1881 Morgan Dollar - is the coloration toning or damage (or both)?

Another "new guy" question... I can't tell if this 1881 Morgan dollar is toned, damaged, or both. The details are much better than any other Morgans I have (which isn't saying much - I don't expect there's any use in submitting this) - the stars are very crisp in hand, the hair details look good, the eagle wing feathers look complete, etc. - but the color is much "worse" than my others ("worse" in quotes because it could be toning but my rookie eyes aren't that sophisticated...). Apologies for the pictures - I'm limited to a scanner and iPhone with not a lot of practice, so these may not provide any useful info... but I'm specifically asking about the reds and blues that are most evident in the 3rd and 4th pictures.
Thanks.
Jim
0
Comments
AT and some fingerprints, go stillers!
The whole worlds off its rocker, buy Gold™.
BOOMIN!™
Wooooha! Did someone just say it's officially "TACO™" Tuesday????
AU, AT and ABCD!
bob
Just unattractive toning. Most amateur AT is purple, electric blue and gold.
Coin doctors try to make them pretty. That toning is sort of plain Jane and natural I think.
I agree with the AU assessment.
The coin has neutral to negative toning, IMO.
Sort of an ugly-toned AU 'slider' - and not even a dip will "improve" it - dipped AU's are rarely good looking IMHO.
Check out my current listings: https://ebay.com/sch/khunt/m.html?_ipg=200&_sop=12&_rdc=1
Unattractive tarnish for sure... the scratch on the cheek and the hit on the lip will hurt the grade... and it might get 'details'... Cheers, RickO
Natural toning, but negative eye-appeal.
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution