Home U.S. Coin Forum

This 1883 v nickel is different. Off center obverse and struck over another coin?

Please help me with this one. Is it correct to say it’s an off center struck obverse and look all that’s going on here, is it struck over another coin . Lots of weird lines and the I in America .





Comments

  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,710 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Too worn to merit any numismatic premium for the slightly misaligned obverse die. (This assumes anyone would pay a numismatic premium for it even in a higher grade, which I would not.) G6.

    All glory is fleeting.
  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 36,924 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited September 28, 2018 3:08PM

    Slightly off center. Die chip in the "I".

    Could you show me a trace of another coin's elements? How about just weighing it?

    You should try writing fiction. You have the best developed imagination on the board.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, evn when irrefutably accurate.

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited September 28, 2018 6:42AM

    I agree with @mannie gray ....Cheers, RickO

  • FredWeinbergFredWeinberg Posts: 5,930 ✭✭✭✭✭

    A decent mis-aligned obv. die

    Not double struck or off center.

    Retired Collector & Dealer in Major Mint Error Coins & Currency since the 1960's.Co-Author of Whitman's "100 Greatest U.S. Mint Error Coins", and the Error Coin Encyclopedia, Vols., III & IV. Retired Authenticator for Major Mint Errors for PCGS. A 50+ Year PNG Member.A full-time numismatist since 1972, retired in 2022.
  • AlexinPAAlexinPA Posts: 1,458 ✭✭✭✭✭

    One thing you can be assured of: I don't know. :/

  • CascadeChrisCascadeChris Posts: 2,529 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited September 28, 2018 6:00PM

    @291fifth said:
    Too worn to merit any numismatic premium for the slightly misaligned obverse die. (This assumes anyone would pay a numismatic premium for it even in a higher grade, which I would not.) G6.

    Apparently you haven't searched sold listings for Misaligned dies on Ebay. Premiums galore and with no seeming care for missing device elements either. There is a market, seemingly..

    The more you VAM..
  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,710 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @CascadeChris said:

    @291fifth said:
    Too worn to merit any numismatic premium for the slightly misaligned obverse die. (This assumes anyone would pay a numismatic premium for it even in a higher grade, which I would not.) G6.

    Apparently you haven't searched sold listings for Misaligned dies on Ebay. Premiums galore and with no seeming care for missing device elements either. There is a market, seemingly..

    I haven't looked at eBay in years. Even if "the market" is paying a premium for such minor errors I wouldn't be. Now that I think about it, there are many things in numismatics I simply reject including popular areas such as Overton numbers or VAMs. If they want to spend their money on such items that is up to them.

    All glory is fleeting.
  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 36,924 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @CascadeChris said:

    @291fifth said:
    Too worn to merit any numismatic premium for the slightly misaligned obverse die. (This assumes anyone would pay a numismatic premium for it even in a higher grade, which I would not.) G6.

    Apparently you haven't searched sold listings for Misaligned dies on Ebay. Premiums galore and with no seeming care for missing device elements either. There is a market, seemingly..

    They haveto be more than 3% off

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, evn when irrefutably accurate.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file