Options
Guess the grade - $10 Liberty
Pedzola
Posts: 1,010 ✭✭✭✭✭
Curious what others on the forum think of this coin. Sorry, no prize, just the fun of it. 
Tagged:
2
Pedzola
Posts: 1,010 ✭✭✭✭✭
Pedzola
Posts: 1,010 ✭✭✭✭✭
Pedzola
Posts: 1,010 ✭✭✭✭✭
Comments
Looks Ms 65 to me 👍
Wish I could afford to collect gold that nice. Looks way better than the 64+ I had last year. Wouldn't be surprised at a 65+ or 66.
64
From the pictures 65
64-65. Very nice looking.
64.
The original photo was from an auction. I just took these through a loupe with my phone, for a different perspective:
My Gold Type Set
Hmm ... never easy by photos but put me down for 64.
64
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars
I can’t see it less than a 65 unless the luster is real dull. Surfaces look gem for sure so I’ll guess 65
64+
MS65. Very nice!
64+
64 shot 65 at the height of grade inflation
I just cant see that as a 64 but if it is wow! 65 I say
65
Strong 64.
In the 64 crowd
Hard to tell from those pics. MS 64 or 65 depending on which pic you go by.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
Very solid 63++ perhaps even a 64. Congrats!
The whole worlds off its rocker, buy Gold™.
Friction on the high points from second pictures; 62/63.
It is a 64.
To my novice eye it looks very nice for a 64, compared to some of my other gold pieces. It looks good in hand as well.
I want to get it reholdered with a trueview. Should I send it in for a re-grade instead for a shot at an upgrade? Only a couple on this thread hought it could be less than a 64, so seems low risk?
What keeps this a 64 instead of a 65?
In any case its a very nice coin and will be a keeper for my gold type set.
My Gold Type Set
I think the dent on the forehead is pretty distracting so that may be why. Could also be the darks spots in the fields.
What keeps it a 64 might be muted luster.
To be honest I have somehow overlooked this forehead "dent" it almost looks like part of the hair. I just brought up coinfacts to show you a picture to say "see they are all like that" and I was very wrong. I feel dumb! I can see that keeping it from 65, though I have seen 65s with worse. My 65 saint practically has an arm cut off.
My Gold Type Set
I could see an upgrade, but then again, not if I was resubmitting it.
I thought the same also and had to check coinfacts. Wasn't sure if it was part of the hair or pmd. If it was hidden in the hair I bet you it'd be a 65 easy.
Whatever you decided to do ...... she is a BEAUTY! From the the 1st pix I though for sure 65 and the label looks fairly new as well so maybe it is a solid 64 as graded.
Congrats on a beautiful coin regardless.....
im not good with grading gold but do like that one. a high grade coin for sure, I like
My first thought was that it looked like a 64+ from the first images, a 64- from the 2nd images, and that it was most likely in an MS-65 holder. I would consider going for the upgrade.
That's a really nice looking 64! I was thinking it might have been a 65 because it is super clean looking with just a couple of minor hits to the face but nothing real distracting and the reverse is very nice looking as well. A beautiful coin you have!
I am late to the game (this working is for the birds)... but definitely saw it as a 64 and possible 65. Cheers, RickO
It's a very clean 64 and an attractive coin regardless of grade; I think friction is the limiting factor.
Regrade.
Great transactions with oih82w8, JasonGaming, Moose1913.
CAC deserving coin isn’t it ?👍👍
That coin doesn't need a CAC sticker. That coin can be sold on it's own merits.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
Here is a 64+ that I have since sold. I chose it after looking at dozens of baggy 64's.
If you are sending it back in for imaging, get it regraded. I don't know how much more it would be worth with a plus attached, but it is a very nice 64 and I would be delighted to have it in my collection! Nice coin!!
Thank you, I think I will take a chance on a regrade. Seems like little risk and as mentioned it was going back for a new holder one way or other. Bolivar thanks for the pics of your 64+ for comparison. Maybe tough to evaluate from pics but I would say mine compares favorably.
Thanks all for the input.
My Gold Type Set
My guess was 65. That's a very solid 64!
My YouTube Channel
Well I did end up sending it back to pcgs for a regrade. I was hoping for at least a + but it is still a 64. $190 shipping and fees for this regrade + 2 reholders. Ouch.
Here is the trueview, a little more honest than the original auction images.
My Gold Type Set
@Pedzola
Thanks for all the follow-ups on your Liberty. Love that gold!
Always interesting to see the results when a coin gets sent in / sent back. Plus the trueviews are excellent. So I'm glad the follow-up is appreciated.
I've got one more coin to find for my 20th century gold type set. A 1900+ $2.5 lib in 66. Have the other 7 coins, all gold shield / trueviewed. Have seen a couple of the $2.5 libs but for something i never plan to upgrade im trying to find the right one. My indian/gaudens 4 are all candidates for upgrade in the future, but just dont care enough about the libs to spend more $$ for better examples. At least not yet. Very happy with the $10 I've shared in this thread.
My Gold Type Set
Heres my set album for anyone interested. https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/album/174178
My Gold Type Set
Very nice registry/collection! Thanks for the showing.
My 64.
Also MY photo so not that great.
But... as far as I saw, only that black streak.
???