Home U.S. Coin Forum

Odd find going through some 90%

ChangeInHistoryChangeInHistory Posts: 3,083 ✭✭✭✭✭

I ran across this quarter going though some 90%. It looks like a retained cud or something similar.

Any thoughts are appreciated.







Comments

  • AUandAGAUandAG Posts: 24,890 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Yup, cud it is. Good eye, who even looks at these worn examples anymore?????

    lol,
    bob :)

    Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
  • JBKJBK Posts: 16,252 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Man that coin is BEAT.

    Unless that is a spot of silver solder (no reason to think it is) that is a cud (not a retained cud as the piece of the die has broken away and is gone).

  • FredWeinbergFredWeinberg Posts: 5,913 ✭✭✭✭✭

    There is no Cud die break error on this quarter.

    It's solder, (or a very deep edge bruise!).....

    The coin is well worn, damaged, and not
    an error coin of any type.........sorry

    Retired Collector & Dealer in Major Mint Error Coins & Currency since the 1960's.Co-Author of Whitman's "100 Greatest U.S. Mint Error Coins", and the Error Coin Encyclopedia, Vols., III & IV. Retired Authenticator for Major Mint Errors for PCGS. A 50+ Year PNG Member.A full-time numismatist since 1972, retired in 2022.
  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 35,803 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Just looks like damage to me - unless that spot is raised well above the surface.

  • JBKJBK Posts: 16,252 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Oh well, hence its inclusion in a lot of junk silver....

  • EXOJUNKIEEXOJUNKIE Posts: 1,622 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Does not look like a cud to me. I vote PMD.

    I'm addicted to exonumia ... it is numismatic crack!

    ANA LM

    USAF Retired — 34 years of active military service! 🇺🇸
  • ChrisH821ChrisH821 Posts: 6,661 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It isn't a lead counterfeit is it? That thing looks terrible.

    Collector, occasional seller

  • Namvet69Namvet69 Posts: 9,221 ✭✭✭✭✭

    There have been other cuds that large so why the doubting Thomases? Peace Roy

    BST: endeavor1967, synchr, kliao, Outhaul, Donttellthewife, U1Chicago, ajaan, mCarney1173, SurfinHi, MWallace, Sandman70gt, mustanggt, Pittstate03, Lazybones, Walkerguy21D, coinandcurrency242 , thebigeng, Collectorcoins, JimTyler, USMarine6, Elkevvo, Coll3ctor, Yorkshireman, CUKevin, ranshdow, CoinHunter4, bennybravo, Centsearcher, braddick, Windycity, ZoidMeister, mirabela, JJM, RichURich, Bullsitter, jmski52, LukeMarshall, coinsarefun, MichaelDixon, NickPatton, ProfLiz, Twobitcollector,Jesbroken oih82w8, DCW

  • FredWeinbergFredWeinberg Posts: 5,913 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The size of the 'blob' of metal has nothing to do with any of
    us thinking it's not a Cud (because of the size.)

    You're right - there are many Cuds on all denominations
    that are much larger - but this 1941 Silver Quarter isn't one of them.

    Retired Collector & Dealer in Major Mint Error Coins & Currency since the 1960's.Co-Author of Whitman's "100 Greatest U.S. Mint Error Coins", and the Error Coin Encyclopedia, Vols., III & IV. Retired Authenticator for Major Mint Errors for PCGS. A 50+ Year PNG Member.A full-time numismatist since 1972, retired in 2022.
  • JBKJBK Posts: 16,252 ✭✭✭✭✭

    On second look I am guessing the sloping sides of the blob and the flat surface that is level with the rim are problematic.

    Does that thing ring when you drop it, or does it go "thud"?

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That does look like it is 'added'.... likely solder...Cheers, RickO

  • astroratastrorat Posts: 9,221 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Please post a full image of the reverse. It may be possible to point out a missing diagnostic that will help others when considering if a blob is a 'cud.' On the opposite side of the cud, a common diagnostic is to have a 'hollow' where the metal flowed into the cud and away from the die during striking.

    Numismatist Ordinaire
    See http://www.doubledimes.com for a free online reference for US twenty-cent pieces

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file