Options
1892 Columbus Half AT? Or Naturally Toned?
Clio
Posts: 488 ✭✭✭✭✭
Here's a newp I recently had imaged. by @FadeToBlack
Curious about y'alls thoughts on it. I would make a poll but I'm unsure how.
Cheers!
https://numismaticmuse.com/ My Web Gallery
The best collecting goals lie right on the border between the possible and the impossible. - Andy Lustig, "MrEureka"
2
Comments
nt
Instead of new discussion it’s a drop down from there
It looks ok to me.
Thanks! I'll have to remember that for next time.
https://numismaticmuse.com/ My Web Gallery
The best collecting goals lie right on the border between the possible and the impossible. - Andy Lustig, "MrEureka"
I think it is market acceptable toning, nice find!
Thanks man! Had to get one after you got yours haha
https://numismaticmuse.com/ My Web Gallery
The best collecting goals lie right on the border between the possible and the impossible. - Andy Lustig, "MrEureka"
Natural. Nice pictures.
Professional Numismatist. "It's like God, Family, Country, except Sticker, Plastic, Coin."
Nt. Not many would AT fingerprints, but don't want to give them any ideas.
NT but somewhat dark obv and the multiple fingerprints are distracting. One stray print would not be as serious or detract as much, in my view
Commems and Early Type
From the single set of images it looks natural to me. This issue is often found with various hues of blue across it.
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
looks from here
NT
NT if you are not yet convinced
NT here too!
My Original Song Written to my late wife-"Plus other original music by me"
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL8A11CC8CC6093D80
https://n1m.com/bobbysmith1
NT
Dave
MS64 details. MS63 net with PCGS for slightly dull surfaces.
You wouldn't be adding fingerprints. If you AT a con with fingerprints, that will happen.
I would vote NT.....I have seen Columbians with that type of tarnish....Cheers, RickO
Natural.