Home U.S. Coin Forum

Weird surface on gold coin (picture of saint)...What is it?

ReadyFireAimReadyFireAim Posts: 1,825 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited August 7, 2019 3:53AM in U.S. Coin Forum

I've seen it several times and my 16-S has a little bit of it.
I was calling it watery because it kind of looks like ripples on a pond when you move the light.
(not my coin)

(my coin)

Comments

  • Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Several dates in the teens have a similar surface. There appears to be a chemical residue on yours also.

  • 7Jaguars7Jaguars Posts: 7,433 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Orange peel was what I was taught...

    Love that Milled British (1830-1960)
    Well, just Love coins, period.
  • Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 4, 2019 5:07PM

    IMO, "orange peel" has a completely different appearance. Perhaps "rough satin" describes these surfaces better.

    PS I will concede that "orange peel" describes these coins better than when used to describe the surfaces of gold proofs!

  • RogerBRogerB Posts: 8,852 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Obviously this coins was made in the autumn and was struck through fresh apple butter.

    ;)

  • csdotcsdot Posts: 693 ✭✭✭✭

    Maybe the chocolate started melting under the foil? 😆

  • ReadyFireAimReadyFireAim Posts: 1,825 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 5, 2019 3:46AM

    And to make things even weirder, the obverse is usually more effected.
    Often the reverse of an "orange peel" coin is frosty or salty like my 16-s
    (the below is the reverse of the 1911-D above and an extreme example that has "orange peel" on both sides)

    So it's usually the hammer die or the top of the planchet???

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It has the appearance of rusty dies that were cleaned but not fully buffed...JMO... Cheers, RickO

  • ashelandasheland Posts: 23,177 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Pretty coins, not sure about the surface, almost seems like the surface of a matte proof... Maybe similarly made?

  • ReadyFireAimReadyFireAim Posts: 1,825 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 5, 2019 2:00PM

    @asheland said:
    ... almost seems like the surface of a matte proof... Maybe similarly made?

    It just so happens there is one for sale now.
    I've been visiting it every so often :p:p;)

    http://www.collectorscorner.com/Products/Item.aspx?id=43601157

  • EbeneezerEbeneezer Posts: 300 ✭✭✭

    My theory lies towards the die surface themselves. Sort of like the rusted die strikes of some early 1800's coinage.

  • ashelandasheland Posts: 23,177 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ReadyFireAim said:

    @asheland said:
    ... almost seems like the surface of a matte proof... Maybe similarly made?

    It just so happens there is one for sale now.
    I've been visiting it every so often :p:p;)

    http://www.collectorscorner.com/Products/Item.aspx?id=43601157

    That's sweet!

  • ffcoinsffcoins Posts: 518 ✭✭✭

    What’s the indication for this?

    @Insider2 said:
    Several dates in the teens have a similar surface. There appears to be a chemical residue on yours also.

  • RogerBRogerB Posts: 8,852 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The coin in OP's post was not sandblasted and has nothing in common with any proof Saint-Gaudens coin.

  • ReadyFireAimReadyFireAim Posts: 1,825 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @RogerB said:
    The coin in OP's post was not sandblasted.

    Here is some interesting information on the above proof (if you didn't notice the link in the listing)

    1908 $20 Motto PR65 PCGS. JD-1. The curvature of the dies for Saint-Gaudens new double eagle design made it impossible >for the Mint to produce the brilliant finish proofs of earlier years, so an artistic sandblast finish was employed for the >annual proof offerings, beginning in 1908. Sandblasted surfaces exhibit numerous minute facets that reflect the light at >different angles, giving a coin an unusual sparkle. Unfortunately, contemporary collectors much preferred the old brilliant >proofs. A passage from the April 1909 issue of The Numismatist summarized their feelings: {blockquote}"The types of the >gold coins now being issued at the United States Mint do not permit the making of bright finish or brilliant Proof >specimens. The face of the die touches almost every part of the planchet, dulling the surface of even a polished blank. >Proof coins of the present gold series, so far as issued, have a very dull appearance, the finish being what is known as >"sandblast," and are far less pleasing to the eye than the coinage for circulation, which is brighter and of lighter color.">{/blockquote} Correspondence between Mint Director A. Piatt Andrew and William Woodin indicates that 101 proof Saint->Gaudens double eagles were sold in 1908, far fewer than the 500 pieces produced. The unsold remainder must have been >melted after the end of the year. The double eagles were struck earlier, but proof sets were not delivered until December >30, waiting on the new Pratt designed quarter eagles and half eagles, which were only approved late in the year. The long >delay undoubtedly added to the confusion and frustration of prospective buyers. Roger W. Burdette estimates no more >than 60 proof 1908 Saint-Gaudens double eagles survive today in all grades. The coins began appearing at auction at an >early date. Lot 713 of the XLVII Public Auction Sale (Ben G. Green, 4/1909), contained a complete four-piece 1908 gold proof >set that sold for $76, a strong price for the time, perhaps ...

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file