 2 Buffs (GRADES REVEALED)

Click on the Image for a larger View.
14 is in PCGS
35 is in NGC
Of course as the owner I feel they are under graded. Especially the 35.
1
Click on the Image for a larger View.
14 is in PCGS
35 is in NGC
Of course as the owner I feel they are under graded. Especially the 35.
Comments
MS64, AU58
My Collection of Old Holders
Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
Same as above.
That 14S is nice, and a tough date to boot!
63
58
Collector
91 Positive BST transactions buying and selling with 56 members and counting!
instagram.com/klnumismatics
63, 55
That's an extraordinary strike on your '14-S. A very few '14-S, '15-S, and '16-S come this way.
Just to be different, I'll say 64 and 55.
63-55.
64
63
Beat me to it. I agree.
My War Nickels https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/nickels/jefferson-nickels-specialty-sets/jefferson-nickels-fs-basic-war-set-circulation-strikes-1942-1945/publishedset/94452
MS64 for the 1914-S which should be higher & AU58 for the 1935 because of the flat spots on the hip and flank the hair across the shoulder is not very defined either. I would say the 14-S should upgrade. As always just an opinion. Thanks for posting always glad to see buffaloes.
64 n 65
PCGS 64, NGC 63 respectively. Nice coins!
"It's like God, Family, Country, except Sticker, Plastic, Coin."
65 and 58. The 14-S is a Beaut!
Pete
65 and 55.....That '14S is really well struck....Cheers, RickO
65, 64 - like the look of the 14-S!
65,55
Both 65.
Collector, occasional seller
The cat is running low on air.
Thanks guys. Answer in the first post.
My thoughts were 64 on both. Although the 14 S is a little low on luster.
My images don't capture luster well but I try and capture the details.
Interesting. Both look better in the full slabbed pictures, even with the glare.
Someone screwed the pooch on that 14-S. It's at least a 65. Look at the strike. Look at the fields.
IMHOP - I personally don't care if it isn't blast, or toned, or whatever.
The 35 HAS rub. I guess it's called a 62-Rub.
Pete
The 35 is a 58 to me, but I guessed that it was holdered as a 63.
Doesn't really matter....the color will sell it anyway.
I also think the first coin is undergraded.
The $1000 spread between 4 and 5 is likely why it's in a 4 holder.
You know the deal....it has to be a 6 to be a 5, a 7 to be a 6,etc.
I disagree with that "grading" (pricing) philosophy but the TPGs and the market don't care what I think.
Wow - I'm shocked - not sure why, however, as grading pictures is challenging.......thanks for the fun!