Opinion on this 83-o morgan
Bigbuck1975
Posts: 1,278 ✭✭✭✭✭
Was watching on eBay. Thoughts? I like the look for some reason. Thought it could be flashy in hand.
0
Bigbuck1975
Posts: 1,278 ✭✭✭✭✭
Comments
MS64
Any chance it would have went PL?
IMO hard to tell with the pictures. I have found A lot of coins that are PL don't necessarily look PL in pictures.
The seller uses the same description for every coin they have listed and has no recent feedback as a seller. All the pictures are different which leads me to believe the pictures are hacked and the auctions are not real.
Part of the reason I avoided @Pittstate03
Probably 64PL, but 83-O isn't a tough PL date.
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
It’s a very nice strike for the o mint you normally see that at the s mint
https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/quarters/washington-quarters-major-sets/washington-quarters-date-set-circulation-strikes-1932-present/publishedset/209923
https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/quarters/washington-quarters-major-sets/washington-quarters-date-set-circulation-strikes-1932-present/album/209923
As previously mentioned, looks 64. Congrats
The whole worlds off its rocker, buy Gold™.
BOOMIN!™
Wooooha! Did someone just say it's officially "TACO™" Tuesday????
Looks 63+ PL
64PL. Is it normal for there to be that much space between denticles to the right of the date above the star?
It has nice frost, but the fields are not so nice... and a lot of scratches on the cheek. Cheers, RickO
I see a green spot next to the "U" on the reverse. PVC?