Home› U.S. Coin Forum

Undergraded, overgraded or just right?

affordafford Posts: 1,723 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited August 14, 2018 8:48PM in U.S. Coin Forum


Comments

  • tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,166 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Shrug

    Early Dollar Set
  • Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 14, 2018 9:21PM

    EDIT: I read this a post and saw an 1892 Proof Morgan with a washed-out, yellow-orange coin image for the obverse.
    Now, it is an 1893-S! I removed all my comments which make no sense now and I'm going to bed!!

  • thefinnthefinn Posts: 2,657 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Descent color. Just can't tell if it was over cleaned to make 58 from the pics.

    thefinn
  • BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Could be right on, could be a bit over graded...

    But the toning the ANACS and NGC Fatties add to these better date AU's make them desirable.

    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @thefinn said:
    Descent color. Just can't tell if it was over cleaned to make 58 from the pics.

    The toning that these labels create won't progress beyond just hugging the rims if the coin was cleaned or polished.

    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • thefinnthefinn Posts: 2,657 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Broadstruck said:

    @thefinn said:
    Descent color. Just can't tell if it was over cleaned to make 58 from the pics.

    The toning that these labels create won't progress beyond just hugging the rims if the coin was cleaned or polished.

    The toning didn't stop at the rims on this one, which leads me to believe it was toned before it got encapsulated.

    thefinn
  • BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 14, 2018 9:17PM

    @thefinn said:

    @Broadstruck said:

    @thefinn said:
    Descent color. Just can't tell if it was over cleaned to make 58 from the pics.

    The toning that these labels create won't progress beyond just hugging the rims if the coin was cleaned or polished.

    The toning didn't stop at the rims on this one, which leads me to believe it was toned before it got encapsulated.

    The reverse maybe, but the obverse is all signature label toning.

    Shame the photos don't really let you see the coin.

    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • lkeneficlkenefic Posts: 8,338 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Tough date, but I'm not a huge fan of this kind of toning... especially for 58 money. To each, their own....

    Collecting: Dansco 7070; Middle Date Large Cents (VF-AU); Box of 20;

    Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
  • cameonut2011cameonut2011 Posts: 10,181 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Accurate, but not attractive to me

  • 1Mike11Mike1 Posts: 4,422 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I would say a touch over. 55 sounds fair. Not a fan of the toning on this one.

    "May the silver waves that bear you heavenward be filled with love’s whisperings"

    "A dog breaks your heart only one time and that is when they pass on". Unknown
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • MikeInFLMikeInFL Posts: 10,188 ✭✭✭✭
    edited August 15, 2018 2:04AM

    Who can tell from the photo? Not me.

    I'd go with ANACS here in lieu of information to the contrary.

    Collector of Large Cents, US Type, and modern pocket change.
  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,547 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The photo quality isn't good but my gut feeling is that AU58 is too high. Retoning after a long ago cleaning is possible.

    All glory is fleeting.
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Picture does not allow for anything beyond a 'pull it out of your 'hat''guess.....Cheers, RickO

  • tommy44tommy44 Posts: 2,308 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Maybe it's just me but I'm seeing a P mint reverse that looks like a proof strike.

    it's crackers to slip a rozzer the dropsy in snide

  • UnknownUnknown
    edited August 15, 2018 12:32PM
    This content has been removed.
  • ashelandasheland Posts: 23,557 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Seems correctly graded. How is the luster?

    My YouTube Channel

  • CCGGGCCGGG Posts: 1,267 ✭✭✭✭✭

    ANACS was generous, as usual.

  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • ashelandasheland Posts: 23,557 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I've usually been happy with the coins in the older white ANACS holders. It's likely spot on.

    My friend recently showed me a Confederate half dollar he just got back from PCGS, MS61
    It was cracked and sent raw from an old white ANACS... They had it the same grade, 61. Pretty consistent if you ask me.

    My YouTube Channel

  • topstuftopstuf Posts: 14,803 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Remember when the biggest threat was not finding a 1909-S VDB in the change you went through from the grocery store?

    I do.

    HIGH TIME TO GO OUT TO PASTURE I THINK :'(

  • Dave99BDave99B Posts: 8,649 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Seems about right to me.

    Dave

    Always looking for original, better date VF20-VF35 Barber quarters and halves, and a quality beer.
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • ashelandasheland Posts: 23,557 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Lets see a picture!

    My YouTube Channel

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Format
SpoilerCodeQuote
Heading 2Heading 1
Emoji
:):D:(;):/:o:s:p:'(:|B):#:*<3o:)>:)
Url
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file
Home • U.S. Coin ForumComment As ...