Which card in PSA 10 grade has more investment potential?
MLBdays
Posts: 1,359 ✭✭✭✭✭
PSA 10 pop. 46
PSA 10 pop. 13
Which card in PSA 10 grade has more investment potential?
This is a public poll: others will see what you voted for.
0
Comments
Stupid thumb. Meant to click Clemens. Lol
I'd go Clemens
I just can't help but laugh every time I see that Bonds card.
Clemens. the Bonds has the disadvantage of not picturing the correct player. try as I might, I always think of that card as a Johnny Ray card not a bonds.
George Brett, Roger Clemens and Tommy Brady.
The fact that the Barry Bonds is not really him makes for an interesting card, but I have to give it to Clemens.
Kris
My 1971 Topps adventure - Davis Men in Black
I'm not sure either one of these cards have any considerable upward potential for investment or speculation. Both product is readily available in unopened boxes and packs. I think typically sluggers HOF cards do better in the long run than pitchers. Sort of a toss up.
To be honest, no direction, but...
1966-69 Topps EX+
1975 minis NrMt Kelloggs PSA 9
All Topps Heritage-Master Sets
There have only been two sales of sealed 85T Tiffany sets in eBay completed (past 3 months?), none currently available. 87D Opening Day may have many more available, but odds of one containing the Johnny Ray error are minuscule. Not to mention actually getting a 10.
The Bonds card is really valuable, but come on. I mean look at it. Are you kidding me? If I have a Barry Bonds card, It would be nice if it was actually him on the card. It's like something from Saturday Night Live.
Right wrong or indifferent Bonds record will still stand out long after nobody cares about the steroid era anymore, Clemens doesn’t have anything like an all time HR record in his portfolio
To me they are both 2nd year cards. I believe the 86 traded and 84 updates are the only true rookies so I went for the Bonds because I believe less will continue to exist.