I'm not sure what the question is either. Are you asking how many individual graders within a TPG are "average" graders... meaning they get things mostly right with a few outliers here and there?
Collecting: Dansco 7070; Middle Date Large Cents (VF-AU); Box of 20;
I think he means that if you see a nice coins in a second tier slab, how much do you discount your offer for the coin compared to if the same coin was in a top tier slab at the same grade.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
@ChrisH821 said:
Zero. I don't care who graded it, everyone hits and misses, there's the eye appeal factor, etc. Not all coins of the same grade and TPGS are EQUAL.
"Equal" except for many things. The most important over a large number of coins is their perceived value once slabbed and our host wins that test most of the time.
I agree. As for me if I buy a nice coin in another holder I discount it by the amount it costs to get into a PCGS holder....same as I do with raw coins!
@PerryHall said:
I think he means that if you see a nice coins in a second tier slab, how much do you discount your offer for the coin compared to if the same coin was in a top tier slab at the same grade.
I will also say I hate ICG and ANACS holders because they don't like to be around NGC or PCGS holders and vica versa. Grab a handful of slabs outta the box and they cause them to go flying and don't stack together well either.
Once I though ICG had the ugliest slab - only a notch above the uglier ANACS holder. After a while, even those dumb finger indents didn't bother me as much. Then when they changed that horrible green label...
I'm biased. I think the Hallmark slab with the "banknote border" or the Compugrade slab are the most attractive.
Of course it comes down to "the coin"... but I find more coins appropriately graded in PCGS & NGC holders than others. That said... I've picked up a number of deals in ANACS and ICG holders over the years ;-)
Collecting: Dansco 7070; Middle Date Large Cents (VF-AU); Box of 20;
@Insider2 said:
Once I though ICG had the ugliest slab - only a notch above the uglier ANACS holder. After a while, even those dumb finger indents didn't bother me as much. Then when they changed that horrible green label...
I'm biased. I think the Hallmark slab with the "banknote border" or the Compugrade slab are the most attractive.
ICG has a very nice holder IMO. I've seen some of the old green ones with a black insert holding the coin, was this an option at some point?
The only holder I really don't like is the ANACS yellow one
@PerryHall said:
I think he means that if you see a nice coins in a second tier slab, how much do you discount your offer for the coin compared to if the same coin was in a top tier slab at the same grade.
If your interpretation is accurate, you deserve a Nobel Prize. I thought he was asking what our thoughts were of professional coin graders in general.
@PerryHall said:
I think he means that if you see a nice coins in a second tier slab, how much do you discount your offer for the coin compared to if the same coin was in a top tier slab at the same grade.
If your interpretation is accurate, you deserve a Nobel Prize. I thought he was asking what our thoughts were of professional coin graders in general.
Comments
.
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
???? I guess that is not as self explanatory as you thought... perhaps to you though. Cheers, RickO
Say again?
WHAT,WHAT.
As in TPGs?
Are we to assume that we’re not actually going to look at the coins?
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
Including the top 1% ?
I don't golf, and I don't know how to rate other golfers. Or were you talking about something else?
42
76 + 16 in a pinch and 31 retired. STUPID, STUPID, STUPID!
I'm not sure what the question is either. Are you asking how many individual graders within a TPG are "average" graders... meaning they get things mostly right with a few outliers here and there?
Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
I am usually able to figure out an unintelligible post but this one has me baffled. can someone, maybe the OP, please explain??
I think he means that if you see a nice coins in a second tier slab, how much do you discount your offer for the coin compared to if the same coin was in a top tier slab at the same grade.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
Ok....my answer is 2
Correct. I have the number a 1.
Zero. I don't care who graded it, everyone hits and misses, there's the eye appeal factor, etc. Not all coins of the same grade and TPGS are equal.
Collector, occasional seller
"Equal" except for many things. The most important over a large number of coins is their perceived value once slabbed and our host wins that test most of the time.
I agree. As for me if I buy a nice coin in another holder I discount it by the amount it costs to get into a PCGS holder....same as I do with raw coins!
I will also say I hate ICG and ANACS holders because they don't like to be around NGC or PCGS holders and vica versa. Grab a handful of slabs outta the box and they cause them to go flying and don't stack together well either.
Once I though ICG had the ugliest slab - only a notch above the uglier ANACS holder. After a while, even those dumb finger indents didn't bother me as much. Then when they changed that horrible green label...
I'm biased. I think the Hallmark slab with the "banknote border" or the Compugrade slab are the most attractive.
I think a lot of guys that are very good at grading, BUT if I am going to buy, I have to like and that has little to do with grade. So zero.
Of course it comes down to "the coin"... but I find more coins appropriately graded in PCGS & NGC holders than others. That said... I've picked up a number of deals in ANACS and ICG holders over the years ;-)
Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
ICG has a very nice holder IMO. I've seen some of the old green ones with a black insert holding the coin, was this an option at some point?
The only holder I really don't like is the ANACS yellow one
Collector, occasional seller
Uhhhh...."42"
Ha, I thought it meant which graders give you good value without waiting for some kind of sale or bulk submission.
Always liked the ICG holders - they stack nicely.
Take a mulligan...
Not only did you miss the fairway, your tee shot is ob. Not even Gerry Mulligan can help in changing the tune.
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
If your interpretation is accurate, you deserve a Nobel Prize. I thought he was asking what our thoughts were of professional coin graders in general.
Tom
2 and a third
Well, par value means face value, so I suppose I would pay face value for anything graded by any reputable TPG, and not discount from that.
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars
ONE!
Their should be a Nobel prize for numismatics.