TrueView: 1891 Proof Seated Quarter with rainbow toning

Senator32 · October 21, 2018 5:00PM

The newest addition to my PCGS Proof Seated Quarter collection just crossed to PCGS and is a lovely thing! Was a bit surprised by the PCGS grade of PR-65CAM (was in an older NGC 66CAM holder, and I even thought it was PQ for that) - but maybe I am missing something...or PCGS is just a bit tight at the moment ...either way I love the coin and am keeping it long term so no worries here.

Cladiator · October 21, 2018 5:29PM

It's stunning, regardless of what the label says.

DollarAfterDollar · October 21, 2018 5:45PM

Toough to understand a downgrade here.
Great coin in any event.

AUandAG · October 21, 2018 6:07PM

Cabinet friction on knees and chest is the likely cause......Gorgeous for sure!

bob

Smudge · October 21, 2018 6:15PM

Lovely coin and 65 is still a strong grade. I would not sweat it since it is a keeper.

SeatedToners · October 21, 2018 6:21PM

Pretty quarter!

Weiss · October 21, 2018 6:28PM

Rub at 3:00 reverse.

.

j/k. We kid because we love.

kaz · October 21, 2018 6:29PM

Whoa, Nellie!

golden · October 21, 2018 6:29PM

Beautiful!

Timbuk3 · October 21, 2018 10:43PM

Very nice, congratulations !!!

coinnut · October 22, 2018 3:46AM

Simply gorgeous!! Looks at least 67 to me.

ChangeInHistory · October 22, 2018 4:27AM

She's a beauty!

cheezhed · October 22, 2018 5:18AM

Exquisite

Rittenhouse · October 22, 2018 6:21AM

A couple ticks and a bit of rub here and there, but who freakin' cares?!? The coin is simply gorgeous regardless. Which would you rather own, a 66 or whatever where others note you got a "good grade" or a gorgeous piece where everyone remarks that the grade seems way too low for the stunning look? TDN has perfectly illustrated "buy the coin, not the holder."

ricko · October 22, 2018 6:26AM

That is a beautiful coin (detail and strike)... I can certainly see a 66 justified... However, it is the coin that is great, not the label. Cheers, RickO