Looking at the close-up pics. The cent on the right might have MD so the 2 appears thicker but they both look skinny at the curve. And the 8s on both cents do not look fatty.
Probably both small date.
Now weigh it to see if you got predominate copper or zinc.
I am aware of the different on small and large date. The 4 others appeared to have different 2 on date found 3 in NY and one in GA possible illusion ? Just wondering what happened to this coins tankyou
Comments
Looking at the close-up pics. The cent on the right might have MD so the 2 appears thicker but they both look skinny at the curve. And the 8s on both cents do not look fatty.
Probably both small date.
Now weigh it to see if you got predominate copper or zinc.
The one on right is the normal 82 large date. The all copper weigh.
Additional photos
You will have to post more photos before we can begin to form a proper opinion.
You need to crop your photos too.
You may have to get a better camera.
Most likely an illusion caused by strike, die wear, circulation or corrosion.
My eyes playing tricks... Your close-ups seem different than your full coin pics.
Here are a couple pics from our host. Since you have the coins in-hand compare and describe the similarities or differences.
Small Date
Large Date
All are large dates.
I am aware of the different on small and large date. The 4 others appeared to have different 2 on date found 3 in NY and one in GA possible illusion ? Just wondering what happened to this coins tankyou
The differences appear to be wear/damage...Cheers, RickO