trade rumors are heatin up..big dog for sprewell? stro for mike miller? fortson in philly? 2 picks f

ejones06 · June 22, 2002 5:31AM

nbaologist · June 22, 2002 5:33AM

Iverson for bibby

icon4400 · June 22, 2002 5:35AM

honestly whos going to trade a great player like bibby for a ball hog named iverson
that would be the dumbest trade in the history of the L
van horn to milwaukee for darvin ham

hitechkoolaid · June 22, 2002 5:36AM

B.D. isn't going anywhere until the end of next season. If anyone would have been able to trade for B.D. it would have been Chicago with #2 so the Hornets could get Jay Williams as a replacement.

nbaologist · June 22, 2002 5:37AM

I know philly rather have a team player bibby than a ballhogging maniac iverson is my point.

Nash · June 22, 2002 5:39AM

ejones...you wouldnt happen to be up on the baseball rumors would you???

ejones06 · June 22, 2002 5:47AM

sorry nash..no bb rumors. the site i got to is a bkb rumor site thats not personally owned, they get their stories from the media so everything is pretty much true.

icon4400 · June 22, 2002 5:48AM

so thats why you want ivy gone
ok now but sacto wont do it
but i agree the 6ers need a pg that can dish

Undertaker · June 22, 2002 6:00AM

lakers should get fortson.. they shoulda gotten him 2 years ago.. when he was a free agent, but they definately need a boy like danny.. he'd fit in great

ejones06 · June 22, 2002 6:07AM

hehe undertaker..lakers had battie before in the lue for van exel trade. i think they waived him. lakers were stupid.

mattdogg · June 22, 2002 6:07AM

I dont think the Iverson for Bibby trade would work out anyway. Iverson probably makes a lot more money. I wouldn't want that to happen either.

Undertaker · June 22, 2002 6:10AM

battie sux.. fortson on the other hand is one of the best defensive forwards in the nba + an excellent rebounder. if you let him play 30 minutes a game he'll easily average 13-14 boards. He'd complete Shaq perfectly

icon4400 · June 22, 2002 6:15AM

fortson wont average 13-14 boards if shaq is beside him snatching off the glass to.
but maybe hed average 7-8

Undertaker · June 22, 2002 6:18AM

lol have you seen that guy play? samaki walker averages 7-8 boards, horace grant averaged 8 boards, I'm telling ya.. Fortson would average 13-14 boards EASILY, even with Shaq next to him, cauz he'd get more roomth because of the double teams shaq draws

icon4400 · June 22, 2002 6:19AM

yeah thats true but one thing we can agree on is if he ends up in la he gets a ring

Undertaker · June 22, 2002 6:21AM

lol yea that's a fact.. they'll get a ring w/o him as well.. but they sure can use a guy like him

icon4400 · June 22, 2002 6:22AM

yea phil jackson could take a group of 3rd graders to a championship

kinger793 · June 22, 2002 6:23AM

IVERSON FOR BIBBY WOULD BE A GREAT TRADE FOR SAC...IVERSON IS IN THE TOP 3 BEST PLAYERS IN THE LEAGUE!!

Undertaker · June 22, 2002 6:26AM

kinger: iverson for bibby would be a dumb-a$$ trade.. who's gonna carry the ball for sacramento when bibby's gone? who's gonna tell iverson to not take 30 shots a game anymore? who's gonna make him shoot OVER 40%? nah.. iverson is just a fast kid who gets a lot of shots cauz there's no one else who can shoot it..

kinger793 · June 22, 2002 6:38AM

I WANNA SEE IVERSON VS BIBBY IN A ONE-ON-ONE GAME....IVERSON WOULD KILL HIM...

Undertaker · June 22, 2002 6:41AM

I agree.. but as wel all know basketball is a TEAM sport and Iverson sux on a TEAM.. bibby on the other hand is great on a TEAM.. the last thing the Kings can use is a selfish kid like Iverson to mess up their team spirit.. (o my god, I can't believe I wanna make the Kings better lol)

T1Mac · June 22, 2002 6:53AM

MILLER WILL LEAVE OVER MY DEAD BODY....

ejones06 · June 22, 2002 6:59AM

t1mac...mille isnt the one that gets to chose to leave or not. the organization decides upon that. and that trade is still possible cuz magic wants a big man down low and they dont really need miller. magic still made it to the playoffs w/o miller and also, miller would be complaining about playing time cuz hill is gonna be back next yr.

ejones06 · June 22, 2002 7:07AM

oh yeah taker battie does suck and i dont like him a bit. he has no game.

and fortson is a exellent rebounder for a man his size. he's only 6-8. thats the height of ur tmac or ur avg. sf. he'd be a monster if he was 7 ft.

Undertaker · June 22, 2002 7:09AM

yea he is.. he's like charles barkley, but he doesn't score as much as barkley did

vittleboy · June 22, 2002 7:27AM

Why whould The Bucks Trade Glenn for a washed up player in sprewell. I guess it whould be good for big being in a big city like NYC but ugg Hell he will be a Knick

Derrick · June 22, 2002 7:28AM

Iverson in the top 3 my ACHING ass! He's maybe top 6-7 at max...but top 3? I don't think so. That's a good one...

AI3TheAnswer · June 22, 2002 7:43AM

<< <i>so thats why you want ivy gone
ok now but sacto wont do it
but i agree the 6ers need a pg that can dish >>

Lmao, 6ers have a PG who can dish,His name is eric Snow..AI is'nt a PG he's a 2 Guard (Or shooting guard ) for the basketball illiterate,which you seem to be...

How bout' this one Kobe for anyone who's not a choking stuck on himself egomaniac?...Actually I hear the Lakers are gonna offer him 54 million to stay 4 more years..I think he should cause w/out Shaq he'd be just another great player stuck on a team going no where..Face all trades aside as long as the Lakers have Shaq they're going to dominate for the next several years..

JErik20 · June 22, 2002 7:49AM

Yeah Derrick, your opinion should hold a lot of weight. You think that Kobe is the best player in the league, when he isn't even the best player on his own team. Let's look at some facts:

Lakers = 3 NBA Titles

Kobe = ZERO NBA Finals MVPs

You'd think that if he were the best player in the league, he would be able to wrestle at least one MVP trophy from his own teammate. So you give me a break

Erik

Undertaker · June 22, 2002 7:53AM

lol he has a point there derrick

Shaq IS #1!

nbaologist · June 22, 2002 9:24AM

undertaker- Would you be saying shaq is #1 when he would of lost to tim duncan if kobe wasn't around? Shaq was averaging 21 ppg vs duncan and without kobe taking over games. The lakers wouldn't of got passed the spurs. Kobe lead in crunch time and lead in points before the finals started just like every other year.

Kobe is then told to take less shots and let shaq pound a great center like todd macc- Kobe avg 19 shots per game in the finals and avg 26 ppg, shooting 50+%, 8 rebs, 5 assists. Give kobe 10 more shots and what would he average jerik? Kobe doesn't need to wrestle shaq for finals mvp- He's much more mature than that.

crunch time the lakers rely on kobe not shaq.

1. Kobe Bryant (Lakers) 44 8 4 2 0 21 10 24 20 3 60 100
2. Shaquille O'Neal (Lakers) 29 18 2 2 5 21 7 26 15 1 60 90
3. Robert Horry (Lakers) 21 10 3 2 0 10 7 4 1 1 60 89
4. Rick Fox (Lakers) 18 11 2 1 2 5 3 14 12 2 60 88
5. Derek Fisher (Lakers) 24 4 2 1 0 8 2 24 19 0 60 80
6. Jason Kidd (Nets) 39 6 9 2 2 35 13 14 11 1 36 68
7. Mike Bibby (Kings) 30 5 5 1 0 24 10 10 10 1 40 66
8. Kenyon Martin (Nets) 26 10 2 2 1 16 8 10 9 3 36 65
9. Doug Christie (Kings) 15 11 7 0 2 10 1 16 12 3 40 59
10. Lucious Harris (Nets) 16 9 1 0 0 5 3 10 9 1 36 58
11. Paul Pierce (Celtics) 36 9 2 2 0 18 6 28 23 3 28 57
12. Vlade Divac (Kings) 10 8 0 1 1 5 4 2 1 3 40 55
13. Hedo Turkoglu (Kings) 15 11 0 0 0 12 5 4 4 1 36 54
14. Chris Webber (Kings) 12 10 4 1 3 17 5 6 2 2 40 52
15. Bobby Jackson (Kings) 15 4 0 1 0 10 4 8 5 0 40 51

kinger793 · June 22, 2002 9:28AM

IVERSON WOULD KICK KOBES A$$ JUST LIKE REGGIE MILLER HAHA!!

nbaologist · June 22, 2002 9:29AM

kinger- seriously how old are you? You have to be under 16 for sure. Actually I know for a fact you are, because only 16 year olds say idiotic comments like that!

kinger793 · June 22, 2002 9:41AM

YOURE JUST MAD BECAUSE KOBE BRYANT IS NOT NEAR AS TOUGH AS YOU THINK HE IS...HE GOT KNOCKED OUT AND DIDN'T DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT..WHY DOES HE WEAR GIRLS SUNGLASSES TO THE PRESS CONFERNCE? HES A PU_$$Y

kinger793 · June 22, 2002 9:46AM

nbaologist..YOU MUST BE A BAD A$$ 17 YEAR OLD THEN?!

nbaologist · June 22, 2002 9:59AM

Do you want to know the diffrence between me and you? You make comments that aren't even true while I make comments that 100% true. Kobe got knocked out now? Ok man- If that comment makes you feel better about your life- then i'm all for it. It's pretty interesting that you have to start talking about something that has nothing to do with basketball. If you like fighting go watch boxing and collect the famous rapists cards.

kinger793 · June 22, 2002 10:01AM

IT HAS TO DO WITH BASKETBALL IF 2 DIFFERENT BASKETBALL PLAYERS ARE INVOLVED..AND ITS DURING A BASKETBALL GAME..I DO LIKE BOXING AND OTHER FIGHTING SPORTS

nbaologist · June 22, 2002 10:11AM

I bet you didn't even know jordan and reggie miller were in a fight before did you?

kinger793 · June 22, 2002 10:17AM

NO, BUT IM NOT A JORDAN FAN EITHER SO I DONT CARE...HOPE HE GOT HIS A$$ KICKED 2

ScoutDawg · June 22, 2002 10:19AM

so was Jordan and manute bol big deal

Nash · June 22, 2002 10:29AM

The opinion of NBAologist seems to be that without kobe, shaq doesnt win...BUT, Shaq can take on anyone. He is the most dominant center, if not palyer in the league. So, if Kobe was gone, doesnt that jsut mean shaq would get more ball and more points, with FIsher Horry and Fox Playing supporting roles?

Im not a basketball fan, so please dont jump on me if i am wrong. Its just how i see it.

JErik20 · June 22, 2002 11:36AM

Still waiting to hear your explanation of my last reply Derrick........

Erik

nbaologist · June 22, 2002 1:08PM

nash I never said shaq doesn't win. I said he wouldn't win a title without kobe. BIg diffrence. It goes vice versa buddy. Jordan never won without pippen and pippen never won without jordan. Jordan had his chances to win solo, but never did. Iverson can't win solo and never will and NOBODY will win solo period. It takes a team that knows each other very well to win a title not 1 good player.

icon4400 · June 22, 2002 2:57PM

i know after i put ivy as a pg i was wrong i meant to put 2 guard but it dont matter to me either way hes a ball hog
he should be running point anyways at his hieght but he cant drop dimes like he can chip paint so either position it dont mean a thing to me
but thanks for trying to correct me i appreciate the time you took to try and humiliate me

nbaologist · June 22, 2002 3:09PM

Iverson use to play pg, but choose to be 2 guard. A shooting guard should shot over 40% though.

Brown didn't put ivo as a 2 guard ivo put himself as a 2 guard which isn't working.

uwftke26 · June 22, 2002 8:58PM

Derrick is right about Iverson not being top three for sure.

1. Shaq
2. Kobe
3. Duncan
4. Pierce
5. Kidd
6. McGrady
7. Garnett
8. Nowitzki

Now MAYBE we can find a spot for Iverson...but not ahead of any of these guys.

kinger793 · June 23, 2002 12:49AM

MCGRADY IS A LOT BETTER THAN KIDD...SO THATS WRONG...

battier · June 23, 2002 1:52AM

AIGHT THIS IS CRAZY.....IVERSON IS THE BEST PG IN THE LEAGUE AND HE DONT NEED TO PAST THE BALL.WHY?BECAUSE HE HAS NO ONE TO PAST IT TO.......I WOULDNT TRADE IVERSON FOR BIBBY ...CAUSE BIBBY BELONGS IN SAC...THEY HAVE CHEMISTRY THERE....... FORGET ALL THESE B.S. TRADE RUMORS WHAT THESE TEAMS NEED TO DO IS FIGURE OUT WHAT/WHO...ITS GONNA TAKE TO BEAT THE LAKERS.....BECAUSE YOU CAN MAKE ALL THE TRADES YOU WANT...IF YOU DONT HAVE THAT KINDA OF A GAME PLAN IT IS USELESS.....NOW BARON DAVIS GOING TO THE CLIPPERS WOULD BE A GOOD TRADE AND WHILE YA AT IT THROW MICHAEL OLOWACANDYCANE IN THE WEIGHTROOM........... AND THE CLIPPERS WILL HAVE A BETTER CHANCE AT THE LAKERS THAN THE NETS.........AND WATCH OUT FOR THEM WIZARDS.........THEY NEED TO TRADE ABOUT 4 PLAYERS AND GET SOME MORE POWER IN THE PAINT TO HELP JAHADI WHITE.......WHITE IS A FORCE TO BE WRECKING WITH HE IS JUST STARTING TO LEARN TO SCORE ...PLUS HE IS THE ONLY GUY IN THE LEAGUE THAT CAN GO BODY TO BODY WITH SHAQ....THE ONLY GUY..........

tuneman · June 23, 2002 2:10AM

whoever made that comment about jordan not winning without Pippen was just insaine-the guy was almost in a wheel chair when he went without Pippen>If you thought players couldnt make guys around them better look at MJ and Pippen> Pippen was voted one of the TOP 50 PLAYERS IN THE LEAGUE HISTORY for Christ sake withour MJ hed be another average starter on a bad team !!!

Also Fortson is the REAL DEAL. I live in San Francisco so i see him play. Hes the only guy on the team who can play. The guy is a monster on the boards. There hasnt been anyone like him since Rodman-He 'bounds like Rodman without the dress & hair. He would get 14 with Shaq-He averaged 19 the first week of the season before he got hurt. The problem is...Who would the Warriors trade for him. I mean they need help everywhere but the Lakers have nobody of any value to offer-except possibly a draft pick which they might not want cause its so late in the first round and youd have to guarantee the guy 3 years of $$$$

Undertaker · June 23, 2002 2:56AM

I don't know what they can offer for him.. maybe Samaki Walker who had some sort of breakout season.. or Devean George if he resigns (some sort of sign and trade deal) or maybe even for lindsey hunter, ya never know..

THEY NEED TO TRADE ABOUT 4 PLAYERS AND GET SOME MORE POWER IN THE PAINT TO HELP JAHADI WHITE.......WHITE IS A FORCE TO BE WRECKING WITH HE IS JUST STARTING TO LEARN TO SCORE ...PLUS HE IS THE ONLY GUY IN THE LEAGUE THAT CAN GO BODY TO BODY WITH SHAQ....THE ONLY GUY..........

sure.. Shaq weighs about 50 pounds more than White, and he's about 5 inches taller as well, no way White can go body to body with Shaq

zimmy3 · June 23, 2002 3:05AM

I dont know if the Bucks would want to deal with Sprewell. I think the only headache wed take on is Payton. Although Sprewell may want to return here cause this is where he grew up and went to HS, but I wouldnt want this guy here. His salary is through the roof and he is a headache

trade rumors are heatin up..big dog for sprewell? stro for mike miller? fortson in philly? 2 picks f

Comments