Options
Toned 1920-S Walker, the rev is in-toned; like, don’t like?
KollectorKing
Posts: 4,820 ✭✭✭✭✭
0
Comments
I think it could grow on me
the left side terminal look is a bit much but overall nice coin 
The good thing about this one is that the toning is more distracting than the scratch in the RH field.
It's too dark for my liking. Strike looks decent. AU 58?
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
It's in a P64 holder.
Congrats.....so tough to grade from photos...Couldn't tell if the line down the center was rub or an un-toned area.
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
Thanks, but it's not mine. I like the strike, but the dark toning & scratch bothers me.
Nor for me...
Collector
91 Positive BST transactions buying and selling with 56 members and counting!
instagram.com/klnumismatics
Typical 1920-S. Strikes were horrible from San Fran in 1920. The Nickel is even worse.
I like it for what it is...............or isn't.
Pete
Not a DDO. That effect comes from overuse of the die, causing the letters to spread.
It's similar to the effect where MONTICELLO spreads on overused Jeffersons.
Pete
Fatigue die.
Looks like a nice coin....just not a fan of tarnish.....would pass on that one. Cheers, RickO
It’s toning not tarnish
Collector
91 Positive BST transactions buying and selling with 56 members and counting!
instagram.com/klnumismatics
To-MAY-toes, to-MAH-toes....colloquially the same thing, however, I prefer the technically correct term...
Remember, a skunk by any other name, would smell the same. Cheers, RickO
Pics of coin in hand