The graded example was a weak strike, so I am going to say XF40 possibly XF45.
The second example is struck better but has more wear, so I will say VF35.
Both coins are in the Vf35/Xf40 area. I’ve seen them slabbed somewhat inconsistently, but again we’re splitting hairs.
Top coin also looks a little ‘cleanly’.
Comments
The graded example was a weak strike, so I am going to say XF40 possibly XF45.
The second example is struck better but has more wear, so I will say VF35.
35
40
Both coins are in the Vf35/Xf40 area. I’ve seen them slabbed somewhat inconsistently, but again we’re splitting hairs.
Top coin also looks a little ‘cleanly’.
45/35 are my guesses respectively
VF 20
VF 30
I like the 2nd coin a bit better.
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
I was very close to this, the wear at the top of the date made me wonder if I'd expect 15 or go with a 20.
Close enough. I agree.
20+30 here. Lots of Walker gtg's lately.
25 and 40...
Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
15 & 25.
40 and 35
they both look about 40 to me.
25 and 30......they are close for sure....in hand it may be more definitive. Cheers, RickO
40
30
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
grades?
I'm sorry, I cannot grade you. Perhaps your mother can.
Regarding the coins, I'm in the 35ish camp.
"Got a flaming heart, can't get my fill"
:
Both coins are XF 40
For their grades, I would buy the raw coin but not the ICG coin, which has a too-smooth "look" I don't like at all.
20
30
No way i would accept the slabbed coin as anything close to XF40.