Home U.S. Coin Forum

Perfect Attribution Service

Aspie_RoccoAspie_Rocco Posts: 3,359 ✭✭✭✭✭

I got back a 20 coin order on the 1st, all coins submitted under attribution and reholder, all passed! Some nickels were 53 proof DDO, 56 proof DDO 38 qdo, 2004P DDO. Some of the halves (all bugs Bunny 401) were 53-S, 54, 55, 59, 61 fbl

I am very happy to see a flawless variety submission, a grand slam!








Comments

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Congratulations on your submission results...Some nice Franklins there... Cheers, RickO

  • HemisphericalHemispherical Posts: 9,370 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Congrats @Aspie_Rocco!

    Never had a perfect (what I thought I should get versus what I actually received) submission but came close.

    For some reason the ‘53 jumps out to me. I think it might be the color, rose-gold-like, which NOW reminds me of Mother’s Day. What day is it?!

    Whew! Glad I got some time this year to get something. ;)

  • Aspie_RoccoAspie_Rocco Posts: 3,359 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That 1953 proof Nickel is the nicest PR64 I have ever seen in my life!
    Thanks for the reminder, will go get Mother’s Day cards today.

  • georgiacop50georgiacop50 Posts: 2,909 ✭✭✭✭

    The bell lines on that 1961 are hammered!

  • keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 3, 2019 1:51PM

    I am very happy to see a flawless variety submission.

    this raises a curious question --- when you have a "flawed" submission is it because you made a mistake, PCGS made a mistake or you and them just don't agree??

  • Aspie_RoccoAspie_Rocco Posts: 3,359 ✭✭✭✭✭

    A flawed order would be coins not properly attributed. At least 7 of these were on their 2nd-3rd trip for attribution.
    I stopped sending possible varieties a few years ago, anything I have submitted since 2017 has been pre examined under a microscope to make 100% positive identifications of die markers/ diagnostics and the variety itself.

    To be fair all of the resubmitted coins were rather uncommon die varieties, or newer CPG listings

    @keets said:
    I am very happy to see a flawless variety submission.

    this raises a curious question --- when you have a "flawed" submission is it because you made a mistake, PCGS made a mistake or you and them just don't agree??

    There was literally nothing to complain about on this order, as the customer experience has steadily improved to the point of a perfect order. Handling time was appropriate and within projections, shipping was lightning fast, holders and coin orientation all flawlessly done, and the attribution team has earned the “AR” gold bean ;)

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file