Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Should a for profit firm be able to offer their professional opinion on a coins grade for....

LuxorLuxor Posts: 514 ✭✭✭✭✭

......a fee, and then openly make a market for such coins in the open market? Isn't this exactly what the FTC(?) warned PCGS about many years back because some PCGS graders were also in the business of selling and/or making a market for the coins they may have also graded which amounts to a huge conflict? In fact, IIRC didn't PCGS enact a policy shortly after the warning that graders or finalizers cannot actively buy/sell or make a market for PCGS graded coins which still holds true today?

Your hobby is supposed to be your therapy, not the reason you need it.

Comments

  • bolivarshagnastybolivarshagnasty Posts: 7,352 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 27, 2019 6:29PM

    I guess the obvious question here is, do you know of a grader or finalizer buying or selling?

  • stmanstman Posts: 11,352 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Incoming.:)

    Please... Save The Stories, Just Answer My Questions, And Tell Me How Much!!!!!
  • MasonGMasonG Posts: 6,262 ✭✭✭✭✭

    There's a difference between saying "This is what I think about the assigned grade" and "This is the grade I'm assigning."

  • BoosibriBoosibri Posts: 12,391 ✭✭✭✭✭

    What’s the point of this hypothetical post? Or do you have something to share?

  • HemisphericalHemispherical Posts: 9,370 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Not quite correct based upon the LA Times article.

    Another company was warned for what the OP posted.

    Our host was warned for something else.

    https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1990-08-17-fi-864-story.html

    Now this thread needs one of these:

    :D

  • ifthevamzarockinifthevamzarockin Posts: 8,908 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Train wreck dead ahead! :D

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 14,739 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 27, 2019 7:24PM

    Yes, CAC should be be able to offer their opinion on NGC and PCGS coins and make markets in them, whether stickered or not. Ditto for anyone else who wants to charge a fee to evaluate NGC and PCGS coins and make a market in them.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 36,230 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:
    Yes, CAC should be be able to offer their opinion on NGC and PCGS coins and make markets in them, whether stickered or not. Ditto for anyone else who charges a fee to evaluate NGC and PCGS coins and make a market in them.

    Ouch. You used the C word. Lol

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 36,230 ✭✭✭✭✭

    There's a difference between PCGS and CAC. PCGS could intentionally details grade a coin and then buy it and regrade it. CAC is just putting an "acceptable" on an already graded coin.

    That said, there is a potential conflict if they bought raw and stickered them for profit. But I think the market would be short lived as they would lose the faith of the rest of the market pretty quickly.

    But as long as they are buying already stickered coins on the open market, the conflict is minor.

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 14,739 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @MFeld said:
    Yes, CAC should be be able to offer their opinion on NGC and PCGS coins and make markets in them, whether stickered or not. Ditto for anyone else who charges a fee to evaluate NGC and PCGS coins and make a market in them.

    Ouch. You used the C word. Lol

    I was just answering the question that I thought was being asked.😉

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 36,230 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @MFeld said:
    Yes, CAC should be be able to offer their opinion on NGC and PCGS coins and make markets in them, whether stickered or not. Ditto for anyone else who charges a fee to evaluate NGC and PCGS coins and make a market in them.

    Ouch. You used the C word. Lol

    I was just answering the question that I thought was being asked.😉

    That was my first thought also. It never ends well.

  • Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Ideally, I suppose a grading firm should be independent of everything. A strictly non-profit with expenses provided by endowment and anonymous donations. There would be no charge for services and the graders would be unknown, long time, knowledgeable professionals. A "secret club" at an unknown location whose parent company would be the ANA or some other large numismatic organization.

    There would be no reason to inflate grades or change from very strict standards as the opinion of dealers in the market would mean nothing. If you did not like their grade opinion, use one of the for-profit services and pay for the second opinion.

    Keep dreaming...:)

  • BBNBBN Posts: 3,761 ✭✭✭

    .

    @jmlanzaf said:
    There's a difference between PCGS and CAC. PCGS could intentionally details grade a coin and then buy it and regrade it. CAC is just putting an "acceptable" on an already graded coin.

    PCGS would never kill their reputation by doing something like this. Not to mention there would probably be all kinds of legal ramifications with this.


    Positive BST Transactions (buyers and sellers): wondercoin, blu62vette, BAJJERFAN, privatecoin, blu62vette, AlanLastufka, privatecoin

    #1 1951 Bowman Los Angeles Rams Team Set
    #2 1980 Topps Los Angeles Rams Team Set
    #8 (and climbing) 1972 Topps Los Angeles Rams Team Set
  • LuxorLuxor Posts: 514 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:
    There's a difference between PCGS and CAC. PCGS could intentionally details grade a coin and then buy it and regrade it. CAC is just putting an "acceptable" on an already graded coin.

    That said, there is a potential conflict if they bought raw and stickered them for profit. But I think the market would be short lived as they would lose the faith of the rest of the market pretty quickly.

    But as long as they are buying already stickered coins on the open market, the conflict is minor.

    So it's only a "minor" conflict if they offer a professional opinion on a coin for a fee and then make an active market with cash bids for such coins they find "acceptable"?

    Your hobby is supposed to be your therapy, not the reason you need it.

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 36,230 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Luxor said:

    @jmlanzaf said:
    There's a difference between PCGS and CAC. PCGS could intentionally details grade a coin and then buy it and regrade it. CAC is just putting an "acceptable" on an already graded coin.

    That said, there is a potential conflict if they bought raw and stickered them for profit. But I think the market would be short lived as they would lose the faith of the rest of the market pretty quickly.

    But as long as they are buying already stickered coins on the open market, the conflict is minor.

    So it's only a "minor" conflict if they offer a professional opinion on a coin for a fee and then make an active market with cash bids for such coins they find "acceptable"?

    It might not be a conflict at all. The only real conflict is if they are stickering coins just to sell them. If they buy and sell already stickered coins, there really isn't a conflict.

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 36,230 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @BBN said:
    .

    @jmlanzaf said:
    There's a difference between PCGS and CAC. PCGS could intentionally details grade a coin and then buy it and regrade it. CAC is just putting an "acceptable" on an already graded coin.

    PCGS would never kill their reputation by doing something like this. Not to mention there would probably be all kinds of legal ramifications with this.

    This is true, of course. But the potential conflict would exist which is why it is preferable that the people offering opinions not be in a position to profit from that opinion. They could also crack out and grade higher. Again, it would, if found out, kill their business. But it wouldn't be the first such fraud in the collectibles area.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file