I pulled the trigger on a Huguenot.
I have always liked this design and as of late I've been enamored with the Dutch settling of New York and the area/history around Albany. I think I could live there, so it is right for me to be a little jealous of RickO. I visited there all to briefly during the summer of 2018 with my GF and found the City to be quaint, very architecturally artistic, cosmopolitan and yet only minutes from rural beauty.
U.S. coinage and medallic tribute to the area and the Dutch settlers is quite prolific. I have several medals but this is the first strictly coin related item I have bought. I tend to move slowly with a new purchase and looked at this one for a few weeks. My only concern is that it may be a little darker than these seller pictures show. The seller is a well known dealer so I'm not worried, I expect it will be close. The surfaces look clean and free of anything distracting and I suppose the tone is from a long while in an album of some type. The reverse especially shows a hint of nice color at the rim around 3 o'clock.
Tell me what you think about the coin, about the Dutch settlers, about Albany and about the prospect of living not to far from RickO!! Sleep easy, my friend, I'm not about to move any time soon.
Al H.
Comments
Overall, it looks like a nice coin with an original appearance. The light speckling is a minor distraction (to me), but on the other hand, the luster and flash look to be considerably above average for a Huguenot.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
Definitely original. Looks like there could be a lot of luster under the tone. A little crusty for me personally, though.
I like crust, especially on pizza and pies.........................and coins if it ain't too heavy. I'm anxious to hold this bugger in my hands.
I glanced at that, but couldn't get any sort of feeling what it would look like in hand from DLRC's cartoon like photography.
the in-holder pictures look flooded but this cropped one looks OK. I bought from them a number of years ago, maybe 12-15 and it was alright. we shall see, in about 4-5 days. I'll try to post some of my own pictures.
Very nice example, Al. The toning fits. Not like the toning usually found on these and the Long Island.
Nice grab!
Cheers
Bob
thanks Bob, the Long Island is sort of similar and I think you're right about how the two usually look. someone like Frank above would be better informed on that, but don't they most often look creamy-white RickO approved?? I have another one saved in My eBay that's in an old no-line fatty but it looks to have toned a bit too dark and if the supposition about those holders is correct it may continue to get darker.
does anyone else have a toned Huguenot to post??
I am from Albany, NY born and raised there.
Cool coin and the right time to buy.
Theme? History and coins with ships on them.
Very nice coin.
Good acquisition Al.... More tarnish than I would prefer....However, the strike is great and it is for your collection. As to moving here... You would be welcome, although it is mainly a coin desert....We would spend a lot of time looking at each others collections... ... Look forward to your pictures...Cheers, RickO
A nice example.
You would be welcome, although it is mainly a coin desert....We would spend a lot of time looking at each others collections...
where's that laughing icon when I need it!!
Since most of the US commemoratives like this were made only a couple generations ago, and represent some great aspects of US history, it would be good to hear from old timers on their impressions on coins like this. The Huegenots were fleeing religious persecution apparently. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huguenots George Morgan designed the coin. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huguenot-Walloon_half_dollar Nice coin.
I like it! Crust is good!
Here's LI typical crust...
Here's my toned example. Im in love with it. Got it off ebay right after it was listed. Got a good deal and a real nice coin.
PCGS MS66
@keets,
Nice coin. I like the look.
Most of these are monochromatic, light gold, light grey or light blue or untoned.
Album toned is about the best you will find with this issue, and there are only a few monster coins out there
Heres one that I picked up and paid no premium for color
Commems and Early Type
The commems are really underappreciated. I mean, some of them have uninspired designs (BTW, I'm looking at you). But some of them are really nicely done, like the Huguenot coin, Pan-Pac, San Diego, etc.
It is really interesting to me that these are so unpopular. I mean some of them - 2 million+ Columbians - are common. But look at some of the mintages of what are CHEAP ($100-ish in UNC) coins:
Maine 50,028
Maryland 25,015
Rhode Island 50,034
Robinson-Arkansas 25,265
Cleveland 50,030
Even some of the multi-year issues have relatively low total mintages with $100 examples available of the more common years:
San Diego 100,224 (both years combined)
Boone 87,187 (all years combined)
Arkansas 85,302 (all years combined)
By themselves, I'd say "so what", but people do line up to pay $55 for modern silver dollar commemoratives that have mintages of 100,000+. Are there really not enough of those people willing to pony up for a Maryland? TWENTY FIVE THOUSAND TOTAL MINTAGE!
jm, I think you highlight a disconnection with some in the Hobby that on the surface doesn't make sense. in part it's because Commem's are intended as a non-circulating coin so some snub them for that reason and it seems to take newcomers a while to "discover" the series because of the NCLT issue. i only own a handful but I find myself always looking at them.
SC$'s and Commem's have one thing in common that's a draw for me, the many varied designs.
I like it! I like the issue and the toning on this particular piece. I grew up a bit further north in Oswego... Albany was the big city.
Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
I think the NCLT point is a good one. Maybe we need a marketing campaign aimed at that group. LOL.
I wonder if the U.S. Mint might not help out if they were to start issuing modern commems linked to the classics. We are just getting to the century mark for a lot of them - missed Pan-Pac, LOL - but if they did a 2020 Maine bicentennial coin in 100,000 mintage for example, it could really drive interest in the 1920 Maine centennial coin. You've got a lot of issues in the 1920s whose centennial is coming up.
On the moneclip thread, there's a whole lot of hand-wringing about the loss of the High Relief Saint - mintage 13,000. I wonder if those people would be at all upset with a money clip made out of a Hudson or Spanish Trail commem - mintage only 10,000.
TEN THOUSAND - FOLKS!!!
I tend to like the Boone's and some of the individual date/MM combinations are quite low, under 5,000. it's interesting that no one complains about these low mintage coins but they will calmly explain why the 1994 SMS Jefferson Nickel isn't a worthy coin to be collected.
1939 P,D,S Oregon Trail are only 3,000 each.
1938 PDS Boone are only 2,100 each.
Not that you need collect by date/MM, but your point is valid about the scarcity of these.
It is one of the things that makes me wonder about how deep the pool of collectors actually is. I mean, of US collectors you're going to have X% that care about commems. Commem prices have dropped which means one of two things (since there's no new supply): either X is decreasing or the number of U.S. collectors is decreasing.
If you think about these relative to far more common coins struck for circulation and even adjusting for survivorship in UNC, it just might be that these are the canary in the coal mine. 10,000 Hudsons in existence and not enough demand to hold or push the price. For something like a 16-D dime where the TOTAL survivorship might be 10 or 15 times the mintage of the Hudson, X is much bigger and so the price drop in circ 16-D dimes is not as obvious...yet.
Pheww! I read the title of the thread and I thought you shot someone.
Bumping this thread up.
I recently purchased a Huguenot from @keets (easy no hassle transaction from the BST) and was hoping to see some other examples. Not a lot out there - this is one of the few threads - and it’s the coin I bought!
Here’s the OP coin TrueView and in hand appearance. It has much more luster than another I previously owned. Any feedback welcome.
But, any other Huguenot commems out there?
My current "Box of 20"
That's a nice piece!
Great transactions with oih82w8, JasonGaming, Moose1913.
My two cents on this zombie thread:
I used to collect classic silver commems (and the memorabilia) so I have some insights into this market.
Collecting the modern NCLT commems in someways are a no-brainer: you give your money to the Mint and you get a really nice MS68-69-70 collectible.
Now compare the buying experience of a classic commem over the last hundred years (lol). You had to find the right association that sold the commems (it wasn't the Mint) and the scarcity was often manipulated (I'm talking about you Boone, Oregon, BTW, WashCarv and more). Consider the quality standards of the Mint back then compared to cornucopia of today's proof gems. If you were to buy a classic commem today, only the bold (ie well-educated) and/or foolhardy would buy a classic commem uncertified. Even then, it's a given that many white classic commems have been given a market acceptable "treatment".
For a new collector, it seems like a no-brainer: you know what you're getting when you buy NCLT commemoratives from the Mint. Pricing is transparent (mostly) and the quality will be very high and definitely unaltered. Contrast the buying experience of a classic commem: the variables and variability is daunting: white and/or toned, what grade, which dealer(s) or venue(s), etc.
Very nice @keets! Glad you jumped in!
I love the history behind these and the area.
Nice specimens as well @CommemKing and @Bob13!
Mine can't hold a candle to yours but I still like it. Hopefully, one day I'll have a high grade, toned specimen too!
The Dutch have a big influence in the Albany area, and the Van Rensselaers were a big part of it. They had over 1 million acres, which is larger than the state of Rhode Island! Of note, Herman Melville and Edith Wharton were part of the extended family.
The following photos are from Wikipedia which is linked above.
This is where Kiliaen was born:
A portrait of Stephen:
And a photo of General Henry Bell:
Here's a map of the family's land which was over 1 million acres:
Wow, Stephen Van Rensselaer is the 22th richest person of all time according to the following article on CelebrityNetWorth.com:
The Richest Human Beings Of All Time – #22: Stephen van Rensselaer – Who Was He And How'd He Earn His Fortune?
Here’s mine:
My collecting “Pride & Joy” is my PCGS Registry Dansco 7070 Set:
https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/type-sets/design-type-sets/complete-dansco-7070-modified-type-set-1796-date/publishedset/213996
Thanks @winesteven and @Zoins for the additional examples! @winesteven I like the rim toning on there - I thought you were more of a bright white/ @ricko kind of guy!
Any more examples out there?
@Mitchell - I read your post with interest. But, I do enjoy the "classic" commems more than the new ones. In part because I like the older production techniques - look how deep the Vermont commem is! And, I like the toning conveyed by mailers or storage so that you can find some unique looking coins. The modern commems all look pretty much the same to me. Just no thrill of the hunt for me.
But hey, each series has some cool coins, and some dogs. I stopped trying to collect all from the series - just the ones that I like!
My current "Box of 20"
While as a generalization for my 20th Century silver I do indeed prefer the coins to look like they did when they first came off the press, just as the designer envisioned they would look, I’m also ok with slight toning. The key for me is to have my coins highly lustrous! So while I recognize my coins are very likely to have been dipped at some point in the past, apparently it was done gently enough that even CAC still applies their sticker to each of my coins, as a ton of luster is usually still present.
I recognize my taste is not that of most “knowledgeable” dealers and collectors, but there is a large but silent group of collectors like me! I know this, as there is voracious bidding I often encounter in auctions on mid to high grade coins with CAC’s that I like.
Steve
My collecting “Pride & Joy” is my PCGS Registry Dansco 7070 Set:
https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/type-sets/design-type-sets/complete-dansco-7070-modified-type-set-1796-date/publishedset/213996
Hi guys, this post is why I joined the forum. I recently acquired a Huguenot and wanted to share my find. I can honestly say though, that my pictures don't give the patina on this coin justice. How do you take pictures to show off the patina quality? And how do you embed photos... the photo link above the post box didn't seem to work.
https://ibb.co/gvv2h6j
https://ibb.co/MGDdYd5
Congratulations @robdb80 . Lovely example! Enjoy!
I believe you have to have been a member for a certain short period of time, and/or a certain number of “legitimate” posts to be able to post photos using the icon at the far right above the text box. I also gave you a “Like” if that helps get you approved to post photos.
Welcome!
My collecting “Pride & Joy” is my PCGS Registry Dansco 7070 Set:
https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/type-sets/design-type-sets/complete-dansco-7070-modified-type-set-1796-date/publishedset/213996
Welcome to the party!
As @winesteven said, you may need a few posts before you can directly post images. Once you have the posting icon, it's very straight forward.
For now, here are your images.
Nice coin!
Thanks guys, I can honestly say that I bought this because I had never seen anything like it and the price was way too good to pass up. The artwork on this makes me want to look for more commemoratives now.
Having completed my Dansco 7070 Registry Set, I started looking for a new interesting set. After doing some research, like you, I found the 50 Coin Classic Silver Commemorative Type Set filled with many gorgeous designs, and fascinating stories behind them! Many collectors bash this series due to price drops over the decades, but closer looks show that in general prices have stabilized a few years ago, and in some cases have started rising. But most of us don’t collect for the main reason of financial gain, but instead collect for the beauty of the coins and their interesting history!
robdb80, Go for it!
Here’s a hotlink to my digital Classic Commem Silver Type Set:
https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/u-s-coins/commemoratives/silver-commemoratives-50-piece-type-set-circulation-strikes-1892-1954/album/189058
Steve
My collecting “Pride & Joy” is my PCGS Registry Dansco 7070 Set:
https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/type-sets/design-type-sets/complete-dansco-7070-modified-type-set-1796-date/publishedset/213996
Man, what happened to the OP, Keets? Looks like he is banned. Another long term member jettisoned to the dark web
😔
Dead Cat Waltz Exonumia
"Coin collecting for outcasts..."
The price of Classic Commoratives has only slightly moved up in the last two years. I think this is where the PCGS Registry offering the 50 coin set (not giving credit for the better varieties) and then leaping to the 144 coin set isn't helping the collecting of Classic Commemoratives. Many collectors decide to go for the least expensive coin of each type.
For a collector thinking of spending $59,763 on a 144 coin set in MS 65 it is a little mind boggling. And that creates eight boxes of 20 with some rather inexpensive low mintage coins. Putting together a 50 coin type set for $29,283 seems a little more reasonable. And $19,298 in MS 64 is even more reasonable. However, once that set is completed and a ongoing interest is there, a 55 coin set including the Grant Star, Alabama Star, Missouri 2X2, double date Boone & Pilgrim coins, as suggested by David Hall in past years, would be a logical next step for the Registry. After that one could do a date set with every year represented. Suddenly, a 144 coin set doesn't seem to be so unreachable. So add two more categories to the Registry - a 55 coin & a date set.
The Sports Forum happened.
m
Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
I disagree on Booker T Washington. I've always found the reverse inspiring - "FROM SLAVE CABIN TO HALL OF FAME." While my early American ancestors weren't slaves, they lived in log cabins.
Smaller Registry Sets will help in multiple areas with different designs, like classic commems, patterns, So-Called Dollars, Civil War Tokens, and others.
If David @homerunhall suggested it, I wonder why it wasn't done.
Unfortunately, he only suggested it in his marketing materials to sell coins.
Here's one of mine.
Nice coin, excellent history of Rennselear and early NY. Thanks. Peace Roy
BST: endeavor1967, synchr, kliao, Outhaul, Donttellthewife, U1Chicago, ajaan, mCarney1173, SurfinHi, MWallace, Sandman70gt, mustanggt, Pittstate03, Lazybones, Walkerguy21D, coinandcurrency242 , thebigeng, Collectorcoins, JimTyler, USMarine6, Elkevvo, Coll3ctor, Yorkshireman, CUKevin, ranshdow, CoinHunter4, bennybravo, Centsearcher, braddick, Windycity, ZoidMeister, mirabela, JJM, RichURich, Bullsitter, jmski52, LukeMarshall, coinsarefun, MichaelDixon, NickPatton, ProfLiz, Twobitcollector,Jesbroken oih82w8, DCW