My observations on the first one, the pictures did not show light lines on the obverse, the coin does not have the antique gold tone but more of a light toning. The two coins do not have the same grade and did not sell for the same.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
I have seen a lot of NGC $20 gold pieces that are properly graded, especially in their earlier holders. With an MS63 you expect considerable eye appeal, no wear good luster, no real problems. If you are going to pay $1900 for a 91-s in MS63 it should be all there. The MS62 coin sold for a little under $1700 which is still a substantial premium for the coin. With the ebay fees these have to sell at a big premium to be pay for the 10% or so fees.
Comments
If pics are accurate #1
First one.
LIBERTY SEATED DIMES WITH MAJOR VARIETIES CIRCULATION STRIKES (1837-1891) digital album
My observations on the first one, the pictures did not show light lines on the obverse, the coin does not have the antique gold tone but more of a light toning. The two coins do not have the same grade and did not sell for the same.
Whichever one that could shed the ‘S’ on the reverse.
siliconvalleycoins.com
Door #2 please
1st one I like better
facially cleaner
1
i like the reverse side of coin on the 2nd one better
1st one
The first coin is more attractive IMHO.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
Second coin: https://www.ebay.com/itm/1891-s-20-DOUBLE-EAGLE-pcgs-MS62-/133140017551?nma=true&si=6pNez4EU8QuHXBZ45nlPxp75YS4%3D&orig_cvip=true&nordt=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557
First: https://www.ebay.com/itm/1891-S-Gold-20-Liberty-Double-Eagle-Graded-MS63-by-NGC-/264420214029?_trksid=p2047675.l2557&ssPageName=STRK:MEBIDX:IT&nma=true&si=6pNez4EU8QuHXBZ45nlPxp75YS4%3D&orig_cvip=true&nordt=true&rt=nc
Second was better deal, probably a cac candidate. The first is a low end 63, pictures are not really true to the reality.
I like the first one better myself.
Second was better deal, probably a cac candidate. The first is a low end 63, pictures are not really true to the reality.
How do you know ?
The 1st coin
Based on pictures, I prefer the first one.....Though they both have chatter....Cheers, RickO
I like the second one better.
My YouTube Channel
1.
I have seen a lot of NGC $20 gold pieces that are properly graded, especially in their earlier holders. With an MS63 you expect considerable eye appeal, no wear good luster, no real problems. If you are going to pay $1900 for a 91-s in MS63 it should be all there. The MS62 coin sold for a little under $1700 which is still a substantial premium for the coin. With the ebay fees these have to sell at a big premium to be pay for the 10% or so fees.
Just nice slabbed gold classic or mods close to melt.
On those coins shown like first one the other a no go definitely a C coin imo. Avoid coins with spots.
The 1st would be my choice.
Dave
I like the first one the best.
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
I would forgo both....keep looking for a nicer example even at AU58. You can find stunning examples at AU58 or above...but it takes time.