Best Of

@SeattleSlammer said:
CACG isn’t even two yet and IMO often intentionally undergrades as they continue to bolster their tough reputation.

I am not sure I follow what you are saying - CACG/CAC has its own set of standards for grading that John Albanese says is strictly adhered to. So if this is the case, how can they be intentionally undergrading?

Raw coins.
73D, MS66+ hit on Eagles leg. But if the luster is strong enough 67+.
74D, MS66/67 haze may hold it back. If you feel confident there are no hits under the haze give it a bath in MS70.
47, MS66/67+ negative toning, again give it a bath if clean underneath.
49D, MS66/67 repeat.
44S, MS66/+
47S, MS66
47P, MS65
49P, MS65
50S, Details, scratch.

Would be better if you could take hi-res images for better guesses.

@gumby1234 said:
Let's see some pics of it that you take.