Home› U.S. Coin Forum

1889-CC Morgan dollar - the serial # is ok, but the coin & slab are not

KollectorKingKollectorKing Posts: 4,820 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited June 5, 2018 8:08PM in U.S. Coin Forum

Not my lousy pics


Comments

  • KollectorKingKollectorKing Posts: 4,820 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 5, 2018 8:02PM

    I wonder if I should report it to our host?

    The seller has the nerve, gut to post his #. Probably a disposable phone.

  • COINS MAKE CENTSCOINS MAKE CENTS Posts: 1,861 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Pcgs and ms62 on the slab insert look to bold. The whole insert just looks funky the font and stuff

    New inventory added daily at Coins Make Cents
    HAPPY COLLECTING


  • david3142david3142 Posts: 3,582 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The title says 1888 but the date on the coin is 1889. Obviously, it would be easy to detect a fake 1888-CC!

  • BustyPotatoBustyPotato Posts: 81 ✭✭✭

    That label looks poorly shopped in the first pic, at least the PCGS MS 62 It just doesn't seem to match the lighting, or the centering on the slab itself. I suppose it could just be the weird angle. Also how are you going to sell a coin where the MM is the real money maker and use that blurry photo.

    A government accident left me a former man, a potato. That photo on my profile is a low resolution selfie. I like coins.

  • Timbuk3Timbuk3 Posts: 11,658 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Yikes !!! :s

    Timbuk3
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If those are the seller pictures (no link to check it out)... then I would just pass.... Cheers, RickO

  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,587 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Useless photos. Don't involve yourself with it.

    All glory is fleeting.
  • thefinnthefinn Posts: 2,657 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @david3142 said:
    The title says 1888 but the date on the coin is 1889. Obviously, it would be easy to detect a fake 1888-CC!

    Take another look, and don't squint this time.

    thefinn
  • KollectorKingKollectorKing Posts: 4,820 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 6, 2018 7:49AM

    @thefinn said:

    @david3142 said:
    The title says 1888 but the date on the coin is 1889. Obviously, it would be easy to detect a fake 1888-CC!

    Take another look, and don't squint this time.

    Sorry I made a typo in the original post, then I edited it to reflect 1889.

  • ashelandasheland Posts: 23,619 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 6, 2018 8:06AM

    You guys are crazy, that coin is real!

    ;)

    My YouTube Channel

  • ashelandasheland Posts: 23,619 ✭✭✭✭✭

    My YouTube Channel

  • david3142david3142 Posts: 3,582 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 6, 2018 11:46AM

    @david3142 said:
    The title says 1888 but the date on the coin is 1889. Obviously, it would be easy to detect a fake 1888-CC!

    @thefinn
    This is the problem with pointing out something which should be fixed. It looks like I’m crazy after the edit. I think that disagree should be removed!

  • SmudgeSmudge Posts: 9,763 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @asheland said:
    You guys are crazy, that coin is real!

    ;)

    Real what?

  • LindeDadLindeDad Posts: 18,766 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 6, 2018 12:00PM

    Pay your dues.

    My Current project....https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/mysetregistry/album/160794
  • thefinnthefinn Posts: 2,657 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @david3142 said:

    @david3142 said:
    The title says 1888 but the date on the coin is 1889. Obviously, it would be easy to detect a fake 1888-CC!

    @thefinn
    This is the problem with pointing out something which should be fixed. It looks like I’m crazy after the edit. I think that disagree should be removed!

    Now you have fixed it I can. I can't agree with something that is wrong. Facts can be wrong, but not opinions. But they may be misinformed.

    thefinn
  • johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 29,068 ✭✭✭✭✭

    big cow dung >:)

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Format
SpoilerCodeQuote
Heading 2Heading 1
Emoji
:):D:(;):/:o:s:p:'(:|B):#:*<3o:)>:)
Url
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file
Home • U.S. Coin ForumComment As ...