Options
Would this Morgan qualify as a Monster Toner?
Skrill90
Posts: 264 ✭✭✭
Just curious if this would qualify as a monster. Personally im suspicious of the toning, the colors seem very odd compared to what I have seen before. Would this qualify as a monster?
https://www.ebay.com/itm/HGR-1896-1-Morgan-Beautiful-RAINBOW-Toning-PCGS-MS-66-19291/143388397785?hash=item21629d50d9:g:-4MAAOSwQGNdhFjEhttps://rover.ebay.com/rover/1/711-53200-19255-0/1?icep_id=114&ipn=icep&toolid=20004&campid=5338461489&mpre=https%3A%2F%2Febay.com%2Fitm%2FHGR-1896-1-Morgan-Beautiful-RAINBOW-Toning-PCGS-MS-66-19291%2F143388397785%3Fhash%3Ditem21629d50d9%3Ag%3A-4MAAOSwQGNdhFjE
0
Comments
I'm not a collector of toned coins. Avoid all of them but if I were going to buy one, that's a nice rev on that one. Not sure what makes a toned coin a monster.
Can't really say, that reverse photo is juiced to the max. There is no way I'd buy anything from that seller with those kind of photo "skills".
10-4,
My Instagram picturesErik
My registry sets
Possibly if it really looks like that. Looks like old Heritage scanner pics to me.
Note the white obverse: Black background, normal looking label and slab. Fairly well balanced photo.
The reverse: Everything has a blue tint to it. And they decided NOT to include the label.
Agree the reverse photo is juiced to make it look "better" than it is.
I would not buy it unless the price was $10.... I would have to invest in solutions and time to remove the AT...which is likely not as good as the juiced picture. Cheers, RickO
Let's see, 1,815 in MS66. Average auction close around $300. That would be a negative. Especially when he's asking for MS67 price.
All those sellers pocs looked juice stay away IMHO
I would say it looks nice, but not "monster" nice. Photo looks like it has been adjusted to look better than what it really is.
It might be a reasonably handsome coin. But the photos are silly-stupid.
This is more likely.