Home U.S. Coin Forum

Vintage Crackle AT Toning Resurfaces Images enclosed for Younger Collectors & Younger TPGS Graders.

BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited February 10, 2019 8:44AM in U.S. Coin Forum

This artificial toning method was popular about 20 years ago and you would see it very often on low value coins which could go for stupid money with a color premium such as common date Morgan & Peace $1's. On Early Commems it was mostly seen on issues that sold for around $100 or less in UNC along with far more seen on Booker T. Washington and Washington Carvers. 15-20 years ago some would make it into NGC holder along with other TPGS's like PCI and SEGS which come to mind. In the last couple years I've seen them make it into PCGS holder as they started popping up on Coinfacts. Having just seen another this morning it was time to make the younger folks that haven't been in this hobby for a few decades aware.



To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!

Comments

  • CameonutCameonut Posts: 7,390 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I've seen a few of these from time to time.
    Anyone have any idea how this was done?

    “In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." - Thomas Jefferson

    My digital cameo album 1950-64 Cameos - take a look!

  • BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited February 10, 2019 6:55AM

    @Cameonut said:
    I've seen a few of these from time to time.
    Anyone have any idea how this was done?

    I recall a dealer at a show stating that the coins had been coated with some sort of high sulfur content jelly (maybe Vaseline?) with a thin piece of cellophane from like a pack of cigarettes pushed onto both sides. Apparently not a heat or cooking method as cellophane kept the jelly from drying out until it did its job then the coins just got rinsed off and submitted.

    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited February 10, 2019 7:10AM

    @Cameonut said:
    I've seen a few of these from time to time.
    Anyone have any idea how this was done?

    I've also seen it on 1940's Mercury and Roosevelt Dimes, 1950-60's Washington Quarters, Franklin, and 1964 Kennedy Halves.

    It's easier to instantly spot on larger diameter coins... Might take a few seconds more on a Dime ;)

    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited February 10, 2019 7:19AM

    @Insider2 said:
    From what I've seen over the years, the vintage commemorative half dollars were the main target.

    I agree and the busier the design elements the more crackled, as seen on the Texas commem which was a another major culprit.

    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ricko said:
    I never understood the attraction for this type of tarnish....Just looks dirty to me.... @Broadstruck ... Thanks for the educational post...Cheers, RickO

    Greed by taking advantage of naive color enthusiasts.

    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • bronco2078bronco2078 Posts: 10,425 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I think we can all agree that paying extra for randomly colorful coins is the real problem. A fool and their money have an existential need to be parted. If its not splotches of color its condition rarity or shiny stickers

  • CameonutCameonut Posts: 7,390 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Insider2 said:
    From what I've seen over the years, the vintage commemorative half dollars were the main target.

    Years ago, I actually had a few commems with this type of toning. All sold several years ago. Most were in old green holders if I recall correctly.

    “In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." - Thomas Jefferson

    My digital cameo album 1950-64 Cameos - take a look!

  • batumibatumi Posts: 887 ✭✭✭✭

    @Cameonut said:
    I've seen a few of these from time to time.
    Anyone have any idea how this was done?

    Cameonut: One more questio. Will this 'toning' come off? I find it hideous.

  • Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited February 10, 2019 8:17AM

    @Broadstruck said:

    @ricko said:
    I never understood the attraction for this type of tarnish....Just looks dirty to me.... @Broadstruck ... Thanks for the educational post...Cheers, RickO

    Greed by taking advantage of naive color enthusiasts.

    Remember, this toning fooled EVERYONE at first. I believe this was the first type of artificial toning that I ever became aware of. I don't know who the first person was who condemned it.

    PS I see the folks who wish to tell all of us what to appreciate and collect are awake and posting today.

  • bronco2078bronco2078 Posts: 10,425 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Insider2 said:

    @Broadstruck said:

    @ricko said:
    I never understood the attraction for this type of tarnish....Just looks dirty to me.... @Broadstruck ... Thanks for the educational post...Cheers, RickO

    Greed by taking advantage of naive color enthusiasts.

    Remember, this toning fooled EVERYONE at first. I believe this was the first type of artificial toning that I ever became aware of. I don't know who the first person was who condemned it.

    It only fooled those that have not reached the proper stage of enlightenment . Those of us residing on that higher plane wouldn't pay any extra B).

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 15,142 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @bronco2078 said:

    @Insider2 said:

    @Broadstruck said:

    @ricko said:
    I never understood the attraction for this type of tarnish....Just looks dirty to me.... @Broadstruck ... Thanks for the educational post...Cheers, RickO

    Greed by taking advantage of naive color enthusiasts.

    Remember, this toning fooled EVERYONE at first. I believe this was the first type of artificial toning that I ever became aware of. I don't know who the first person was who condemned it.

    It only fooled those that have not reached the proper stage of enlightenment . Those of us residing on that higher plane wouldn't pay any extra B).

    It fooled the top grading companies. And even if it hadn’t, that wouldn’t necessarily make buyers of the coins “naive” or “fools”.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • bronco2078bronco2078 Posts: 10,425 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:

    @bronco2078 said:

    @Insider2 said:

    @Broadstruck said:

    @ricko said:
    I never understood the attraction for this type of tarnish....Just looks dirty to me.... @Broadstruck ... Thanks for the educational post...Cheers, RickO

    Greed by taking advantage of naive color enthusiasts.

    Remember, this toning fooled EVERYONE at first. I believe this was the first type of artificial toning that I ever became aware of. I don't know who the first person was who condemned it.

    It only fooled those that have not reached the proper stage of enlightenment . Those of us residing on that higher plane wouldn't pay any extra B).

    It fooled the top grading companies. And even if it hadn’t, that wouldn’t necessarily make buyers of the coins “naive” or “fools”.

    But its ugly !!! so what were the buyers even thinking? If they weren't thinking crack that mess and dip it then they are too far gone to help here

  • 1TwoBits1TwoBits Posts: 464 ✭✭✭✭

    Interesting post, Broadstruck. I've seen coins fitting that toning pattern from time to time, but luckily not in the series I mainly collect. Thanks for the information.

    1TwoBits

    Searching for bust quarters.....counterstamps, errors, and AU-MS varieties, please let me know if you can help.
  • Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Enlightenment is one thing. Selling a beautifully corroded coin for 10X the money it would be worth as the brilliant original one that is preferred by the "enlightened" crowd is another. While I don't force my tastes on others (something I find that most Liberals and ignorant do-gooders are guilty of) I enjoy learning what others like. o:)

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 15,142 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @bronco2078 said:

    @MFeld said:

    @bronco2078 said:

    @Insider2 said:

    @Broadstruck said:

    @ricko said:
    I never understood the attraction for this type of tarnish....Just looks dirty to me.... @Broadstruck ... Thanks for the educational post...Cheers, RickO

    Greed by taking advantage of naive color enthusiasts.

    Remember, this toning fooled EVERYONE at first. I believe this was the first type of artificial toning that I ever became aware of. I don't know who the first person was who condemned it.

    It only fooled those that have not reached the proper stage of enlightenment . Those of us residing on that higher plane wouldn't pay any extra B).

    It fooled the top grading companies. And even if it hadn’t, that wouldn’t necessarily make buyers of the coins “naive” or “fools”.

    But its ugly !!! so what were the buyers even thinking? If they weren't thinking crack that mess and dip it then they are too far gone to help here

    Many years ago, I saw numerous other examples that were attractive, not ugly. Regardless, your reply ignored the fact that top grading companies were fooled by some of the coins.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • bronco2078bronco2078 Posts: 10,425 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:

    @bronco2078 said:

    @MFeld said:

    @bronco2078 said:

    @Insider2 said:

    @Broadstruck said:

    @ricko said:
    I never understood the attraction for this type of tarnish....Just looks dirty to me.... @Broadstruck ... Thanks for the educational post...Cheers, RickO

    Greed by taking advantage of naive color enthusiasts.

    Remember, this toning fooled EVERYONE at first. I believe this was the first type of artificial toning that I ever became aware of. I don't know who the first person was who condemned it.

    It only fooled those that have not reached the proper stage of enlightenment . Those of us residing on that higher plane wouldn't pay any extra B).

    It fooled the top grading companies. And even if it hadn’t, that wouldn’t necessarily make buyers of the coins “naive” or “fools”.

    But its ugly !!! so what were the buyers even thinking? If they weren't thinking crack that mess and dip it then they are too far gone to help here

    Many years ago, I saw numerous other examples that were attractive, not ugly. Regardless, your reply ignored the fact that top grading companies were fooled by some of the coins.

    True but maybe it indicates that the TPG's don't care all that much its a real coin and if they turned away ugly coins or coins that should not be submitted for other reasons there goes 90% of the revenue :D

  • chesterbchesterb Posts: 968 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Thanks for the post. It helps train my eye towards what to look out for and is a good reminder for everyone.

  • CommemDudeCommemDude Posts: 2,357 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I have seen Gettysburgs, BTWs, and many other commems with this toning....often it is green-red-gold and can have a very attractive look until you realize it is AT. I think it was an attempt to replicate the feathery grey-blue toning one sees on silver that has been stored in a paper envelope for a long time.

    Dr Mikey
    Commems and Early Type
  • bronco2078bronco2078 Posts: 10,425 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:

    @bronco2078 said:

    @MFeld said:

    @bronco2078 said:

    @Insider2 said:

    @Broadstruck said:

    @ricko said:
    I never understood the attraction for this type of tarnish....Just looks dirty to me.... @Broadstruck ... Thanks for the educational post...Cheers, RickO

    Greed by taking advantage of naive color enthusiasts.

    Remember, this toning fooled EVERYONE at first. I believe this was the first type of artificial toning that I ever became aware of. I don't know who the first person was who condemned it.

    It only fooled those that have not reached the proper stage of enlightenment . Those of us residing on that higher plane wouldn't pay any extra B).

    It fooled the top grading companies. And even if it hadn’t, that wouldn’t necessarily make buyers of the coins “naive” or “fools”.

    But its ugly !!! so what were the buyers even thinking? If they weren't thinking crack that mess and dip it then they are too far gone to help here

    Many years ago, I saw numerous other examples that were attractive, not ugly. Regardless, your reply ignored the fact that top grading companies were fooled by some of the coins.

    were they marking them off as AT back then ? Its a real coin with an assigned grade on the slab. If you decide to paddle up $hit creek beyond that point pcgs won't hand you a paddle. PCGS should not be responsible for any color premium speculation.

    If the coin is in the price guide for $400 and some fool pays $2000 based on some splotchy green and red surface then that fool would probably just buy scratch tickets with their extra money anyway.

    If a shifty seller wasn't trying to gouge the potential buyer based on color the question wouldn't even come up.

  • planetsteveplanetsteve Posts: 1,425 ✭✭✭✭

    Is there a legitimate, accepted style of toning that bears a resemblance to this? This “crackled” appearance, though not necessarily the same color pattern, reminds me of what I’ve seen in images of Franklins. I know little about that series.

  • thisnamztakenthisnamztaken Posts: 4,101 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Great post, BroadStruck!

    I never thought that growing old would happen so fast.
    - Jim
  • georgiacop50georgiacop50 Posts: 2,909 ✭✭✭✭

    Many are commenting that this one looks UGLY. But, as others have said, some were VERY attractive...

  • BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @georgiacop50 said:
    Many are commenting that this one looks UGLY. But, as others have said, some were VERY attractive...

    Most aren't this dark... The host coin's level of luster has a lot to do with the end results.

    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • TomBTomB Posts: 22,123 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @planetsteve said:
    Is there a legitimate, accepted style of toning that bears a resemblance to this? This “crackled” appearance, though not necessarily the same color pattern, reminds me of what I’ve seen in images of Franklins. I know little about that series.

    It depends how similar you want, but yes, there are naturally toned coins that can have a similar pattern and these are often 1950s era toned coins taken from original US government mint sets.

    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image
  • Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @bronco2078 said: "True but maybe it indicates that the TPG's don't care all that much its a real coin and if they turned away ugly coins or coins that should not be submitted for other reasons there goes 90% of the revenue."

    We have already established the fact that Ugly is in the eye of the beholder. I see hundreds of coins a day and truthfully, I can apply my opinion of "ugly" to less than five and most of the time NONE.

    That old crackle finish was beautiful when it first came out. The coins were iridescent! Imagine a commemorative coin with blocks of sea-green, pink, aquamarine, tan and gold with flashes of eye-blinding white silver peeking out between the blocks.

    PS Your 90% is both an uninformed and very wacky statement. I'm going to tell myself that you don't really believe that and have used hyperbole to bolster your opinion. :)

  • bronco2078bronco2078 Posts: 10,425 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Insider2 said:
    @bronco2078 said: "True but maybe it indicates that the TPG's don't care all that much its a real coin and if they turned away ugly coins or coins that should not be submitted for other reasons there goes 90% of the revenue."

    We have already established the fact that Ugly is in the eye of the beholder. I see hundreds of coins a day and truthfully, I can apply my opinion of "ugly" to less than five and most of the time NONE.

    That old crackle finish was beautiful when it first came out. The coins were iridescent! Imagine a commemorative coin with blocks of sea-green, pink, aquamarine, tan and gold with flashes of eye-blinding white silver peeking out between the blocks.

    PS Your 90% is both an uninformed and very wacky statement. I'm going to tell myself that you don't really believe that and have used hyperbole to bolster your opinion. :)

    Of course its hyperbole :D but if it makes you feel better within the 90% is every single piece of graded bullion . millions of silver eagles silver maples pandas , kooks koalas and modern clad dreck

  • Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @bronco2078 said:

    @Insider2 said:
    @bronco2078 said: "True but maybe it indicates that the TPG's don't care all that much its a real coin and if they turned away ugly coins or coins that should not be submitted for other reasons there goes 90% of the revenue."

    We have already established the fact that Ugly is in the eye of the beholder. I see hundreds of coins a day and truthfully, I can apply my opinion of "ugly" to less than five and most of the time NONE.

    That old crackle finish was beautiful when it first came out. The coins were iridescent! Imagine a commemorative coin with blocks of sea-green, pink, aquamarine, tan and gold with flashes of eye-blinding white silver peeking out between the blocks.

    PS Your 90% is both an uninformed and very wacky statement. I'm going to tell myself that you don't really believe that and have used hyperbole to bolster your opinion. :)

    Of course its hyperbole :D but if it makes you feel better within the 90% is every single piece of graded bullion . millions of silver eagles silver maples pandas , kooks koalas and modern clad dreck

    Sorry, I'm really easy to confuse. The items you mention above probably comprise a large amount of a modern TPGS's business. As these issues are rarely UGLY this statement makes no sense to me at all: "if they turned away ugly coins or coins that should not be submitted for other reasons there goes 90% of the revenue." :wink:

  • bronco2078bronco2078 Posts: 10,425 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Insider2 said:

    @bronco2078 said:

    @Insider2 said:
    @bronco2078 said: "True but maybe it indicates that the TPG's don't care all that much its a real coin and if they turned away ugly coins or coins that should not be submitted for other reasons there goes 90% of the revenue."

    We have already established the fact that Ugly is in the eye of the beholder. I see hundreds of coins a day and truthfully, I can apply my opinion of "ugly" to less than five and most of the time NONE.

    That old crackle finish was beautiful when it first came out. The coins were iridescent! Imagine a commemorative coin with blocks of sea-green, pink, aquamarine, tan and gold with flashes of eye-blinding white silver peeking out between the blocks.

    PS Your 90% is both an uninformed and very wacky statement. I'm going to tell myself that you don't really believe that and have used hyperbole to bolster your opinion. :)

    Of course its hyperbole :D but if it makes you feel better within the 90% is every single piece of graded bullion . millions of silver eagles silver maples pandas , kooks koalas and modern clad dreck

    Sorry, I'm really easy to confuse. The items you mention above probably comprise a large amount of a modern TPGS's business. As these issues are rarely UGLY this statement makes no sense to me at all: "if they turned away ugly coins or coins that should not be submitted for other reasons there goes 90% of the revenue." :wink:

    Thats correct. A large part of the business should be sent back untouched not sure if its 90% but it might be close.

    Bullion , modern dreck , anything already in a slab (job is already done why is it being sent back in fool ?) , sent back to the submitter with a caustically worded note . Charge them full rate and return the stuff untouched . They will get the message. With that sort of streamlining PCGS could lay a bunch of people off after a little while :# , then maybe drop the prices :D

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file