39-D walker... [update] [true view added]

steveben

my son and i visited 7 coin stores last week as sort of an end of summer thing to do. we had a great time. we came up with is this 39-D walker. we think maybe it's worth submitting for reconsideration...what do you think? (those purple dots are from the camera)

MFeld

The coin looks to have lines on a good sized portion of the right obverse field, some haze or light splotchiness there, as well and some disturbances on, above and beneath Liberty’s left (to viewer’s right) hand. The good news is that I don’t see a single flaw on the reverse.😉

Walkerfan

Looks nice for the grade. Strike is a bit soft in the center but that is typical for the 39-D. It looks like it was dipped and the luster is a little muted. I don't think it will upgrade but it's a very nice 66 that looks great in that OGH.

ricko

Very nice Walker.... Are the lines/haze perhaps on the slab? What does the reverse look like? Cheers, RickO

steveben

no, there is no haze on the coin. the 'marks' you see are probably toning (above IGWT and near L I).

i take kinda lousy photos to be doing this...but...

here are a couple more:

Smudge

I think 66 is about right.

LindeDad

I don't see it upgrading more than maybe a +.

mannie gray

I don't see upgrade potential from the images.

Jimnight

Nice coin.

WinLoseWin

No way that I could judge what to do from those photos. Looks like a coin that would need to be viewed in person to decide.

What do you grade it?

I'm wondering if some of the lines in the right field could be die polish lines which are often seen on the 1939-D.

logger7

Would try a cac submission.

As many dealers have told me even on nice coins like this, "just don't take it out of that holder".

steveben

@WinLoseWin said:

>

What do you grade it?

I'm wondering if some of the lines in the right field could be die polish lines which are often seen on the 1939-D.

I think it's 66+. It looks like lines but it's brown toning near igwt

steveben

upgraded to 66+

Hemispherical

@steveben said:
upgraded to 66+

Congrats! And many thanks for the followup post!

mannie gray

@steveben said:

@WinLoseWin said:

>

What do you grade it?

I'm wondering if some of the lines in the right field could be die polish lines which are often seen on the 1939-D.

I think it's 66+. It looks like lines but it's brown toning near igwt

Good call.

Unknown

This content has been removed.

ricko

Congratulations on the upgrade and thanks for letting us know...Cheers, RickO

johnny9434

it looks decent, I kinda like it

steveben

true view added

mannie gray

The true view makes coin pop and looks flashy and PQ, while first pic makes it look dull and washed out.
I am assuming that the TV is more accurate.

Walkerfan

@mannie gray said:
The true view makes coin pop and looks flashy and PQ, while first pic makes it look dull and washed out.
I am assuming that the TV is more accurate.

Yes, the TV shows a distinct luster band in the obverse, right-facing field.

steveben

@mannie gray said:
The true view makes coin pop and looks flashy and PQ, while first pic makes it look dull and washed out.
I am assuming that the TV is more accurate.

photography is not one of my strong points ;-)

mannie gray

@steveben said:

@mannie gray said:
The true view makes coin pop and looks flashy and PQ, while first pic makes it look dull and washed out.
I am assuming that the TV is more accurate.

photography is not one of my strong points ;-)

Nor is it mine.

ms70

I like it.