1886 O DMPL morgan in MS, graded far off from such. Opinions/ideas
So what do you guys think of this grade? This is graded at AU58. This is a DMPL. So keep that in mind when you see the scuffs all over it. I’ve seen 63’s and 64s with much worse marks than this coin. What is the deal with the 1886 O? NGC did the exact same thing to me with an 1886-O. it was not this one (nor a DMPL) but was in amazing condition. When you pull it up on their website you don’t see any marks on the coin whatsoever, yet they also gave me a 58 . Really starting to get to me with these grades. Especially when I spent thousands on this one DMPL plus 250 to grade it. Now it’s worth 300 piddly bucks in the holder.
Does anybody have any recommendations on how to get the “real” grade that it should be?
I see all these threads with people who are happy with their grades. I can’t say the same. Are Key Dates just that much different of grading standards or what? Please help as well as let me know what you think this coin should be graded at. I’ll try and post the other that was done at NGC so you can tell me what you think that should be.
Plus I have some really nice toned Roosies I want to get graded as well as 64 and older quarters, Morgan’s, Franklins, Kennedy’s (64 sms), standings, walkings and many many many others. All in MS lots of toned, and i don’t want to get screwed on my grades if I’m going to spend the same amount on grading fees over the next month or 2 as I would buying a brand new car.
Sorry for the rant.... what’s your opinions?