Home U.S. Coin Forum

Unusual! Note from Superintendant of the Mint found in mint set UPDATE WITH SOMETHING EVEN COOLER!!

georgiacop50georgiacop50 Posts: 2,909 ✭✭✭✭
edited March 24, 2019 12:34PM in U.S. Coin Forum

I say unusual because I have seen a plethora of 1959-1964 mint sets but don't recall seeing this note before. This was in a 1961 set.

Comments

  • Timbuk3Timbuk3 Posts: 11,658 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Cool, I've never seen one before either !!! B)

    Timbuk3
  • ECHOESECHOES Posts: 2,974 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @georgiacop50 said:
    I say unusual because I have seen a plethora of 1959-1964 mint sets but don't recall seeing this note before. This was in a 1961 set.

    I have never seen this before, have to say items such as this I love the most.
    Doubt many of these were saved, very cool.

    ~HABE FIDUCIAM IN DOMINO III V VI / III XVI~
    POST NUBILA PHOEBUS / AFTER CLOUDS, SUN
    Love for Music / Collector of Dreck
  • JBKJBK Posts: 16,206 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That's a keeper.

    I had to read it twice to figure out what it meant. The treasurer was handing sales off to the Philly mint.

  • RogerBRogerB Posts: 8,852 ✭✭✭✭✭

    This type of insert appears occasionally, but it's a neat reminder of communication a half-century ago.

  • JBKJBK Posts: 16,206 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I do have 1961 proof set with a note about the packaging of the coins, tarnish, etc.

  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,597 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I have never seen this note.
    TD

    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • MedalCollectorMedalCollector Posts: 2,006 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 26, 2018 8:43PM

    Not necessarily a note from the Superintendent, rather it was likely issued by the Treasury.

    Either the Treasury no longer wanted to do mail order sales in this manner, or the Mint was cutting distribution channels to cut costs or reduce process waste. It likely made sense to do this, because there were so few orders using this method and thus so few of these notes survived.

    The real answer may be out there somewhere....

  • mannie graymannie gray Posts: 7,259 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That's a first for me as well.
    And I have looked through 2/3 of a plethora, lol

  • gonzergonzer Posts: 3,047 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 27, 2018 3:57AM

    It would seem to be directing the person to address future orders TO the Superintendent rather than the note being penned by him.

  • 1630Boston1630Boston Posts: 14,111 ✭✭✭✭✭

    interesting find :smile:

    Successful transactions with : MICHAELDIXON, Manorcourtman, Bochiman, bolivarshagnasty, AUandAG, onlyroosies, chumley, Weiss, jdimmick, BAJJERFAN, gene1978, TJM965, Smittys, GRANDAM, JTHawaii, mainejoe, softparade, derryb, Ricko

    Bad transactions with : nobody to date

  • thisistheshowthisistheshow Posts: 9,386 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @JBK said:
    That's a keeper.

    +1

    Very cool.
    Thanks for sharing!

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That is the first one I have seen... and I have opened a lot of old sets... maybe the note was just discarded when the sets were first received. Cheers, RickO

  • georgiacop50georgiacop50 Posts: 2,909 ✭✭✭✭

    Actually 2 updates on this:

    1) I have now found 2 additional notes like the one in the OP...all 3 found in 1961 Mint Sets.

    2) I have come across a 1963 Mint Set that contains an Order Acknowledgement with an order number matching the order number on the Treasury mailer.

    Folks I can confidently say I have handled upwards of 1000 1963 mint sets and NEVER seen an Order Acknowledgement before, with or without the outer mailer.

    Has anyone ever seen one of these in a mint set before??

  • JBKJBK Posts: 16,206 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I suspect that was sent to the buyer well before the sets were shipped, and the collector slipped it in there when he received the sets.

    When I started ordering from the mint in 1971, it was a months-long process.

  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,597 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Bump for consideration in the thread about Mint sets with two different kinds of tokens in them.

    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • mannie graymannie gray Posts: 7,259 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @georgiacop50 said:
    Actually 2 updates on this:

    1) I have now found 2 additional notes like the one in the OP...all 3 found in 1961 Mint Sets.

    2) I have come across a 1963 Mint Set that contains an Order Acknowledgement with an order number matching the order number on the Treasury mailer.

    Folks I can confidently say I have handled upwards of 1000 1963 mint sets and NEVER seen an Order Acknowledgement before, with or without the outer mailer.

    Has anyone ever seen one of these in a mint set before??

    No I have not.

  • BStrauss3BStrauss3 Posts: 3,633 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Both documents look computer printed on multi-part forms. Would have been very, very high tech for 1963.

    Likely they would have mailed the acknowledgment as soon as the order was entered. Then used the top part as the mailing label when the set was ready a few weeks later (note the May 64 date on one and the Apr 8, 1963 postmark).

    M. Weiss likely put the acknowledgment in a pending file and then filed it in with the set when s/he received it.

    -----Burton
    ANA 50 year/Life Member (now "Emeritus")

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file