Home U.S. Coin Forum

Did Isaac Newton invent the perfect coin ?

1630Boston1630Boston Posts: 13,781 ✭✭✭✭✭


At this point, you probably have a good sense of Newton's obsessive nature. So it should come as no surprise to learn that, when appointed the largely ceremonial role of Warden at the Royal Mint in 1696, the famed inventor took to the mean streets of London -- in disguise -- to root out counterfeiters.
And since counterfeiting was then a capital offense in Britain, the miscreants he brought to justice typically wound up at the execution block.

See, by the late 1600s, England's financial system was in full-blown crisis mode. The country's currency consisted entirely of silver coins, and that silver was often worth more than the value stamped on it. So what did people do? Why, they melted down the coins or "clipped" silver from the edges to sell to France.

By Newton's time, clipping had done a number on the nation's currency. The average bag of English coins was just a hodgepodge of damaged and unrecognizable silver chunks. As such, forgers had a field day. Since English coins varied so widely in size and quality, it was easy to pass off even the most sloppy knockoffs as legal tender. Riots broke out as faith in the English currency plummeted.

So in 1696, the British government called on Newton. In addition to hands-on crime fighting, he recalled all English coins and had them melted down and remade into a higher-quality, harder-to-counterfeit design. It was a bold move, considering that the entire country had to make do without a currency for an entire year. Working as many as 18 hours a day, Newton reorganized the Royal Mints into high-quality, high-efficiency factories pumping out currency that was highly resistant to forgers.

You know those ridges on the edge of a U.S. quarter? Those are milled edges, a feature introduced by Newton on English coins to prevent clipping.

Successful transactions with : MICHAELDIXON, Manorcourtman, Bochiman, bolivarshagnasty, AUandAG, onlyroosies, chumley, Weiss, jdimmick, BAJJERFAN, gene1978, TJM965, Smittys, GRANDAM, JTHawaii, mainejoe, softparade, derryb

Bad transactions with : nobody to date

Comments

  • thisistheshowthisistheshow Posts: 9,386 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I did not know that.

  • 3keepSECRETif2rDEAD3keepSECRETif2rDEAD Posts: 4,285 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Whoa...that’s way too cool...I just burnt one down so I had to check the date and make sure it wasn’t April yet and then off to Google I went ;)

  • markelman1125markelman1125 Posts: 1,843 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited February 25, 2019 8:47PM

    Well the coin-press would have had a force of many Newton’s when creating the new coin.

    Cool history 👍

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @1630Boston ....Thanks for a great post.... Interesting bit of history... So, when there was no currency, did they simply barter for goods?? Cheers, RickO

  • 1630Boston1630Boston Posts: 13,781 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Section 6-----------The death penalty for mixing copper with silver !!!!

    Coin Act 1696
    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Jump to navigationJump to search
    The Coin Act 1696 (8&9 Will.3 c.26) was an Act of the Parliament of England which made it high treason to make or possess equipment useful for counterfeiting coins. Its title was "An Act for the better preventing the counterfeiting the current Coin of this Kingdom." It was extended to cover Scotland by the Treason Act 1708.

    Provisions
    The Act came into effect on 15 May 1697. Section 1 made it treason to "knowingly make or mend, or begin or proceed to make or mend, or assist in the making or mending of" any stamp, mould or the like which could be used to make gold or silver coins current in the realm, or any tool which could be used to emboss letters or marks on the side of a coin. It was also treason to knowingly buy, hide or conceal, or have possession of such items "without lawful Authority or sufficient Excuse for that Purpose." Aiding or abetting such conduct was also treason.

    Section 2 made it treason to "wittingly or knowingly convey or assist in the conveying" any of the items described in section 1 out of the Royal Mint without lawful authority. "Knowingly receiving, hiding or concealing the same" without lawful authority was also treason. This section differed from section 1 in that "sufficient Excuse" was not a defence.

    Section 3 made it treason to mark the edges of any coin, whether the coin was current or not, or even a counterfeit coin (except if done by a person working in the Royal Mint).

    Section 4 made it treason to colour or gild a coin, or anything resembling a coin, so as to make it resemble gold or silver.

    Section 5 provided for the destruction of coin-producing machinery found in the possession of anyone not an employee of the Royal Mint.

    **Section 6 made it a felony to take counterfeit money, or to mix copper with silver. The penalty for this offence was death.
    **
    Section 7 stated that corruption of blood was not to apply to any of the offences under this Act.

    Section 8 provided that trials under the act were to be conducted either in the Court of King's Bench or before the justices of oyer and terminer, the assizes, or the Court of General Gaol Delivery.

    Section 9 required any prosecution for offences under the Act to begin within 3 months of the offence. This time limit was later amended to 6 months for offences under sections 1 and 3 (by 1 Anne c.9 (1701/2) and by 7 Anne c.25 (1708)).

    The Act was originally a temporary one which was due to expire, but it was made perpetual by 1 Anne c.9.

    Successful transactions with : MICHAELDIXON, Manorcourtman, Bochiman, bolivarshagnasty, AUandAG, onlyroosies, chumley, Weiss, jdimmick, BAJJERFAN, gene1978, TJM965, Smittys, GRANDAM, JTHawaii, mainejoe, softparade, derryb

    Bad transactions with : nobody to date

  • HemisphericalHemispherical Posts: 9,370 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Thanks for the very informative numismatic history lesson @1630Boston.

  • ashelandasheland Posts: 23,177 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Great thread! This is closely connected to the hallmarking of British silver, something I collect and love to study!

  • ashelandasheland Posts: 23,177 ✭✭✭✭✭

    London, 1787 hallmarks:
    the same standard as the coin of the time, sterling

  • MeltdownMeltdown Posts: 8,776 ✭✭✭✭✭
  • johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 28,282 ✭✭✭✭✭

    the value of an education with things being related to this (& other things) = priceless

  • 1630Boston1630Boston Posts: 13,781 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Successful transactions with : MICHAELDIXON, Manorcourtman, Bochiman, bolivarshagnasty, AUandAG, onlyroosies, chumley, Weiss, jdimmick, BAJJERFAN, gene1978, TJM965, Smittys, GRANDAM, JTHawaii, mainejoe, softparade, derryb

    Bad transactions with : nobody to date

  • lkeneficlkenefic Posts: 8,160 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Thanks for sharing. I absolutely love the history attached to some of these pieces.

    Collecting: Dansco 7070; Middle Date Large Cents (VF-AU); Box of 20;

    Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
  • Namvet69Namvet69 Posts: 8,951 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I wonder if anybody has Newtons fingerprint on a coin? Or did he wear gloves? Isaac was a smart fella! Peace Roy

    BST: endeavor1967, synchr, kliao, Outhaul, Donttellthewife, U1Chicago, ajaan, mCarney1173, SurfinHi, MWallace, Sandman70gt, mustanggt, Pittstate03, Lazybones, Walkerguy21D, coinandcurrency242 , thebigeng, Collectorcoins, JimTyler, USMarine6, Elkevvo, Coll3ctor, Yorkshireman, CUKevin, ranshdow, CoinHunter4, bennybravo, Centsearcher, braddick, Windycity, ZoidMeister, mirabela, JJM, RichURich, Bullsitter, jmski52, LukeMarshall, coinsarefun, MichaelDixon, NickPatton, ProfLiz, Twobitcollector,Jesbroken oih82w8

  • jgennjgenn Posts: 742 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited February 26, 2019 10:10PM

    Milled coinage started in 1662, or 1657 if you include Blondeau's issues for Cromwell. That, with the lettered edges to curtail clipping greatly increased the difficulty of making counterfeits, however the desired effect on forgers and clippers was limited until hammered coins were demonetized. So, important measures were in place well before Newton's tenure.

  • KudbegudKudbegud Posts: 4,735 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Very interesting stuff I didn't know. Now I do. Thanks.


  • ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,113 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @1630Boston said:
    So in 1696, the British government called on Newton. In addition to hands-on crime fighting, he recalled all English coins and had them melted down and remade into a higher-quality, harder-to-counterfeit design. It was a bold move, considering that the entire country had to make do without a currency for an entire year. Working as many as 18 hours a day, Newton reorganized the Royal Mints into high-quality, high-efficiency factories pumping out currency that was highly resistant to forgers.

    Reminds me of what India did recently:

    Why India wiped out 86% of its cash overnight

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-37974423

    Unfortunately, it didn't seem to work:

    India's banknote recall failed to uncover 'black money'

    https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/08/india-bank-note-ban-failed-slowed-economy-central-bank-180830093047724.html

  • savitalesavitale Posts: 1,409 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Thanks for the informative post. I did not know Isaac Newton invented the reeded edge. Very interesting.

    There were of course much earlier Roman coins with serrated edges, but it seems the jury is still out on the purpose.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file